The role of breast MRI in planning the surgical treatment of breast cancer

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 460-467

  Duygulu, Gökhan ^a   Oktay, Ayşenur ^b   Bilgen, Işil Günhan ^b   Kapkaç, Murat ^b   Zekioǧlu, Osman ^b  

^a Derince Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84866105412     PISSN: 13053825     EISSN: 13053612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5429-11.2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995; 196:115-122.
2. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196: 415-419.
3. Boetes C, Mus RDM, Holland R, et al. Breast tumours: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995; 197: 743-747.
4. Orel SG. High-resolution MR imaging for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiographics 1998; 18:903-912.
5. Mameri CS, Kemp C, Goldman SM, Sobral LA, Ajsen S. Impact of breast MRI on surgical treatment, axillary approach, and systemic therapy for breast cancer. Breast J 2008; 14:236-244.
6. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for detection, diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001; 220:13-30.
7. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes. Lancet 1997; 349: 1864-1867.
8. Fleming JD, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 5th ed. Phildelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 223-240.
9. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK, et al. BIRADS: Magnetic resonance imaging. In: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. eds. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-Breast imaging atlas, 1st ed. Reston, Virginia: American College of Radiology, 2003; 111-113.
10. Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1087-1092.
11. Harms SE. Integration of breast MRI in clinical trials. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 830-836.
12. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrastenhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213:881-888.
13. Zhang Y, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S, et al. The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 2002; 9: 231-239.
14. Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 441-445.
15. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:3248-3258.
16. Wiener JI, Schilling KJ, Adami C, Obuchowski NA. Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:878-886.
17. Grobmyer SR, Mortellaro VE, Marshall J, et al. Is there a role for routine use of MRI in selection of patients for breast-conserving cancer therapy? J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 1045-1050.
18. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Padula S, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 106:65-74.
19. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233:830-849.
20. Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, Solin LJ, Schnall MD. MRI before re-excision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182:473-480.
21. Braun M, Pölcher M, Schrading S, et al. Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 111:179-187.
22. Bagley FH. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg 2004; 139:380-383.
23. Pettit K, Swatske ME, Gao F, et al. The impact of breast MRI on surgical decisionmaking: are patients at risk for mastectomy? J Surg Oncol 2009; 100:553-558.
24. Lau B, Romero LM. Does preoperative magnetic resonance imaging beneficially alter surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma? Am Surg 2011; 77: 1368-1371.
25. Kuhl C, Kuhn W, Braun M, Schild H. Preoperative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back? Breast 2007; 16:34-44.
26. Camp ER, McAuliffe PF, Gilroy JS, et al. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 855-861.
27. Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30:501-507.
28. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:901-910.
29. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti G, Pnizza P, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:1149-1157.
30. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375:563-571.
31. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997; 202:413-420.
32. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Van Der Sluis RF, Ruijs JH. False negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:1231-1234.
33. Coombs NJ, Boyages J. Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: does each focus matter? J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7497-7502.