Intraoperative stereoscopic 3D video imaging: Pushing the boundaries of surgical visualisation and applications for neurosurgical education

British Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 662-667

  Heath, Michael D ^a   Cohen Gadol, Aaron A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Education; Imaging; Medical; Neurosurgery; Three dimensional

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; HISTORY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; NEUROSURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TRAINING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL STEREOSCOPIC IMAGING;

FORECASTING; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 84866079164     PISSN: 02688697     EISSN: 1360046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2012.672057     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Kroeker K. Looking beyond stereoscopic 3D's revival. Communications of the ACM [serial on the Internet] 2010;53(8):14-16.
2. Tomazevic D, Likar B, Pernus F. Gradient-based registration of 3D MR and 2D X-ray images. International Congress Series, Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2001:338-45.
3. Henn JS, Lemole GM, Jr, Ferreira MA, Gonzalez LF, Schornak M, Preul MC, et al. Interactive stereoscopic virtual reality: A new tool for neurosurgical education. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2002;96:144-9. (Pubitemid 34230001)
4. Gronningsaeter A, Lie T, Kleven A, Morland T, Lango T, Unsgard G, et al. Initial experience with stereoscopic visualization of three-dimensional ultrasound data in surgery. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1074-8.
5. Fraser JF, Allen B, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Th ree-dimensional neurostereoendoscopy: Subjective and objective comparison to 2D. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009;52:25-31.
6. Komotar RJ, Schwartz TH. The utility of 3D computer-based models in endoscopic skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2011;75:39-40.
7. Roth J, Fraser JF, Singh A, Bernardo A, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Surgical approaches to the orbital apex: Comparison of endoscopic endonasal and transcranial approaches using a novel 3D endoscope. Orbit 2011;30:43-8.
8. Ferragallo R. On stereoscopic painting. Leonardo [serial on the Internet]. 1974;7. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1572788.
9. Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol 1967;193:327-42.
10. StereoGraphics Corporation. S tereographics Developers ' Handbook [Electronic fi le]. San Rafael CA: StereoGraphics Corporation
11. Available from: http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/stc/FAQs/Stereo/stereo- handbook.pdf.
12. Servos P, Goodale M, Jakobson L. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Res 1992;32:1513-21.
13. Kaiser J. M ake your own stereo pictures. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1955.
14. Cohen M, da Costa Astur D, Kaleka CC, Arliani GG, Cohen C, Jalikjian W, et al. Introducing 3-dimensional stereoscopic imaging to the study of musculoskeletal anatomy. Arthroscopy 2011;27:593-6.
15. Xing L, You J, Ebrahimi T, Perkins A. Estimating quality of experience on stereoscopic images. Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications (ISPACS), 2010 International Symposium Issue date: Dec 6-8, 2010 ed. Trondheim, Norway: IEEE Xplore Digital Library, 2010. pp. 1-4.
16. Seuntiens P, Heynderickx I, IJesselsteijn W, van den Avoort P, Berentsen J, Dalm I, et al. Viewing experience and naturalness of 3D images. Proc SPIE [serial on the Internet] 2005;6016:601605. Available from: http:// spiedigitallibrary.org/proceedings/resource/2/psisdg/6016/1/601605-1? isAuthorized-no.
17. Lo CH, Chalmers A. Stereo vision for computer graphics: The eff ect that stereo vision has on human judgments of visual realism. SCCG ' 03 Proceedings of the 19th spring converence on computer graphics [serial on the Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id-984971.
18. Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Res. 1992;32:1513-21.
19. McWhorter S, Hodges L, Rodriguez W. Evaluation of display parameters aff ecting user performance of an interactive task in a virtual environment. SMARTech [serial on the Internet]. 1991. Available from: http://smartech.gatech. edu/handle/1853/3725.
20. Smith D, Cole R, Merritt J, Pepper R, Naval Ocean Systems Center San Diego CA. Remote operator performance comparing mono and stereo TV displays: The eff ects of visibility, learning and task factors. Storming Media [serial on the Internet]. 1979. Available from: http://www.stormingmedia.us/10/1028/ A102860.html.
21. Kim W, Ellis S, Hannaford B, Tyler M, Stark L. A quantitative evaluation of perspective and stereoscopic displays in three-axis manual tracking tasks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber. 1987;17:61-72. (Pubitemid 17549279)
22. van Beurden M, van Hoey G, Hatzakis H, Ijsselsteijn W. Stereoscopic displays in medical domains: A review of perception and performance eff ects. Proc SPIE [serial on the Internet]. 2009;7240:72400A. Available from: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/proceedings/resource/2/psisdg/7240/1/72400A-1? bypassSSO-1.
23. Tung T, Rathinam A, Kumarl Y, Rahman Z. Additional cues derived from three dimensional image processing to aid customised reconstruction for medical applications. In: al. HBZe, ed. IVIC 2009, LNCS 5857. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009:148-55.
24. Hegarty M, Keehner M, Cohen C, Montello D, Lippa Y. The role of spatial cognition in medicine: Applications for selecting and training professionals. In: Allen G, ed. Applied spatial cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007:285-315.
25. Luursema JM, Kommers PA, Verweij WB, Geelkerken RH. Stereopsis in medical virtual-learning-environments. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;103:262-9.