Stereo vision for computer graphics: The effect that stereo vision has on human judgments of visual realism

Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, SCCG 2003 - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 109-117

  Lo, C H ^a   Chalmers, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Realistic Computer Graphics; Stereo Vision; Visual Perception

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR DISPARITY; REALISTIC COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VISUAL REALISM;

ALGORITHMS; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; IMAGE QUALITY; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

STEREO VISION;

EID: 14244270014     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. K. Arthur, K.S. Booth, and C.Ware. (1993) Evaluating 3D Task Performance for Fish Tank Virtual Worlds. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 11(3) 239-265.
2. C. Barbour, and G. Meyer. Visual Cues and Pictorial Limitations for Computer Generated Photorealistic Images. In The Visual Computer, vol 9, pp. 151-165. 1992.
3. M. L. Braunstein, G. J. Anderson, M. W. Rouse, and J. S. Tittle. 1986. Recovering viewer-centered depth from disparity, occlusion and velocity gradients. Perception Psychophys. 40, 216-224.
4. A. L. Bridges, and J. M. Reising. 1987. Three-dimensional stereographic pictorial visual interfaces and display systems in flight simulation. In True Three-Dimensional Imaging Techniques and Display Technologies, D. F. McAllister and W. E. Robbins, Eds. Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 761. SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, 102-109.
5. M. E. Brown, and J. J. Gallimore. 1995. Visualization of three-dimensional structure during computer-aided design. Int. J. Human-Computer Interact. 7, 1 (Jan.-Mar. 1995), 37-56.
6. V. Bruce, P. Green, and M. Georgeson. Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology, and Ecology. East Sussex, UK, 1996. Psychology Press
7. N. Bruno, and J. E. Cutting. 1988. Minimodularity and the perception of layout. Journal of Experimental Psychology 117, 161-170.
8. K. Chiu, and P. Shirley. Rendering, Complexity, and Perception. In Proc of the 5th Eurographics Rendering Workshop. SpringerWien, New York, NY. 1994.
9. J. J. Clark, and A. L. Yuille. 1990. Data Fusion for Sensory Information Processing Systems. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
10. C. Erkelens. 1988. Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram. Vision Research, 28, 345-353.
11. D. H. Fender and B. Julesz 1967. Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stablized vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 819-830.
12. D. Ferster. 1981. Acomparison of binocular depth mechanism in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 311, 623-655.
13. C. F. Foard, and D. C. K. Nelson. 1984. Holistic and analytic modes of processing: The multiple determinants of perceptual analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 113, 94-111.
14. W. R. Garner, and G. L. Felfoldy. 1970. Integrality of stimulus in various types of information processing. Cognitive Science 1, 225-241.
15. J. M. Hollerbach, W. B. Thompson, and P. Shirley. The convergence of robotics, vision, and computer graphics for user interaction. International Journal of Robotics Research, 18:1088-1100, November
16. E. Horvitz and J. Lengyel. Perception, Attention, and Resources: A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Graphics Rendering. In Proc of Thirteenth Conf on Uncertainty in AI, pp. 238-249. Providence, 1997.
17. G. S. Hubona, P. N. Wheeler, G. W. Shirah, and M. Brandt. The relative contributions of stereo, lighting, and background scenes in promoting 3D depth visualization. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(3):214-242, September1999. Computer Graphics & Applications, pages 44-58, May 1992.
18. G. S. Hubona, P. N. Wheeler, G. W. Shirah, and M. Brandt. The relative contributions of stereo, lighting, and background scenes in promoting 3D depth visualization. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(3):214-242, September1999. Computer Graphics & Applications, pages 44-58, May 1992.
19. I. Gordon. Theories of Visual Perception. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1997.
20. E. B. Johnston, B. G. Cumming, and A. J. Parker. 1993. Integration of depth modules. Vision Research 33, 5/6, 813-826.
21. C. A. Kelsey. 1993. Detection of visual information. In Perception of Visual Information. W. R. Hendee and P. Wells, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Vienna, Austria, 30-51.
22. J. T. Kajiya. The rendering equation. In D. C. EVANS and R. J. ATHAY, editors, Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '86 Proceedings), volume 20, pages 143-150, August 1986.
23. L. Kjelldahl, and M. Prime. A study on how depth perception is affected by different presentation methods of 3D objects on a 2D display. Computers & Graphics, 19(2): 199-202, March 1995.
24. J. Lengyel. The Convergence of Graphics and Vision. In IEEE Computer, July 1998.
25. G. R. Lockhead. 1972. Processing dimensional stimuli: A note. Psychol. Rev. 79, 410-419.
26. A. Mcnamara, A. Chalmers, T. Troscianko, and I. Gilchrist. Comparing Real & Synthetic Scenes using Human Judgement of Lightness. In Proc of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. Springer-Verlag 2000.
27. G. Meyer, H. Rushmeier, M. Cohen, D. Greenberg, and K. Torrance. An Experimental Evaluation of Computer Graphics Imagery. In Transactions on Graphics, 5(1), pp. 30-50. New York, 1986. ACM.
28. Neurobehavioral Systems, Presentation program. http://www. neurobehavioralsystems.com/
29. K.N. Ogle. 1964. Researches in binocular vision. New York: Hafner.
30. R. Patterson. 1992 Human Stereopsis. Human Factors, 34(2) 669-692.
31. S. Pattanaik, J. Ferwerda, K. Torrance, and D. Greenberg. Validation of Global Illumination Solutions Through CCD Camera Measurements. In Proc of 5th Color Imaging Conf, Soc for Imaging Sei and Tech, pp. 250-253, 1997.
32. H. Rushmeier, G. Larson, C. Piatko, P. Sanders, and B. Rust. Comparing Real and Synthetic Images: Some Ideas About Metrics. In Proc of Eurographics Rendering Workshop 1995. Springer Wien, New York, NY. 1995.
33. C.M. Schor, and C. W. Tyler. 1981. Spatial-temporal properties of Panum's fusional area. Vision Research, 21, 683 - 692.
34. C. M. Schor, and I. Wood. 1983. Disparity range for local Stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency. Vision Research, 23, 1649 - 1654.
35. P. Rademacher, J. Lengyel, E. Cutrell, and T. Whitted. Measuring the Perception of Visual Realism in Images. Rendering Techniques 2001, 235-248.
36. P. Servos, M. A. Goodale, and L. S. Jakobson. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Research, 32(8): 1513-1521, 1992.
37. H. S. Smallman, and D. I. A. Macloed. 1994. Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold Journal of the Optical Society of America, All, 2169-2183.
38. L. Wanger, J. Ferwerda, and D. Greenberg.1992. Perceiving spatial relationships in computer generated images. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 12, 3 (May), 44-58.
39. G. J. Ward, The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '94 (Orlando, Florida) (A. Glassner, ed.), Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, July 1994. pp. 459 - 472.
40. H. Yee, S. Patanaik, and D. P. Greenberg. Spatiotemporal Sensitivity and Visual Attention for Efficient Rendering of Dynamic Environments. ACM Transaction on Graphics, Vol. 20, No. 1, January 2001.
41. 3d combine program. http://www.3dcombine.com/index.htm