The implementation of verbal instructions: Dissociating motor preparation from the formation of stimulus-response associations

NeuroImage

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1143-1153

  Hartstra, Egbert ^a   Waszak, Florian ^b,c   Brass, Marcel ^d,e  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

FMRI; IFJ; Instructions; IPS; S R associations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFERIOR FRONTAL JUNCTION; INFERIOR FRONTAL SULCUS; INFORMATION; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MENTAL DISSOCIATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866055666     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andersen R.A., Buneo C.A. Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 25:189-220.
2. Ashby F.G., Turner B.O., Horvitz J.C. Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14(5):208-215.
3. Boettiger C.A., D'Esposito M. Frontal networks for learning and executing arbitrary stimulus-response associations. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25(10):2723-2732.
4. Brass M., Derrfuss J., Forstmann B., von Cramon D.Y. The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9(7):314-316.
5. Brass M., Ullsperger M., Knoesche T.R., von Cramon D.Y., Phillips N.A. Who comes first? The role of the prefrontal and parietal cortex in cognitive control. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17(9):1367-1375.
6. Brass M., Wenke D., Spengler S., Waszak F. Neural correlates of overcoming interference from instructed and implemented stimulus-response associations. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(6):1766-1772.
7. Brett M., Anton J., Valabregue R., Poline J. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Sendai, Japan 2002.
8. Bunge S.A. How we use rules to select actions: a review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004, 4(4):564-579.
9. Cole M.W., Bagic A., Kass R., Schneider W. Prefrontal dynamics underlying rapid instructed task learning reverse with practice. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30(42):14245-14254.
10. De Baene W., Kuhn S., Brass M. Challenging a decade of brain research on task switching: brain activation in the task-switching paradigm reflects adaptation rather than reconfiguration of task sets. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012, 33(3):639-651.
11. De Houwer J. Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2004, 11(1):49-53.
12. De Houwer J., Beckers T., Vandorpe S., Custers R. Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects. Percept. Psychophys. 2005, 67(4):659-666.
13. Derrfuss J., Brass M., Neumann J., von Cramon D.Y. Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: meta-analyses of switching and Stroop studies. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 25(1):22-34.
14. Desmurget M., Sirigu A. A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13(10):411-419.
15. Doyon J., Benali H. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15(2):161-167.
16. Dumontheil I., Thompson R., Duncan J. Assembly and use of new task rules in fronto-parietal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(1):168-182.
17. Gazzola V., Keysers C. The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19(6):1239-1255. (Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't).
18. Gottlieb J. From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition. Neuron 2007, 53(1):9-16.
19. Grefkes C., Fink G.R. The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. J. Anat. 2005, 207(1):3-17.
20. Grol M.J., de Lange F.P., Verstraten F.A.J., Passingham R.E., Toni I. Cerebral changes during performance of overlearned arbitrary visuomotor associations. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(1):117-125.
21. Hagoort P. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9(9):416-423.
22. Hamilton A.F.D., Grafton S.T. Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(4):1133-1137.
23. Hanakawa T., Dimyan M.A., Hallett M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18(12):2775-2788. (Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't).
24. Hartstra E., Kühn S., Verguts T., Brass M. The implementation of verbal instructions: an fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32(11):1811-1824.
25. Hoshi E., Tanji J. Distinctions between dorsal and ventral premotor areas: anatomical connectivity and functional properties. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17(2):234-242.
26. Isoda M., Hikosaka O. Switching from automatic to controlled action by monkey medial frontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10(2):240-248.
27. Mars R.B., Piekema C., Coles M.G.H., Hulstijn W., Toni I. On the programming and reprogramming of actions. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17(12):2972-2979.
28. Mars R.B., Coles M.G.H., Huistijn W., Toni I. Delay-related cerebral activity and motor preparation. Cortex 2008, 44(5):507-520.
29. Mars R.B., Klein M.C., Neubert F.X., Olivier E., Buch E.R., Boorman E.D., et al. Short-latency influence of medial frontal cortex on primary motor cortex during action selection under conflict. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(21):6926-6931.
30. Mostofsky S.H., Simmonds D.J. Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(5):751-761.
31. Nachev P., Wydell H., O'Neill K., Husain M., Kennard C. The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action. Neuroimage 2007, 36:T155-T163.
32. Nakayama Y., Yamagata T., Tanji J., Hoshi E. Transformation of a virtual action plan into a motor plan in the premotor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(41):10287-10297.
33. Oldfield R.C. Assessment and analysis of handedness-Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
34. Petersson K.M., Folia V., Hagoort P. What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax. Brain Lang. 2012, 120(2):83-95.
35. Picard N., Strick P.L. Imaging the premotor areas. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11(6):663-672.
36. Ramamoorthy A., Verguts T. Word and deed: a computational model of instruction following. Brain Res. 2012, 1439:54-65.
37. Rice N.J., Tunik E., Grafton S.T. The anterior intraparietal sulcus mediates grasp execution, independent of requirement to update: new insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(31):8176-8182.
38. Roth J.K., Johnson M.K., Raye C.L., Constable R.T. Similar and dissociable mechanisms for attention to internal versus external information. Neuroimage 2009, 48(3):601-608.
39. Ruge H., Wolfensteller U. Rapid formation of pragmatic rule representations in the human brain during instruction-based learning. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(7):1656-1667.
40. Severens E., Van Lommel S., Ratinckx E., Hartsuiker R.J. Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychol. 2005, 119(2):159-187.
41. Simon S.R., Meunier M., Piettre L., Berardi A.M., Segebarth C.M., Boussaoud D. Spatial attention and memory versus motor preparation: premotor cortex involvement as revealed by fMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 88(4):2047-2057.
42. Taubert M., Dafotakis M., Sparing R., Eickhoff S., Leuchte S., Fink G.R., et al. Inhibition of the anterior intraparietal area and the dorsal premotor cortex interfere with arbitrary visuo-motor mapping. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 121(3):408-413.
43. Tesink C.M.J.Y., Petersson K.M., van Berkum J.J.A., van den Brink D., Buitelaar J.K., Hagoort P. Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21(11):2085-2099.
44. Tomasino B., Skrap M., Rumiati R.I. Causal role of the sensorimotor cortex in action simulation: neuropsychological evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(8):2068-2078.
45. Toni I., Ramnani N., Josephs O., Ashburner J., Passingham R.E. Learning arbitrary visuomotor associations: temporal dynamic of brain activity. Neuroimage 2001, 14(5):1048-1057.
46. Tunik E., Frey S.H., Grafton S.T. Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8(4):505-511.
47. Tunik E., Rice N.J., Hamilton A., Grafton S.T. Beyond grasping: representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. Neuroimage 2007, 36:T77-T86.
48. Waszak F., Wenke D., Brass M. Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings. Acta Psychol. 2008, 127(1):30-35.
49. Wenke D., Frensch P.A. The influence of task instruction on action coding: constraint setting or direct coding?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2005, 31(4):803-819.
50. Wenke D., Gaschler R., Nattkemper D. Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychol. Res. 2007, 71(1):92-106.
51. Wolfensteller U., von Cramon D.Y. Strategy-effects in prefrontal cortex during learning of higher-order S-R rules. Neuroimage 2011, 57(2):598-607.