Ontogeny, systematics, and phylogenetics: Perspectives of future synthesis and a new model of the evolution of bilateria

Biology Bulletin

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 393-401

  Martynov, A V ^a  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BILATERIA;

EID: 84866048204     PISSN: 10623590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S106235901205010X     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Balavoine, G., Are Platyhelminthes Coelomates without a Coelom? An Argument Based on the Evolution of Hox Genes, Am. Zool., 1998, vol. 38, pp. 843-858.
2. Balavoine, G. and Adoutte, A., The Segmented Urbilateria: A Testable Scenario, Integr. Comp. Biol., 2003, vol. 43, pp. 137-147.
3. Baratte, S., Andouche, A., and Bonnaud, L., Engrailed in Cephalopods: A Key Gene Related to the Emergence of Morphological Novelties, Dev. Genes Evol., 2007, vol. 217, pp. 353-362.
4. Beklemishev, V. N., Osnovy sravnitel'noi anatomii bespozvonochnykh (Principles of Comparative Anatomy of Invertebrates), Moscow: Nauka, 1964, vol. 1.
5. de Beer, G. R., Embryos and Ancestors, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1958.
6. Blackstone, N. W. and Jasker, B. D., Phylogenetic Considerations of Clonality, Coloniality, and Mode of Germline Development in Animals, J. Exper. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.), 2003, vol. 297B, pp. 35-47.
7. Carroll, S. B., Grenier, J. K., and Weatherbee, S. D., From DNA to Diversity. Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design, Malden: Blackwell Sci., 2001.
8. Carroll, S. B., Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution, Cell, 2008, vol. 134, pp. 25-36.
9. Chipman, A. D., Parallel Evolution of Segmentation by Co-Option of Ancestral Gene Regulatory Networks, BioEssays, 2010, vol. 32, pp. 60-70.
10. Conway Morris, S. and Peel, J. S., Articulated Halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland and Their Role in Early Protostome Evolution, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. L. (B), 1995, vol. 347, pp. 305-358.
11. Cortijo, I., Mus, M. M., Jensen, S., and Palacios, T., A New Species of Cloudina from the Terminal Ediacaran of Spain, Precambrian Res., 2010, vol. 176, pp. 1-10.
12. Couso, J. P., Segmentation, Metamerism and the Cambrian Explosion, Int. J. Dev. Biol., 2009, vol. 53, pp. 1305-1316.
13. Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Chourrout, D., and Philippe, H., Tunicates and not Cephalochordates Are the Closest Living Relatives of Vertebrates, Nature, 2006, vol. 439, pp. 965-968.
14. Dewel, R. A., Colonial Origin for Eumetazoa: Major Morphological Transitions and the Origin of Bilaterian Complexity, J. Morphol., 2000, vol. 243, pp. 35-74.
15. Dondua, A. K., Biologiya razvitiya (Developmental Biology), St. Petersburg: Izd. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., 2004a, vol. 1.
16. Dondua, A. K., Biologiya razvitiya (Developmental Biology), St. Petersburg: Izd. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., 2004b, vol. 2.
17. Dordel, J., Fisse, F., Purschke, G., and Struck, T. H., Phylogenetic Position of Sipuncula Derived from Multi-Gene and Phylogenomic Data and Its Implication for the Evolution of Segmentation, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 2010, vol. 48, pp. 197-207.
18. Duboule, D., The Rise and Fall of Hox Gene Clusters, Development, 2007, vol. 134, pp. 2549-2560.
19. Dunn, C. W., Hejnol, A., Matus, D. Q., et al., Broad Phylogenomic Sampling Improves Resolution of the Animal Tree of Life, Nature, 2008, vol. 452, pp. 745-749.
20. Dzik, J., Ontogeny of Bactrotheca and Related Hyoliths, Geol. För. Stockholm Förh., 1980, vol. 102, pp. 223-233.
21. Dzik, J., Brachiopod Identity of the Alleged Monoplacophoran Ancestors of Cephalopods, Malacologia, 2010, vol. 52, pp. 97-113.
22. Edgecombe, G. D., Giribet, G., Dunn, C. W., et al., Higher-Level Metazoan Relationships: Recent Progress and Remaining Questions, Org. Div. Evol., 2011, vol. 11, pp. 151-172.
23. Ereskovsky, A. V., Sravnitel'naya embriologiya gubok (Porifera) (Comparative Embryology of Sponges (Porifera)), St. Petersburg: Izd. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., 2005.
24. Ereskovsky, A. V., The Comparative Embryology of Sponges, Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.
25. Erwin, D. H., Laflamme, M., Tweedt, S. M., et al., The Cambrian Conundrum: Early Divergence and Later Ecological Success in the Early History of Animals, Science, 2011, vol. 334, pp. 1091-1097.
26. Fisher, D. W., Small Conoidal Shells of Uncertain Affinities, in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part W: Miscellanea, Geol. Soc. USA, Lawrence: Kansas Press, 1962, pp. 98-143.
27. Garstang, W., The Morphology of the Tunicata, and Its Bearings on the Phylogeny of the Chordata, Quart. J. Microsc. Sci., 1928, vol. 72, pp. 51-187.
28. Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. M., and Raff, R. A., Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Dev. Biol., 1996, vol. 173, pp. 357-372.
29. Gould, S. J., Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1977.
30. Grobben, K., Die Systematische Einteilung' des Tierreiciies, Verh. Zool. Botan. Gesell. Wien, 1908, vol. 58, pp. 491-511.
31. Haeckel, E., Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenztheorie, Berlin: G. Reimer, 1866, vols. 1-2.
32. Hall, B. K., Evolutionary Developmental Biology, London: Chapman Hall, 1992.
33. Holland, L., Kene, M., Williams, N., and Holland, N., Sequence and Embryonic Expression of the Amphioxus Engrailed Gene (AmphiEn): The Metameric Pattern of Transcription Resembles that of Its Segment-Polarity Homolog in Drosophila, Development, 1997, vol. 124, pp. 1723-1732.
34. Hou, X.-G., Aldridge, R. J., Siveter, D. J., et al., An Early Cambrian Hemichordate Zooid, Curr. Biol., 2011, vol. 21, pp. 612-616.
35. Hua, H., Chen, Zh., Yuan, X., et al., Skeletogenesis and Asexual Reproduction in the Earliest Biomineralizing Animal Cloudina, Geology, 2005, vol. 33, pp. 277-280.
36. Isaeva, V. V. and Shukalyuk, A. I., Kolonial'nye kornegolovye rakoobraznye (Crustaceae: Rhizocephala) (Colonial Rhizocephalan Crustaceans (Crustaceae: Rhizocephala)), Moscow: Nauka, 2007.
37. Isaeva, V. V., The Diversity of Ontogeny in Animals with Asexual Reproduction and Plasticity of Early Development, Russ. J. Dev. Biol., 2010, vol. 41, pp. 291-301.
38. Ivanov, A. V., Proiskhozhdenie mnogokletochnykh zhivotnykh (filogeneticheskie ocherki) (The Origin of Multicellular Animals (Phylogenetic Essays)), Leningrad: Nauka, 1968.
39. Ivanova-Kazas, O. M., Bespoloe razmnozhenie zhivotnykh (Asexual Reproduction of Animals), Leningrad: Izd. Leningrad. Gos. Univ., 1977.
40. Ivanova-Kazas, O. M., Evolyutsionnaya embriologiya zhivotnykh (Evolutionary Embryology of Animals), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1995.
41. Ivantsov, A. Yu., Small Vendian Transversely Articulated Fossils, Paleont. J., 2007, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 113-122.
42. Jacobs, D. K., Selector Genes and the Cambrian Radiation of Bilateria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1990, vol. 87, pp. 4406-4410.
43. Jacobs, D. K., Wray, C. G., Wedeen, C. J., et al., Molluscan Engrailed Expression Serial Organization and Shell Evolution, Evol. Dev., 2000, vol. 2, pp. 340-347.
44. Kainz, F., Ewen-Campen, B., Akam, M., et al., Notch/Delta Signalling Is not Required for Segment Generation in the Basally Branching Insect Gryllus bimaculatus, Development, 2011, vol. 138, pp. 5015-5026.
45. Kocot, K. M., Cannon, J. T., Todt, C., et al., Phylogenomics Reveals Deep Molluscan Relationships, Nature, 2011, vol. 477, pp. 452-456.
46. Kolchanov, N. A. and Suslov, V. V., Coding and Evolution of Biological Organization, in Evolyutsiya biosfery i bioraznoobraziya. K 70-letiyu A. Yu. Rozanova (Evolution of the Biosphere and Biodiversity. On the 70th Anniversary of A. Yu. Rozanov), Moscow: KMK, 2006, pp. 60-97.
47. Kröger, B., Vinther, J., and Fuchs, D., Cephalopod Origin and Evolution: A Congruent Picture Emerging from Fossils, Development and Molecules, BioEssays, 2011, vol. 33, pp. 602-613.
48. Larsson, S. G., Reflection in the System of Deuterostomia, Spolia Zool. Musei Hauniensis, 1963, vol. 20, pp. 1-128.
49. Makrushin, A. V., How and why Have the Mechanisms of Aging and Carcinogenesis Occurred: A Hypothesis Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2008, vol. 69, pp. 19-24.
50. Malakhov, V. V., The Origin of Bilaterally Symmetrical Animals (Bilateria), Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2004, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 371-388.
51. Malakhov, V. V., Modern Ideas about the Origin of Metazoans, in Sovremennye problemy evolyutsionnoi morfologii zhivotnykh: Mater. Shk. dlya molodykh spetsialistov i studentov, ZIN RAN (Modern Problems of Evolutionary Animal Morphology: Proc. School for Young Professionals and Students, Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences), 2011, pp. 58-61.
52. Maloof, A. C., Porter, S. M., Moore, J. L., et al., The Earliest Cambrian Record of Animals and Ocean Geochemical Change, GSA Bull., 2010, vol. 122, pp. 1731-1774.
53. Martindale, M. Q., The Evolution of Metazoan Axial Properties, Nature Rev. Genet., 2005, vol. 6, pp. 917-927.
54. Martindale, M. Q. and Hejnol, A., A Developmental Perspective: Changes in the Position of the Blastopore during Bilaterian Evolution, Dev. Cell, 2009, vol. 17, pp. 162-174.
55. Martynov, A. V., From Ontogeny to Evolution: Expectations for Changing Current Systematic Paradigm, in Evolyutsiya i sistematika: Lamark i Darvin v sovremennykh issledovaniyakh: Sb. Tr. ZM MGU (Evolution and Systematics: Lamarck and Darwin in Recent Studies: Collected Papers of the Zoological Museum of Moscow State University), 2009, vol. 50, pp. 145-229.
56. Martynov, A. V., Toward the Synthesis of Taxonomy, Ontogeny, and Phylogenetics: A New Concept of Ontogenetic Systematics, Mos. Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. Allerton Press, 2010, vol. 65, pp. 145-147.
57. Martynov, A. V., Ontogeneticheskaya sistematika i novaya model' evolyutsii Bilateria (Ontogenetic Systematics and a New Model of Evolution of Bilateria), Moscow: KMK, 2011a.
58. Martynov, A. V., From "Tree-Thinking" to "Cycle-Thinking": Ontogenetic Systematics of Nudibranch Molluscs, Thalassas. Intern. J. Mar. Sci., 2011b, vol. 27, pp. 193-224.
59. Martynov, A. V., Biological Systematics Faced with the Choice, Nauka v Rossii, 2011c, no. 3, pp. 32-38.
60. McCall, G. J. H., The Vendian (Ediacaran) in the Geological Record: Enigmas in Geology's Prelude to the Cambrian Explosion, Earth Sci. Rev., 2006, vol. 77, pp. 1-229.
61. McNamara, K. J., Shapes of Time: The Evolution of Growth and Development, Baltimore: Hopkins Univ. Press, 1997.
62. Mikhailov, K. V., Konstantinova, A. V., Nikitin, M. A., et al., The Origin of Metazoa: A Transition from Temporal to Spatial Cell Differentiation, BioEssays, 2009, vol. 31, pp. 758-768.
63. Minelli, A., Perspectives in Animal Phylogeny and Evolution, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009.
64. Miranda, L. S., Collins, A. G., and Marques, A. C., Molecules Clarify a Cnidarian Life Cycle-The "Hydrozoan" Microhydrula limopsicola Is an Early Life Stage of the Staurozoan Haliclystus antarcticus, PLoS ONE, 2010, vol. 5, no. 4, no. e10182.
65. Naimark, E. B. and Ivantsov, A. Yu., Growth Variability in the Late Vendian Problematics Parvancorina Glaessner, Paleont. J., 2009, vol. 43, pp. 12-18.
66. van Name, W. G., Budding in Compound Ascidians and Other Invertebrates and Its Bearing on the Question of the Early Ancestry of the Vertebrates, Bull. US Natl. Mus., 1921, vol. 44, pp. 275-282.
67. Nielsen, C., Six Major Steps in Animal Evolution: Are We Derived Sponge Larvae?, Evol. Dev., 2008, vol. 10, pp. 241-257.
68. Petersen, C. P. and Reddien, P. W., Wnt Signaling and the Polarity of the Primary Body Axis, Cell, 2009, vol. 139, pp. 1056-1068.
69. Pick, K. S., Philippe, H., Schreiber, F., et al., Improved Phylogenomic Taxon Sampling Noticeably Affects Nonbilaterian Relationships, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2010, vol. 27, pp. 1983-1987.
70. Porter, S. M., Skeletal Microstructure Indicates Chancelloriids and Halkieriids Are Closely Related, Palaeontology, 2008, vol. 51, pp. 865-879.
71. Rieger, R. M., The Biphasic Life Cycle-A Central Theme of Metazoan Evolution, Am. Zool., 1994, vol. 34, pp. 484-491.
72. Romer, A., Major Steps in Vertebrate Evolution, Science, 1967, vol. 158, pp. 1629-1637.
73. Rozhnov, S. V., Morphological Patterns of Formation and Evolution of Higher Taxa of Echinoderms, in Evolyutsionnye faktory formirovaniya raznoobraziya zhivotnogo mira (Evolutionary Factors Shaping the Diversity of Wildlife Fauna), Moscow: KMK, 2005, pp. 156-170.
74. Severtsov, A. N., Etyudy po teorii evolyutsii. Individual'noe razvitie i evolyutsiya (Essays on the Theory of Evolution. Individual Development and Evolution), Kiev: Tipogr. Imp. Univ. Sv. Vladimira, 1912.
75. Skovsted, C. B., Brock, G. A., Topper, T. P., et al., Scleritome Construction, Biofacies, Biostratigraphy and Systematics of the Tommotiid Eccentrotheca helenia sp. nov. from the Early Cambrian of South Australia, Palaeontology, 2011, vol. 54, pp. 253-286.
76. Smirnov, S. V., Paedomorphosis as a Mechanism of Evolutionary Change of Organisms, in Sovremennaya evolyutsionnaya morfologiya (Modern Evolutionary Morphology), Kiev: Nauk. Dumka, 1991, pp. 88-103.
77. Teichert, C., Kummel, B., Sweet, W. C., et al., Part K, Mollusca. 3. Cephalopoda, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Geol. Soc. America, Lawrence: Kansas Press, 1964.
78. Temereva, E. N. and Malakhov, V. V., The Evidence of Metamery in Adult Brachiopods and Phoronids, Invert. Zool., 2011, vol. 8, pp. 87-101.
79. Urbanek, A. and Dilly, P. N., The Stolon System in Rhabdopleura compacta (Hemichordata) and Its Phylogenetic Implications, Acta Palaeontol. Pol., 2000, vol. 45, pp. 201-226.
80. Vinther, J., Sperling, E. A., Briggs, D. E. G., and Peterson, K. J., A Molecular Palaeobiological Hypothesis for the Origin of Aplacophoran Molluscs and Their Derivation from Chiton-Like Ancestors, Proc. R. Soc. B, 2012, vol. 279, pp. 1259-1268.
81. Vorob'eva, E. I., Morphological Evolution: Principles of Evaluation, Patterns, and Mechanisms, Paleontol. Zh., 2006, no. 8, pp. 18-33.
82. Vorob'eva, E. I., Evo-Devo and the Schmalhausen Concept of the Evolution of Ontogeny, Biol. Bull., 2010, no. 2, pp. 141-148.
83. Voskoboinikova, O. S., Ontogeneticheskie osnovy proiskhozhdeniya, evolyutsii i rodstvennykh otnoshenii nototenievidnykh ryb (Ontogenetic Basis of the Origin, Evolution, and Kinship of Nototheniid Fishes), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2010.
84. Westheide, W. and Rieger, R., Spezielle Zoologie. Teil 1: Einzeller und Wirbellose Tiere. 2. Aufl., Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 2006.
85. Wägele, J. W., Letsch, H., Klussmann-Kolb, A., et al., Phylogenetic Support Values Are not Necessarily Informative: The Case of the Serialia Hypothesis (a Mollusk Phylogeny), Front. Zool., 2009, vol. 6, p. 12.
86. Winchell, C. J., Valencia, J. K., and Jacobs, D. K., Expression of Distal-Less, Dachshund, and Optomotor Blind in Neanthes arenaceodentata (Annelida, Nereididae) Does not Support Homology of Appendage-Forming Mechanisms across the Bilateria, Dev. Genes Evol., 2010, vol. 220, pp. 275-295.
87. Zakhvatkin, Yu. A., The Succession of Generations and Their Integration, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2008, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 243-263.