Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 147, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 112-118

  Lenarz, Minoo ^a   Sönmez, Hasibe ^a   Joseph, Gert ^b   Büchner, Andreas ^b   Lenarz, Thomas ^b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

adult; cochlear implant; performance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BONE MALFORMATION; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INNER EAR MALFORMATION; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; POSTLINGUALLY DEAFENESS; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SPEECH; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866042806     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812438041     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. House WF, Berliner KI. Safety and efficacy of the House/3M cochlear implant in profoundly deaf adults. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1986 ; 19 (2). 275-286 (Pubitemid 16076363)
2. Wilson BS, Dorman MF. Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear Res. 2008 ; 242: 3-21
3. Rauschecker JP, Shannon RV. Sending sound to the brain. Science. 2002 ; 295 (5557). 1025-1029
4. Moore DR, Shannon RV. Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain. Nat Neurosci. 2009 ; 12 (6). 686-691
5. Hahlbrock KH. Speech audiometry and new word-tests. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1953 ; 162 (5). 394-431
6. Lenarz T Cochlear Implant: A Practical Guide for Children and Adults. Berlin: Springer-Verlag ; 1998 :
7. De Filippo CL, Scott BL. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 ; 63 (4). 1186-1192 (Pubitemid 8344267)
8. Hochmair-Desoyer I, Schulz E, Moser L, et al. MED-EL cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future. Trends Amplif. 2006 ; 10 (4). 201-219
9. Krueger B, Joseph G, Rost U, Strauss-Schier A, Lenarz T, Buechner A. Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today. Otol Neurotol. 2008 ; 29 (4). 509-512
10. Miller AL. Effects of chronic stimulation on auditory nerve survival in ototoxically deafened animals. Hear Res. 2001 ; 151 (1-2). 1-14
11. Scheper V, Paasche G, Miller JM, et al. Effects of delayed treatment with combined GDNF and continuous electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion cell survival in deafened guinea pigs. J Neurosci Res. 2009 ; 87 (6). 1389-1399
12. Bodmer D, Shipp DB, Ostroff JM, et al. A comparison of postcochlear implantation speech scores in an adult population. Laryngoscope. 2007 ; 117 (8). 1408-1411 (Pubitemid 47356844)
13. Wagener K, Kühnel V, Kollmeier B. Development and evaluation of a sentence test in German language I: design of the Oldenburger Sentence Test. Z Audiol. 1999 ; 38 (1). 4-15
14. Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Loiselle LH. Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effect of input dynamic range. Ear Hear. 2007 ; 28 (2). 260-275 (Pubitemid 46673501)
15. Ruffin CV, Tyler RS, Witt SA, Dunn CC, Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT. Long-term performance of Clarion 1.0 cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope. 2007 ; 117 (7). 1183-1190 (Pubitemid 47015667)
16. Herzog M, Schön F, Müller J, Knaus C, Scholtz L, Helms J. Long-term results after cochlear implantation in elderly patients [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2003 ; 82 (7). 490-493 (Pubitemid 36926305)
17. Fu QJ, Galvin JJ. Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures. Hear Res. 2008 ; 242 (1-2). 198-208