Long-term performance of Clarion 1.0 cochlear implant users

Laryngoscope

Volumn 117, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1183-1190

  Ruffin, Chad V ^b   Tyler, Richard S ^a   Witt, Shelley A ^a   Dunn, Camille C ^a   Gantz, Bruce J ^a   Rubinstein, Jay T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult; Cochlear implant; Elderly; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34347334694     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318058191a     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT, Tyler RS, et al. Long-term results of cochlear implants in children with residual hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000;185:33-36.
2. Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler RS, Kelsay DM, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG. Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant and length of device use. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:183-199.
3. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Green J, Roland JT Jr. Long-term effects of cochlear implants in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:505-511.
4. Oh SH, Kim CS, Kang EJ, et al. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:148-153.
5. Manrique MJ, Espinosa JM, Huarte A, Molina M, Garcia-Tapia R, Artieda J. [Cochlear implants in post-lingual persons: results during the first five years of the clinical course.] Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1998;49:19-24.
6. Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Woodworth GG, Lowder MW, Gantz BJ. Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or nucleus cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:508-522.
7. Pasanisi E, Bacciu A, Vincenti V, et al. Speech recognition in elderly cochlear implant recipients. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003;28:154-157.
8. Gomaa NA, Rubinstein JT, Lowder MW, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Ear Hear 2003;24:539-544.
9. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:909-916.
10. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 1999;20:445-452.
11. Battmer RD, Gupta SP, Allum-Mecklenburg DJ, Lenarz T. Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:185-187.
12. Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD, et al. Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:1049-1054.
13. Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Bowditch S, Niparko JK. Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear. Ear Hear 2005;26:7S-16S.
14. Tyler RS, Summerfield AQ. Cochlear implantation: relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996;17:38S-50S.
15. Thornton AR, Raffin MJ. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978;21:507-518.