Debating Abortion, Deliberative Reciprocity and Parliamentary Advocacy

Political Studies

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 643-667

  Weale, Albert ^a   Bicquelet, Aude ^b   Bara, Judith ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abortion; Deliberative democracy; Parliamentary debate

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865865999     PISSN: 00323217     EISSN: 14679248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00928.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bara, J. (2001a) 'Tracking Estimates of Public Opinion and Party Policy Intentions in Britain and the USA', in M. Laver (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge, pp. 217-36.
2. Bara, J. (2001b) Using Manifesto Estimates to Validate Computerized Analyses', 'in I. Budge, H.-D. Klingerman, A. Volkens, J. Bara and E. Tanenbaum (eds), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143-56.
3. Bara, J. (2006) 'Do Parties Reflect Public Concerns?', in J. Bara and A. Weale (eds), Democratic Politics and Party Competition Essays in Honour of Ian Budge. London: Routledge, pp. 105-23.
4. Bara, J., Weale, A. and Bicquelet, A. (2007) 'Analysing Parliamentary Debate with Computer Assistance', Swiss Journal of Political Science, 13 (4), 577-605.
5. Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds) (1997) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
6. Budge, I., Klingerman, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Cowley, P. (1998) 'Conclusion', in P. Cowley (ed.), Conscience and Parliament. London: Frank Cass, pp. 177-95.
8. Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Dryzek, J. S. (2001) 'Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy', Political Theory, 29 (5), 651-69.
10. Greenacre, M. (1994) 'Correspondence Analysis and Its Interpretation', in M. Greenacre and J. Blasius (eds), Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. London: Academic Press, pp. 3-22.
11. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Hibbing, J. R. and Marsh, D. (1987) 'Accounting for the Voting Patterns of British MPs on Free Votes', Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12 (2), 275-97.
14. Jones, P. (1995) 'Members of Parliament and Issues of Conscience', in P. Jones (ed.), Party, Parliament and Personality: Essays Presented to Hugh Berrington. London: Routledge, pp. 141-64.
15. Laver, M. and Garry, J. (2000) 'Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts', American Journal of Political Science, 44 (3), 619-34.
16. Laver, M., Benoit, K. and Garry, J. (2003) 'Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data', American Political Science Review, 97 (2), 311-31.
17. Lovenduski, J. (1986) 'Parliament, Pressure Groups, Networks and the Women's Movement: The Politics of Abortion Law Reform in Britain (1967-83)', in J. Lovenduski and J. Outshoorn (eds), The New Politics of Abortion. London: Sage, pp. 49-66.
18. Lucas, J. R. (1966) The Principles of Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19. McLean, I. (2006) 'The Dimensionality of Party Ideologies', in J. Bara and A. Weale (eds), Democratic Politics and Party Competition Essays in Honour of Ian Budge. London: Routledge, pp. 127-42.
20. Mackie, G. (2003) Democracy Defended. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Mansbridge, J. (2003) 'Rethinking Representation', American Political Science Review, 97 (4), 515-28.
22. Marsh, D. and Chambers, J. (1981) Abortion Politics. London: Junction Books.
23. Marsh, D. and Read, M. (1988) Private Members' Bills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
25. Nishisato, S. (2007) Multidimensional Nonlinear Descriptive Analysis. Boca Raton FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
26. Pitkin, H. (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
27. Popper, K. R. (1972) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28. Proksch, S.-O. and Slapin, J. B. (2010) 'Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches', British Journal of Political Science, 40 (3), 587-611.
29. Reinert, M. (2005) Alceste: Manuel d'utilitisation. Toulouse: Image.
30. Riker, W. H. (1996) The Strategy of Rhetoric. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
31. Sabatier, P. A. (1987) 'Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning and Policy Change', Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8 (4), 649-92.
32. Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (eds) (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Oxford: Westview Press.
33. Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2005) 'Measuring Ideas more Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry's National Security Speeches', PS Political Science and Politics, 38 (4), 701-11.
34. Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2006) From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas and Institutions in Historical Perspective. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
35. Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2008a) 'Does Deliberation Matter in FOMC Monetary Policymaking? The Volker Revolution of 1979', Political Analysis, 16 (4), 404-27.
36. Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2008b) 'The Congressional Debate on Partial-Birth Abortion: Constitutional Gravitas and Moral Passion', British Journal of Political Science, 38 (3), 383-410.
37. Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. and Steenbergen, M. R. (2004) Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Weale, A. (1992) 'Close Encounters of the Third Sector Kind', in S. H. Heap and A. Ross (eds), Mary Douglas and the Enterprise Culture. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, pp. 203-18.