Deliberative politics in action: Analyzing parliamentary discourse

Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-199

  Steiner, Jürg ^a   Bächtiger, André ^b   Spörndli, Markus ^c   Steenbergen, Marco R ^d  

^a European University Institute ^*

^b EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928271933     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511491153     Document Type: Book

References (219)

1. Achen, Christopher H. 1982, Interpreting andUsingRegression, BeverlyHills, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Achen, Christopher H.2001, “An Agenda for the New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
3. Achen, Christopher H. and Snidal, Duncan 1989, “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies,” World Politics 41: 143–69.
4. Ackermann, Bruce and Fishkin, James S. 2002, “Deliberation Day,” Journal of Political Philosophy 10: 129–52.
5. Aldrich, John H. and Rohde, David W. 2000, “The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee,” Journal of Politics 62: 1–33.
6. Angell, Richard B. 1964, Reasoning and Logic, NewYork: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
7. Arnold, Felizitas and Koch, Barbara 2002, “Deliberative Demokratie. Wunsch oder Wirklichkeit? Eine vergleichende empirische Untersuchung der Debatten zur parlamentarischen Initiative 93.434, Schwangerschaftsabbruch. Revision des Strafgesetzbuches,” master’s thesis, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
8. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1973, “Rawls’s Concept of Just Saving,” Swedish Journal of Economics 75: 323–35.
9. Austen-Smith, David 1992, “Strategic Models of Talk in Political Decision- Making,” International Political Science Review 13: 124–52.
10. Austen-Smith, David 1995, “Modeling Deliberative Democracy,” working paper.
11. Austen-Smith, David and Feddersen, Timothy J. 2002, “Deliberation and Voting Rules,” working paper.
12. Baccaro, Lucio 2001, “Aggregative and Deliberative Decision-Making Procedures: A Comparison of Two Southern Italian Factories,” Politics and Society 29: 243–71.
13. Bächtiger, André 2004, “The Real World of Deliberation: A Comparative Study of its Favorable Conditions,” Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
14. Baltes, Paul B., Staudinger, Ursula B., and Lindenberger, Ulman 1999, “Lifespan Psychology. Theory and Application to Intellectual Functioning,” Annual Review of Psychology 50: 471–507.
15. Basu, Sammy 1999, “Dialogic Ethics and the Virtue of Humor,” Journal of Political Philosophy 7: 378–403.
16. Benhabib, Seyla 1996, “Toward a DeliberativeModel of Democratic Legitimacy,” in Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 67–94.
17. Beyme, Klaus von 1997, Der Gesetzgeber. Der Bundestag als Entscheidungszentrum, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
18. Beyme, Klaus von 1998, The Legislator: German Parliament as a Centre of Political Decision- Making. Aldershot: Ashgate.
19. Bobbio, Luigi 2002, “Smaltimento dei rifiuti e democrazia deliberativa,” working paper, no. 1, Department of Political Studies, University of Turin.
20. Bogaards Matthijs 2000, “The Uneasy Relationship between Empirical and Normative Types in Consociational Theory,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12: 395–423.
21. Bohman, James 1996, Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
22. Bohman, James and Rehg, William 1997, “Introduction,” in James Bohman and William Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge, MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, ix.
23. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S. (eds.) 1999, Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
24. Bryce, James 1921, Modern Democracies, 2 vols., New York: Macmillan.
25. Budge, Ian 2001, Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Burke, Edmund 1987, Reflections on the Revolution in France, New York: Macmillan.
27. Button, Mark and Mattson, Kevin 1999, “Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Challenges and Prospects for Civic Deliberation,” Polity 31: 609–37.
28. Chambers, Simone 1995, “Discourse and Democratic Practices,” in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Chambers, Simone 1996, Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
30. Chambers, Simone 1999, “Talking versus Voting: Legitimacy, Efficiency, and Deliberative Democracy,” unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado.
31. Chambers, Simone 2003, “Deliberative Democratic Theory,” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307–26.
32. Chambers, Simone 2004, “Measuring Publicity’s Effect: Reconciling Empirical Research and Normative Theory,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
33. Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1999, “Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe,” International Studies Quarterly 43: 43–83.
34. Chwe, Michael Suk-Young 1999, “Minority Voting Rights Can Maximize MajorityWelfare,” American Political Science Review 93: 85–96.
35. Cohen, Jacob A. 1960, “Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales,” Educational and Psychological Measures 20: 37–46.
36. Cohen, Jacob A.1989, “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,” in Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit (eds.), The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, Oxford: Blackwell, 17–34.
37. Cohen, Joshua 1996, “Procedure and Substance in DeliberativeDemocracy,” in Benhabib (ed.), 95–119.
38. Cox, Gary W and McCubbins Mathew D. 1993, Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House, Berkeley: University of California Press.
39. Czada Roland 2000, “Konkordanz, Korporatismus und Politikverflechtung: Dimensionen der Verhandlungsdemokratie,” in Everhard Holtmann und Helmut Voelzkow (eds.), Zwischen Wettbewerbs- und Verhandlungsdemokratie, Opladen, Wiesbaden:Westdeutscher Verlag, 23–49.
40. Daele, Wolfgang van den 2001, “Von moralischer Kommunikation zur Kommunikation über Moral,” Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 30: 4–22.
41. Dästner, Christian 1995, Die Geschäftsordnung des Vermittlungsausschusses, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
42. della Porta, Donatella 2003, “Democracy in Movement: Organizational Dilemma and Globalization from Below,” paper presented at the Conference on Les Mouvements Alter/Anti-mondialisation, Paris.
43. della Porta Donatella 2004, “Deliberation in Movement: Why and How to Study Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
44. Derrida, Jacques 1995, On the Name, trans. John P. Leavey, DavidWood, Jr., and Ian McLeod, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
45. Deutsch, Morton 1985, Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. Diermeier, Daniel and Feddersen, Timothy J. 1998, “Cohesion in Legislatures and theVote ofConfidence Procedure,” American Political Science Review 92: 611–38.
47. DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W. 1991, “Introduction,” in Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–38.
48. Döring, Herbert 1995, “Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda,” in Herbert Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
49. Dryzek, John S. 1990, Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy, and Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Dryzek, John S.1992, “How Far Is It From Virginia and Rochester to Frankfurt? Public Choice as Critical Theory,” British Journal of Political Science 22: 397–417.
51. Dryzek, John S.2000, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Dryzek, John S.2004, “Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
53. Dryzek, John S. and Braithwaite, Valerie 2000, “On the Prospects for Democratic Deliberation: Values Analysis Applied to Australian Politics,” Political Psychology 21: 241–66.
54. Dunn, William N. 1981, Public Policy Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
55. Eckstein Harry 1975, “Case Study and Theory in Political Science,” in Fred I. Greenstein and NelsonW. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7: Strategies of Inquiry, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
56. Ehrensperger, Elisabeth 2004, “Deliberation, Legitimacy, and Human Rights,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
57. Elgström, Ole and Jönsson, Christer 2000, “Negotiation in the European Union: Bargaining or Problem-Solving?” Journal of European Public Policy, special issue: Negotiation and Policy-Making in the European Union – Processes, System and Order, 7: 684–704.
58. Elster, Jon 1998a, “Introduction,” in Jon Elster (ed.), DeliberativeDemocracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–18.
59. Elster, Jon 1998b, “Deliberation and ConstitutionMaking,” in Elster (ed.), 97–122.
60. Feldman, Stanley, and Steenbergen, Marco R. 2001, “The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for SocialWelfare,” American Journal of Political Science 45: 658–77.
61. Fenno, Richard F. 1978, HomeStyle:HouseMembers in theirDistricts, Boston: Little, Brown.
62. Fiorina, Morris P. 1981, Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, NewHaven, CT: Yale University Press.
63. Fishkin, James S. 1991, Democracy and Deliberation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64. Fishkin, James S.1997, The Voice of the People, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65. Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter (eds.) 2002a, “Special Issue: Debating Deliberative Democracy,” Journal of Political Philosophy 10: 125–229.
66. Fishkin, James S.2002b, “Introduction,” in Fishkin and Laslett (eds.), pp. 125–6.
67. Fishkin, James S. and Luskin, Robert C. 2004, “Experimentingwith a Democratic Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
68. Follesdal, Andreas 2004, “Looking for Deliberative Democracy,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
69. Gabardi, Wayne 2001, “Contemporary Models of Democracy,” Polity 33: 547–68.
70. Garner, Robert 1998, “AnimalWelfare,” in Philip Cowley (ed.), Conscience and Parliament, London: Frank Cass, 117–31.
71. George, Alexander L. and McKeown, Timothy J. 1985, “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational DecisionMaking,” Advances in Information Processing in Organizations 2: 21–58.
72. Gerhards, Jürgen 1997, “Diskursive versus liberale Öffentlichkeit. Eine empirische Auseinandersetzung mit JürgenHabermas,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 49: 1–34.
73. Goodin, Robert E. 1996, “Institutionalizing Public Interest,” American Political Science Review 90: 331–43.
74. Goodin, Robert E.2004, “Sequencing Deliberative Moments,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
75. Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis 1990, “Moral Conflict and Political Consensus,” Ethics 101: 64–88.
76. Goodin, Robert E.1996, Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
77. Goodin, Robert E.2000, “Why Deliberative Democracy Is Different,” Social Philosophy and Policy 17: 161–80.
78. Goodin, Robert E.2002, “Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process,” in Fishkin and Laslett (eds.), 153–74.
79. Habermas, Jürgen 1981, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols., Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
80. Habermas, Jürgen 1983, Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
81. Habermas, Jürgen 1984, Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
82. Habermas, Jürgen 1990, StrukturwandelderÖffentlichkeit.UntersuchungenzueinerKategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
83. Habermas, Jürgen 1991, Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
84. Habermas, Jürgen 1992, Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
85. Habermas, Jürgen 1996a, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. William Regh, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. Habermas, Jürgen 1996b, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
87. Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R. 1996, “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies 44: 936–57.
88. Hammond, Thomas H. and Butler, Christopher K. 2003, “Some Complex Answers to the Simple Question ‘Do Institutions Matter?’: Policy Choice and Policy Change in Presidential and Parliamentary Systems,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15: 145–200.
89. Hasselsweiler, Ekkehart 1981, Der Vermittlungsausschuss: Verfassungsgrundlagen und Staatspraxis, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
90. Hauptmann, Emily 2001, “Can Less Be More? Leftist Deliberative Democrats’ Critique of Participatory Democracy,” Polity 33: 397–421.
91. Holsti, Ole R. 1969, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
92. Holzinger, Katharina 2001, “Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch Argumentieren? Eine empirische Analyse auf der Basis der Sprechakttheorie,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 42: 414–46.
93. Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John D. 2001, Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Parties and Politics in Global Markets, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
94. Hug, Simon and Sciarini, Pascal 1995. “Switzerland – Still a Paradigmatic Case?” in Gerald Schneider, Patricia A.Weitsman, and Thomas Bernauer (eds.), Towards a New Europe. Stops and Starts in Regional Integration, Westport, CT and London: Praeger, 55–74.
95. Hug, Simon and Tsebelis, George 2002, “Veto Players and Referendums Around the World,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14: 465–516.
96. Huyse, Lucien 1971, Pacificatie, passiviteit en verzuiling in the Belgische politiek, Antwerp: StandaardWetenschappelijke Uitgeverij.
97. Immergut, Ellen M. 1992, Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. Ismayr, Wolfgang 2001, Der Deutsche Bundestag im politischen System der Bundesrepublik, Leske und Budrich.
99. Janis, Irving L. 1982, Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos, 2nd edn, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
100. Johnson, James 1998, “Arguing for Deliberation: Some Skeptical Considerations,” in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Kaiser, André 1997, “Types of Democracy. From Classical to New Institutionalism,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9: 419–44.
102. Kameda, Tatsuya, Hulbert, Lorne, and Tindale, R. Scott 2002, “Procedural and Agenda Effects on Political Decisions by Small Groups,” in V. C. Ottati, R. S.Tindale, J. Edwards, F. B. Bryant, L.Heath, D. C. O’Connell, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, and E. J. Posavac (eds.), The Social Psychology of Politics, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 215–40.
103. Kant, Immanuel 1975, Werke in sechs Bänden, ed. Wilhelm Weischedel, vol. VI: Der Streit der Fakultäten, Darmstadt:Wissenschaftliche Buchhandlung.
104. Kant, Immanuel 1984, Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten, in Werkausgabe, vol. VII, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
105. Kant, Immanuel 1994, Critik der practischen Vernunft, reprint of the 1788 edition, London: Routledge.
106. Katz, Irwin, and Hass, R. Glenn 1988, “Racial Ambivalence and American Value Conflict: Correlational and Priming Studies of Dual Cognitive Structures,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 893–905.
107. Keohane, Robert O. 2001, “Governance in a Partially Globalized World. Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 2000,” American Political Science Review 95: 1–13.
108. Kies, Raphael and Jansen, Davy 2004, “Measuring Deliberative Potentialities on Online Forums,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
109. Kitschelt, Herbert 1992, “The Formation of Party Systems in EasternCentral Europe,” Politics and Society, 20: 7–50.
110. Koch, Barbara 2002, “Die Bedeutung des Standorts in der Diskursethik. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Begriff ‘Standort’ von Hannah Arendt in bezug auf die Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas,” unpublished seminar paper, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
111. Kriesi, Hanspeter 1998, Le système politique suisse, Paris: Economica.
112. Kriesi, Hanspeter 2001, “Die Rolle der Öffentlichkeit impolitischen Entscheidungsprozess. Ein konzeptueller Rahmen für ein international vergleichendes Forschungsprojekt,” Veröffentlichungsreihe der Arbeitsgruppe Politische Öffentlichkeit und Mobilisierung, Wissenschaftszentrums Berlin für Sozialforschung.
113. Kriesi, Hanspeter 2004, “Argument-based Strategies in Direct-democratic Vote. The Swiss Experience,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
114. Lamnek, Siegfried 1995, Qualitative Sozialforschung, vol. II: Methoden und Techniken, Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags-Union.
115. Landis, J. Richard and Koch, Gary G. 1977, “TheMeasurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data,” Biometrics 33: 159–74.
116. Lascher, Edward L. 1996, “Assessing Legislative Deliberation: A Preface to Empirical Analysis,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21: 501–19.
117. Lehmbruch, Gerhard 1967, Proporzdemokratie. Politisches System und Politische Kultur in der Schweiz und in Oesterreich, T¨ubingen: Mohr.
118. Lehmbruch, Gerhard 2002, “Quasi-consociationalism in German Politics. Negotiated Democracy and the Legacy of theWestphalian Peace,” in Steiner and Ertman (eds.), 175–94.
119. Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim 1853, Lessings Werke in sechs Bänden, vol. VI: Anti-Goez, Leipzig: Verlag von Gustav Fock.
120. Lewis-Beck, Michael 1988, Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
121. Lhotta, Roland 2000, “Konsens und Konkurrenz in der konstitutionellen Oekonomie bikameraler Verhandlungsdemokratie: Der Vermittlungsausschuss als effiziente Institution politischer Deliberation,” in Everhard Holtmann and Helmut Voelzkow (eds.), Zwischen Wettbewerbsund Verhandlungsdemokratie, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
122. Lijphart, Arend 1968, The Politics of Accommodation. Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, Berkeley: University of California Press.
123. Lijphart, Arend 1975, “The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research,” Comparative Political Studies 8: 158–77.
124. Lijphart, Arend 1984, Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
125. Lijphart, Arend 1985, Power-Sharing in South Africa, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California Press.
126. Lijphart, Arend 1996, “The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation,” American Political Science Review 90: 258–68.
127. Lijphart, Arend 1999, Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
128. Lind, Martin 2000, “Die Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas: Eine Transformation der kantischen Moralphilosophie?” unpublished seminar paper, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
129. Linder, Wolf, 1999, Schweizerische Demokratie: Institutionen – Prozesse – Perspektiven, Bern, Stuttgart, and Vienna: Haupt.
130. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein (eds.) 1967, Party Systems and Voter Alignments, New York: Free Press.
131. Loomis, Burdett A. 1990, Dear Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the U.S. Senate, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
132. Lupia, Arthur 2002, “Deliberation Disconnected: What It Takes to Improve Civic Competence,” Law and Contemporary Problems 65: 133–50.
133. Luskin, Robert C. and Fishkin, James S. 2002, “Deliberation and ‘Better Citizens’,” paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Turin, March 23–7.
134. Macedo, Stephen 1990, “The Politics of Justification,” Political Theory 18: 280–304.
135. Macedo, Stephen 1999, “Introduction,” in Stephen Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics. Essays on “Democracy and Disagreement,” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–14.
136. Manin, Bernard 1987, “On Legitimacy and Deliberation,” Political Theory 15: 338–68.
137. March, James G. and Olson, Johan P. 1989, Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: Free Press.
138. March, James G.1998, “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52: 729–57.
139. Mason, Andrew 1993, Explaining Political Disagreement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
140. McGarry, John (ed.) 2001, Northern Ireland and the Divided World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
141. McGraw, Kathleen M. 1991, “Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts,” American Political Science Review 85: 1133–57.
142. McKeown, Timothy J. 1999, “Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research,” International Organization 53: 161–90.
143. Mendelberg, Tali 2002, “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence,” in Michael X. Delli Carpini, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Y. Shapiro (eds.), Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 151–93.
144. Mill, John Stuart 1991, Considerations on Representative Government, Buffalo, NY: Promethus Books.
145. Mill, John Stuart 1998, Utilitarianism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
146. Morris, Martin 2001, “Deliberation and Deconstruction: Two Views on the Space of a Post-National Democracy,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 34: 763–90.
147. Mouffe, Chantal 1999, “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research 3: 745–58.
148. Müller, Jörg-Paul 1993, Demokratische Gerechtigkeit. Eine Studie zur Legitimit ät rechtlicher und politischer Ordnung, München: dtv.
149. Müller, Jörg-Paul 1999, Der politische Mensch – menschliche Politik. Demokratie und Menschenrechte im staatlichen und globalen Kontext, Basel: Helbing und Lichtenhahn; Munich: C. H. Beck.
150. Nanz, Patrizia and Steffek, Jens 2004, “Assessing the Democratic Quality of Deliberation – Criteria and Research Strategies,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
151. Neblo, Michael 2004, “On the Circulation of Communicative Power in Society: A Structural Taxonomy of Deliberation with Examples,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University, Florence, May 21–22.
152. Neidhart, Leonhard 1970, Plebiszit und pluralitäreDemokratie, Bern: Franke Verlag.
153. Niño, Carlos Santiago 1996, The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, NewHaven, CT: Yale University Press.
154. Noel, Sidney J. R. 1990, Patrons, Clients, Brokers: Ontario Society and Politics 1791–1896, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
155. North, Douglas C. 1992, Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic Performance, San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
156. Orlie, Melissa 1994, “Thoughtless Assertion and Political Deliberation,” American Political Science Review 88: 684–95.
157. Ostrom, Elinor 1998, “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action,” American Political Science Review 92: 1–22.
158. Pelletier, David, Kraak, Vivica, McCullum, Christine, Uusitalo, Ulla, and Rich, Robert 1999, “The Shaping of Collective Values through Deliberative Democracy: An Empirical Study from New York’s North Country,” Policy Sciences 32: 103–31.
159. Pellizzoni, Luigi 2002, “TheMyth of the BestArgument: Power, Deliberation and Reason,” British Journal of Sociology 52: 59–86.
160. Plato 1997, Complete Works, ed. John M. Cooper, Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
161. Posser, Diether 1992, “Aussenpolitik und Völkerrecht im Vermittlungsausschuss: drei Sitzungen im Jahre 1979,” in Stefan Diekwisch und TorstenWolfgram(eds.), Recht und Pflicht: von der Freiheit einesRechtspolitiker, Ronnenberg: Grütter, 86–90.
162. Post, Jerrold M. 1980, “The Seasons of a Leader’s Life: Influences of the Life Cycle on Political Behavior,” Political Psychology 2: 35–49.
163. Powell, Bingham G., Jr. and Whitten, Guy D. 1993, “ACross-NationalAnalysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context,” American Journal of Political Science 37: 391–411.
164. Przeworski, Adam and Teune, Henry 1970, The Logic of Comparative Social Enquiry, New York:Wiley-Interscience.
165. Ragin, Charles C. 2000, Fuzzy-Set Social Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
166. Rawls, John 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
167. Rawls, John 1985, “Justice as Fairness,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14: 223–51.
168. Rawls, John 1996, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
169. Reynolds, Andrew 1999, Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
170. Reynolds, Andrew 2000, “Majoritarian or Power-Sharing Government,” in Markus M. L. Crepaz, Thomas A. Koelble, and DavidWilsford (eds.), Democracy and Institutions. The LifeWork of Arend Lijphart, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 155–96.
171. Reynolds, Andrew (ed.) 2002, The Architecture of Democracy. Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
172. Risse, Thomas 2000, “Let’s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54: 1–39.
173. Roberts, Nancy 1997, “Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction,” Public Administration 57: 124–32.
174. Rosenberg, Shawn W. 2003, “Reason, Communicative Competence and Democratic Deliberation: Do Citizens Have the Capacities to Effectively Participate in Deliberative Decision-Making?” paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 27–31.
175. Rosenberg, Shawn W.2004, “Examining Three Conceptions of Deliberative Democracy. A Field Experiment,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
176. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1966, Ducontrat social, Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.
177. Ryfe, David Michael 2002, “The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: A Study of 16 Deliberative Organizations,” Political Communication 19: 359–77.
178. Saalfeld, Thomas 2000, “Members of Parliament and Governments in Western Europe: Agency Relations and Problems of Oversight,” European Journal of Political Research 37: 353–76.
179. Sabatier, Paul 1998, “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe,” Journal of European Public Policy 5: 98–130.
180. Sanders, Lynn M. 1997, “Against Deliberation,” Political Theory 25: 347–75.
181. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997, Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
182. Schimmelfennig, Frank 2001, “The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union,” International Organization 55: 47–80.
183. Schindler, Peter 1999, Datenhandbuch zur Geschichte des deutschen Bundestages: 1949–1999, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
184. Schmidt, Manfred G. 2003, Political Institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
185. Schmidt, Volker H. 2000, Bedingte Gerechtigkeit: soziologische Analysen und philosophische Theorien, Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
186. Scott, John T., Matland, Richard E., Michelbach, Philip A., and Bornstein, Brian H. 2001, “Just Deserts: An Experimental Study of Distributive Justice Norms,” American Journal of Political Science 45: 749–67.
187. Searing, DonaldD. 1994, Westminster’sWorld.Understanding Political Roles, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
188. Searing, Donald D., Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Crew, Ivor 2004, “Studying ‘Everyday Talk’ in the Deliberative System. Does Democratic Discussion Make Better Citizens?” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
189. Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.) 1986, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Berlin, New York, and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
190. Shapiro, Daniel 1997, “Can Old-Age Social Insurance be Justified?” in Ellen Frankel Paul, FredD.Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul (eds.), The Just Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 116–44.
191. Shapiro, Ian 1999, “Enough of Deliberation. Politics is about Interests and Power,” in Stephen Macedo (ed.), 28–38.
192. Siegel, Sidney 1956, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, New York: McGraw-Hill.
193. Smith, Adam 1991, The Wealth of Nations, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
194. Smith, Adam 2002, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
195. Spörndli, Markus 2004, “DiskursundEntscheidung.Eine empirischeAnalyse kommunikativen Handelns im deutschen Vermittlungsausschuss,” Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern. Published 2004, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
196. Steenbergen, Marco R., Bächtiger, André, and Steiner, Jürg 2004, “Toward a Political Psychology of Deliberation,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
197. Steiner, Jürg 1970, Gewaltlose Politik und kulturelle Vielfalt. Hypothesen entwickelt am Beispiel der Schweiz, Bern: Paul Haupt.
198. Steiner, Jürg 1974, Amicable Agreement Versus Majority Rule. Conflict Resolution in Switzerland, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
199. Steiner, Jürg 1998, European Democracies, 4th edn, New York: Longman.
200. Steiner, Jürg and Dorff, Robert H. 1988, “Analysis of Decision Cases,” in Francis G. Castles, Franz Lehner, and Manfred G. Schmidt (eds.), Managing Mixed Economies, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
201. Steiner, Jürg and Ertman, Thomas (eds.) 2002, Consociationalism and Corporatism in Western Europe. Still the Politics of Accommodation? Amsterdam: Boom Publishing (also published as special issue of Acta Politica 37, Spring/Summer 2002).
202. Stokes, Donald E. 1963, “Spatial Models of Party Competition,” American Political Science Review 57: 368–77.
203. Strom, Kaare 2000, “Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research 37: 261–89.
204. Sulkin, Tracy and Simon, Adam F. 2001, “Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting,” Political Psychology 22: 809–26.
205. Sunstein, Cass R. 1997, “Deliberation, Democracy, Disagreement,” in Ron Bontekoe and Marietta Stepaniants (eds.), Justice and Democracy: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
206. Sunstein, Cass R.2002, “The Law of Group Polarization,” in Fishkin and Laslett (eds.), 175–95.
207. Terchek, Ronald J. and Moore, David K. 2000, “Recovering the Political Aristotle: A Critical Response to Smith,” American Political Science Review 94: 905–11.
208. Thelen, Kathleen and Steinmo, Sven 1992, “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” in Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen, and Frank Longstreth, Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
209. Trechsel, Alexander H. and Sciarini, Pascal 1998, “Direct Democracy in Switzerland: Do Elites Matter?” European Journal of Political Research 33: 99–124.
210. Tsebelis, George 1995, “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism,” British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325.
211. Tsebelis, George 2002, Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
212. Tsebelis, George and Money, Jeannette 1997, Bicameralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
213. Ulbert, Cornelia, Risse, Thomas, and Müller, Harald 2004, “Arguing and Bargaining in Multilateral Negotiations,” paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, Florence, May 21–22.
214. Van Evera, Stephen 1997, Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
215. Varga, Christian 2001, “Grundlagen der Habermasschen Diskursethik,” unpublished seminar paper, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
216. Voigt, Stefan 2001, “The Consequences of Popular Participation in Constitutional Choice – Towards a Comparative Analysis,” paper presented at the Conference on Deliberation and Decision: Discourse Ethics MeetsConstitutional Economists, Wittenberg Center for GlobalEthics, September 24–26.
217. Walthier, Joseph B. and D’Addario, Keyle P. 2001, “The Impacts of Emotions on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication,” Social Science Computer Review 19: 324–47.
218. Wiesli, Reto and Linder, Wolf 2000, Repräsentation, Artikulation und Durchsetzung kantonaler Interessen in Stände-und Nationalrat, Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universit ät Bern.
219. Young, IrisMarion 2001, “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy,” Political Theory 29: 670–90.