Can micro-imaging based analysis methods quantify structural integrity of rat vertebrae with and without metastatic involvement?

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 45, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 2342-2348

  Hojjat, Seyed Parsa ^a   Beek, Maarten ^a   Akens, Margarete K ^a   Whyne, Cari M ^a  

^a Canada   (Canada)

Author keywords

Finite element analyses; Image based quantification; Multi modal image analyses; Spinal metastases; Structural integrity

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS METHOD; CT IMAGE; CT SLICES; FE METHOD; FE MODEL; FINITE ELEMENT MODELING; GROUP ANALYSIS; IMAGE-BASED; LOAD CHARACTERIZATION; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MEAN STRAIN; MEASUREMENT ALGORITHMS; MICRO-IMAGING; MODES OF FAILURE; MOTION SEGMENTS; MULTI-MODAL; MULTI-MODAL IMAGE; NEGATIVE CORRELATION; PREDICTED YIELD; SPINAL METASTASES; STRAIN PATTERNS; STRAIN VALUES; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES; STRUCTURAL RIGIDITY; VERTEBRAL BODY; WEAK CORRELATION; YIELD LOAD;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMAGE REGISTRATION; LOADING; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; PATHOLOGY; RADIOLOGY; RATS; RIGIDITY; STRAIN MEASUREMENT; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY;

STRAIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MICRO MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; SPINE METASTASIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VERTEBRA BODY;

ANIMALS; BONE NEOPLASMS; MOVEMENT; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; OSTEOLYSIS; RATS; SPINE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84865864396     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Burch S., Bisland S., Wilson B., Whyne C.M., Yee A. Multimodality imaging strategies for vertebral metastases in a preclinical osteolytic model. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2007, 454:230-236.
2. Cory E., Nazarian A., Entezari V., Vartanians V., Müller R., Snyder B.D. Compressive axial mechanical properties of rat bone as functions of bone volume fraction, apparent density and micro-ct based mineral density. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43(5):953-960.
3. Entezari V., Basto P.A., Vartanians V., Zurakowski D., Snyder B.D., Nazarian A. Non-invasive assessment of failure torque in rat bones with simulated lytic lesions using computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 2011, 44(3):552-556.
4. Eswaran S.K., Gupta A., Keaveny T.M. Locations of bone tissue at high risk of initial failure during compressive loading of the human vertebral body. Bone 2007, 41(4):733-739.
5. Hardisty M.R., Whyne C.M. Whole bone strain quantification by image registration: a validation study. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2009, 131(6):064502.
6. Hardisty M.R., Akens M., Yee A.J., Whyne C.M. Image registration demonstrates the growth plate has a variable affect on vertebral strain. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010, 38(9):2948-2955.
7. Hojjat S.P., Won E., Hardisty M.R., Akens M.K., Wise-Milestone L.M., Whyne C.M. Non-destructive evaluation of the effects of combined bisphosphonate and photodynamic therapy on bone strain in metastatic vertebrae using image registration. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2011, 39(11):2816-2822.
8. Hojjat S.P., Hardisty M.R., Whyne C.M., Micro C.T. Based highly-automated 3D segmentation of the rat spine for quantitative analysis of metastatic disease. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 2010, 13(3):367-370.
9. Ito M., Nishida A., Koga A., Ikeda S., Shiraishi A., Uetani M., Hayashi K., Nakamura T. Contribution of trabecular and cortical components to the mechanical properties of bone and their regulating parameters. Bone 2002, 31(3):351-358.
10. Kim C.H., Zhang H., Mikhail G., Stechow D., Müller R., Kim H.S., Guo X.E. Effects of thresholding techniques on muCT-based finite element models of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2007, 129(4):481-486.
11. LeRoy B.E., Thudi N.K., Nadella M.V.P., Toribio R.E., Tannehill-Gregg S.H., van Bokhoven A., Davis D., Corn S., Rosol T.J. New bone formation and osteolysis by a metastatic highly invasive canine prostate carcinoma xenograft. The Prostate 2006, 66:1213-1222.
12. McNamara L.M., Ederveen A.G., Lyons C.G., Price C., Schaffler M.B., Weinans H., Prendergast P.J. Strength of cancellous bone trabecular tissue from normal, ovariectomized and drug-treated rats over the course of ageing. Bone 2006, 39(2):392-400.
13. O'Reilly M.A., Whyne C.M. Comparison of computed tomography based parametric and patient-specific finite element models of the healthy and metastatic spine using a mesh-morphing algorithm. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33(17):1876-1881.
14. Pahr D.H., Zysset P.K. A comparison of enhanced continuum FE with micro FE models of human vertebral bodies. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42(4):455-462.
15. Snyder B.D., Cordio M.A., Nazarian A., Kwak S.D., Chang D.J., Entezari V., Zurakowski D., Parker L.M. Noninvasive prediction of fracture risk in patients with metastatic cancer to the spine. Clinical Cancer Research 2009, 15(24):7676-7683.
16. Sigal I.A., Hardisty M.R., Whyne C.M. Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41(7):1381-1389.
17. Wong D.A., Fornasier V.L., MacNab I. Spinal metastases: the obvious, the occult, and the impostors. Spine 1990, 15:1-4.
18. Whyne C.M., Hu S., Lotz J. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three dimensional poroelastic finite-element model. Spine 2003, 28(7):652-660.
19. Whyne C.M., Hu S.S., Workman K.L., Lotz J.C. Biphasic material properties of lytic bone metastases. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2000, 28(9):1154-1158.
20. Won E., Wise-Milestone L., Akens M.K., Burch S., Yee A.J., Wilson B.C., Whyne C.M. Beyond bisphosphonates: photodynamic therapy structurally augments metastatically involved vertebrae and destroys tumour tissue. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2010, 124(1):111-119.
21. Whealan K., Kwak D., Tedrow J., Inoue K., Snyder B. Noninvasive imaging predicts failure load of the spine with simulated osteolytic defects. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2000, 82(9):1240-1251.
22. Windhagen H., Hipp J.A., Hayes W.C. Postfracture instability of vertebrae with simulated defects can be predicted from computed tomography data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25(14):1775-1781.
23. Whyne C.M., Hu S.S., Lotz J.C. Parametric finite element analysis of vertebral bodies affected by tumors. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34(10):1317-1324.