Trends in classification literature: Analysis of literature published during 2000 to 2009

DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 179-185

  Kumbhar, Rajendra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUNE   (India)

Author keywords

Authorship pattern; Bibliometrics; Classification; Prominent authors in classification; Rank list

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865849706     PISSN: 09740643     EISSN: 09764658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kim, K. Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002. Lib. Resou. Techn. Serv., 2003, 47(3), 96-108.
2. Satyanarayana, N.R. Role of classification and cataloguing in the information age. DESIDOC Bull. Inf. Technol., 1999, 19(3), 3-4.
3. Gilchrist, A. From Aristotle to the semantic web. Lib. Asso. Record, 2002, 104(1), 40-42.
4. Field, M. Why classification is sexy. Lib. Asso. Record, 1999, 101(10), 580-82.
5. Slavic, A. Teaching classification to fit a modern and sustainable LIS curriculum: The case of Croatia. Inter. Cata. Biblio. Contr., 2002, 31(1), 13-15. Marcella, R. The role and future of subject classification: The exploitation of resources. Legal Inf. Manag., 2002, 2(2), 3-6.
6. Marcella, R. The role and future of subject classification: The exploitation of resources. Legal Inf. Manag., 2002, 2(2), 3-6.
7. Asundi, A.Y. Reorienting concept classification to electronic information organisation: An exploratory study. Inter. Inf. Commu. Edu., 2001, 20(2), 179-85.
8. Matveyeva, S.J. A role for classification: The organization of resources on the internet. MLA Forum, 2002, 1(2). http://www.mlaforum.org/volumeI/ issue2/roleClassification.html/ (accessed on 20 July 2010).
9. Tyckoson, D.A. Top ten innovations in library history. Against the Grain, 2007, 18(6), 42-43.
10. Hawkins, D.T. Bibliometrics of electronic journals in information science. Information Research, 2001, 7(1). http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/paper120.html (accessed on 15 July 2010).
11. Singh, G.; Mittal, R. & Ahmad, M. A bibliometric study of literature on digital libraries. The Electronic Library, 2007, 25(3), 342-48.
12. Patra, S.K.; Bhattacharya, P. & Verma, N. Bibliometric study of literature on bibliometrics. DESIDOC Bull. Inf. Technol., 2006, 26(1), 27-32.
13. Chandrashekaraj, K.R.; Mulla, N.S. & Harinarayana, R. Bibliometric analysis of literature published in the Emerald publications on digital libraries. Inter. J. Lib. Sci., 2000, 1(10), 20-29.
14. Guo, G.M. A computer-aided bibliometric system to generate core article ranked lists in interdisciplinary subjects. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(17), 3539-556.
15. Wallett, P. A bibliometric analysis of the literature of chemoinformatics. Aslib Proc. New Inf. Persp., 2008, 60(1), 4-17.
16. Krishnamoorthy, G.; Ramkrishanan, J. & Devi, S. Bibliometric analysis of literature on diabetes (1995-2004). Annals Lib. Inf. Stud., 2009, 56(3), 150-55.
17. Palmer, A.L.; Sese, A. & Montano, J.J. Tourism and statistics bibliometric study 1998-2002. Annals Tourism Res., 2005, 32(1), 167-78.
18. Xiaoge, P. A literature review on web automated text categorization technology. J. China Soc. Sci. Techn. Inf., 2009, 28(2), 233-41.
19. Liu, R. Interactive high-quality text classification. Inf. Process. Manag., 2008, 44(3), 1062-075.
20. Humphrey, S.M.; et al. Comparing a rule-based versus statistical system for automatic categorization of MEDLINE documents according to biomedical specialty. JASIST, 2009, 60(12), 2530-539.
21. Satija, M.P. Use of classification and indexing in the Internet organization and search. SRELS J. Inf. Manag., 2006, 43(2), 123-36.
22. Wheatley, A. Subject trees on the Internet: a new role for bibliographic classification? J. Internet Catalog., 2000, 2(3/4), 115-41.
23. Dal, Porto S. & Marchitelli, A. The functionality and flexibility of traditional classification schemes applied to a content management system (CMS): Facets, DDC, JITA. Knowledge Organization, 2006, 33(1), 35-44.
24. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L. & Spink, A. Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of web queries. Inf. Process. Manag., 2008, 44(3), 1251-266.
25. Mondoux, J. & Shiri, A. Institutional repositories in Canadian post-secondary institutions: User interface features and knowledge organization systems. Aslib Proc. New Inf. Persp., 2009, 61(5), 436-58.
26. Lim, E. Southeast Asian subject gateways: an examination of their classification practices. Inter. Cata. Biblio. Contr., 2000, 29(3), 45-48.
27. Foster, J., et al. When is a thesaurus not a thesaurus: The GCHQ story continues. Catalogue & Index, 2001, 140, 12.
28. Zeng, X. Research on representation of Chinese classified thesaurus in OWL and its implied semantic reveal. J. China Soc. Sci. Techn. Inf., 2005, 24(2), 151-60.
29. Park, O. Opening ontology design: A study of the implications of knowledge organization for ontology design. Knowledge Organization, 2008, 35(4), 209-21.
30. Wang, Z. et al. Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation. Journal of Documentation, 2008, 64(6), 842-76.
31. Bradford, S.C. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly, 1934, 3550, 85-86.