A bibliometric analysis of the literature of chemoinformatics

Aslib Proceedings

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 4-17

  Willett, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemistry; Information retrieval; Research

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; DATA REDUCTION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; SOFTWARE PACKAGES;

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; CHEMOINFORMATICS; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; DISCIPLINES;

BIBLIOGRAPHIES;

EID: 38349138503     PISSN: 0001253X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1108/00012530810847335     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allen, F.H., Davies, J.E., Galloy, J.J., Johnson, O., Kennard, O., Macrae, C.F., Mitchell, E.M., Mitchell, G.F., Smith, J.M. and Watson, D.G. (1991), “The development of versions 3 and 4 of the Cambridge Structural Database System”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 31, pp. 187-204.
2. Bajorath, J. (Ed.) (2004), Chemoinformatics: Concepts, Methods and Tools for Drug Discovery, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
3. Bohm, H.-J. (1998), “Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: a fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs”, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Vol. 12, pp. 309-23.
4. Brown, F.K. (1998), “Chemoinformatics: what is it and how does it impact drug discovery?”, Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 33, pp. 375-84.
5. Chen, W.L. (2006), “Chemoinformatics: past, present and future”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 46, pp. 2230-55.
6. Clark, R.D., Strizhev, A., Leonard, J.M., Blake, J.F. and Matthew, J.B. (2002), “Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions”, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, Vol. 20, pp. 281-95.
7. Cooke, H. (2004), “A historical study of structures for communication of organic chemistry information prior to 1950”, Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, Vol. 2, pp. 3179-91.
8. Dunker, A.K., Lawson, J.D. and Brown, C.J. (2001), “Intrinsically disordered protein”, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, Vol. 19, pp. 26-59.
9. Engel, T. (2006), “Basic overview of chemoinformatics”, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol. 46, pp. 2267-77.
10. Ewing, T.J.A., Makino, S., Skillman, A.G. and Kuntz, I.D. (2001), “DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases”, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Vol. 15, pp. 411-28.
11. Fletcher, D.A., McMeeking, R.F. and Parkin, D. (1996), “The United Kingdom Chemical Database Service”, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol. 36, pp. 746-9.
12. Garfield, E. and Pudovkin, A.I. (2004), “The HistCite system for mapping and bibliometric analysis of the output of searches using the ISI Web of Knowledge”, paper presented at the Annual ASIS&T Meeting, Newport, RI, available at: www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/asistposter2004.pdf (accessed 5 October 2007).
13. Gasteiger, J. (Ed.) (2003), Handbook of Chemoinformatics, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
14. Gasteiger, J. (2006), “The central role of chemoinformatics”, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 82, pp. 200-9.
15. Gasteiger, J. and Engel, T. (Eds) (2003), Chemoinformatics: A Textbook, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
16. Gillet, V.J., Willett, P. and Bradshaw, J. (1998), “Identification of biological activity profiles using substructural analysis and genetic algorithms”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 38, pp. 165-79.
17. 2!”, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, Vol. 20, pp. 269-76.
18. Hann, M. and Green, R. (1999), “Chemoinformatics: a new name for an old problem?”, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, Vol. 3, pp. 379-83.
19. Hann, M.M., Leach, A.R. and Harper, G. (2001), “Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 41, pp. 856-64.
20. Jacso, P. (2005), “As we may search: comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases”, Current Science, Vol. 89, pp. 1537-47.
21. Jorgensen, W.L. (2005), “Editorial”, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol. 45, p. 1.
22. Katritzky, A.R., Maran, U., Lobanov, V.S. and Karelson, M. (2000), “Structurally diverse quantitative structure-property relationship correlations of technologically relevant physical properties”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 40, pp. 1-18.
23. Kokalj, A. (1999), “XCrySDen – a new program for displaying crystalline structures and electron densities”, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, Vol. 17, pp. 176-9.
24. Lavine, B.K. (Ed.) (2005), Chemometrics and Chemoinformatics, Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
25. Leach, A.R. and Gillet, V.J. (2003), An Introduction to Chemoinformatics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
26. Leydesdorff, L. (2007), “Visualization of the citation impact environment of scientific journals: an online mapping exercise”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, pp. 25-38.
27. Lindahl, E., Hess, B. and van der Spoel, D. (2001), “GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis”, Journal of Molecular Modeling, Vol. 7, pp. 306-17.
28. Meho, L. and Yang, K. (2007), “Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Early View, available at: www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jissue/76504585 (accessed 5 October 2007).
29. Noordik, J.H. (Ed.) (2004), Cheminformatics Developments: History, Reviews and Current Research, IOS Press, Amsterdam.
30. Onodera, N. (2001), “A bibliometric study on chemical information and computer sciences focusing on literature of JCICS”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 41, pp. 878-88.
31. Onodera, N. (2003), “Research trends of chemical information and computer sciences in Japan observed from the publications at the ‘Symposia on Chemical Information and Computer Science’: a bibliometric analysis of the subjects and the authors' affiliated institutions”, Journal of Computer-Aided Chemistry, Vol. 4, pp. 1-17.
32. Oprea, T.I. (2000), “Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases”, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Vol. 14, pp. 251-64.
33. Oprea, T.I. (Ed.) (2005), Chemoinformatics in Drug Discovery, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
34. Oprea, T.I., Davis, A.M., Teague, S.J. and Leeson, P.D. (2001), “Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A historical perspective”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 41, pp. 1308-15.
35. Pearlman, R.S. and Smith, K.M. (1999), “Metric validation and the receptor-relevant subspace concept”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 39, pp. 28-35.
36. Platts, J.A., Butina, D., Abraham, M.H. and Hersey, A. (1999), “Estimation of molecular linear free energy relation descriptors using a group contribution approach”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 39, pp. 835-45.
37. Rusinko, A., Farmen, M.W., Lambert, C.G., Brown, P.L. and Young, S.S. (1999), “Analysis of a large structure/biological activity data set using recursive partitioning”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 39, pp. 1017-26.
38. Schaftenaar, G. and Noordik, J.H. (2000), “Molden: a pre- and post-processing program for molecular and electronic structures”, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Vol. 14, pp. 123-34.
39. Suhr, C. and Warr, W.A. (1992), Chemical Information Management, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
40. Taylor, R.D., Jewsbury, P.J. and Essex, J.W. (2002), “A review of protein-small molecule docking methods”, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Vol. 16, pp. 151-66.
41. Wang, R.X., Lai, L.H. and Wang, S.M. (2002), “Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction”, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Vol. 16, pp. 11-26.
42. Warr, W.A. (1999), “Balancing the needs of the recruiters and the aims of the educators”, paper presented at the 218th American Chemical Society National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, available at: www.com/warrzone2000.html (accessed 5 October 2007).
43. Warr, W.A. (2005), “Twenty five years of progress in chemoinformatics”, paper presented at the 229th American Chemical Society National Meeting, San Diego, CA, available at: www.warr.com/25years.html (accessed 5 October 2007).
44. Wessel, M.D., Jurs, P.C., Tolan, J.W. and Muskal, S.M. (1998), “Prediction of human intestinal absorption of drug compounds from molecular structure”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 38, pp. 726-35.
45. Wild, D.J. and Wiggins, G.D. (2006), “Challenges for chemoinformatics education in drug discovery”, Drug Discovery Today, Vol. 11, pp. 436-9.
46. Willett, P. (2003), “A history of chemoinformatics”, in Gasteiger, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Chemoinformatics, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 6-20.
47. Willett, P., Barnard, J.M. and Downs, G.M. (1998), “Chemical similarity searching”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 38, pp. 983-96.