Willpower and conscious percept: Volitional switching in binocular rivalry

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Hugrass, Laila ^a   Crewther, David ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPARENT MOTION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; COGNITIVE BIAS; DRIFTING MOTION; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTOKINETIC NYSTAGMUS; PERCEPTION; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; STATIONARY GRATING; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WILLPOWER; ADULT; BINOCULAR VISION; CONSCIOUSNESS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOSEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; TIME;

ADULT; CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMANS; LATENCY PERIOD (PSYCHOLOGY); PHOTIC STIMULATION; SACCADES; TIME FACTORS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOLITION;

EID: 84865829973     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035963     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Crick FC (1996) Visual perception: Rivalry and consciousness. Nature 379: 485-486.
2. Wheatstone C (1838) Contributions to the physiology of vision. - Part the First. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phænomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128: 371-394.
3. Blake R, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3: 13-23.
4. Blake R (1989) A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 96: 12.
5. Wilson HR (2003) A dynamical hierarchy of rivalry stages in vision. Journal of Vision 3.
6. von Helmholtz H (1866) Treatise on Physiological Optics; Southall JP, ed. New York: Dover.
7. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1999) Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 254-264.
8. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G (1998) Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280: 1930-1934.
9. Meng M, Tong F (2004) Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision 4: 539-551.
10. Slotnick SD, Yantis S (2005) Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. Cognitive Brain Research 24: 97-108.
11. van Ee R, van Dam LCJ, Brouwer GJ (2005) Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research 45: 41-55.
12. Ooi TL, He ZJ (1999) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention. Perception 28: 551-574.
13. Chong SC, Tadin D, Blake R (2005) Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 5: 1004-1012.
14. Lack LC (1974) Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry. Perception and Psychophysics 15: 193-200.
15. Hancock S, Andrews TJ (2007) The role of voluntary and involuntary attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Perception 36: 288-298.
16. Paffen CLE, Alais D, Verstraten FAJ (2006) Attention Speeds Binocular Rivalry. Psychological Science 17: 752-756.
17. Brefczynski JA, DeYoe EA (1999) A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nature Neuroscience 2: 370-374.
18. Schall JD, Nawrot M, Blake R, Yu K (1993) Visually guided attention is neutralized when informative cues are visible but unperceived. Vision Research 33: 2057-2064.
19. Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, Sheinberg DL (1996) What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature 380: 621-624.
20. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1996) Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379: 549-553.
21. Goodale MA, Westwood DA (2004) An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14: 203-211.
22. Logothetis NK, Schall JD (1990) Binocular motion rivalry in macaque monkeys: Eye dominance and tracking eye movements. Vision Research 30: 1409-1419.
23. Andrews TJ, Blakemore C (2002) Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 42: 301-309.
24. Fang F, He S (2005) Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience 8: 1380-1385.
25. Maruya K, Yang E, Blake R (2007) Voluntary action influences visual competition. Psychological Science 18: 1090-1098.
26. Beets IAM, Hart BMt, Rösler F, Henriques DYP, Einhäuser W, et al. (2010) Online action-to-perception transfer: Only percept-dependent action affects perception. Vision Research 50: 2633-2641.
27. van Ee R, van Boxtel JJA, Parker AL, Alais D (2009) Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection. Journal of Neuroscience 29: 11641-11649.
28. Alais D, van Boxtel JJ, Parker A, van Ee R (2010) Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry. Vision Research 50: 929-935.
29. Lunghi C, Binda P, Morrone MC (2010) Touch disambiguates rivalrous perception at early stages of visual analysis. Current Biology 20: R143-144.
30. Kohler A, Haddad L, Singer W, Muckli L (2008) Deciding what to see: The role of intention and attention in the perception of apparent motion. Vision Research 48: 1096-1106.
31. Madelain L, Krauzlis RJ (2003) Pursuit of the ineffable: Perceptual and motor reversals during the tracking of apparent motion. Journal of Vision 3.
32. Logothetis NK, Charles ER (1990) The minimum motion technique applied to determine isoluminance in psychophysical experiments with monkeys. Vision Research 30: 829-838.
33. Cavanagh P, Anstis SM, Mather G (1984) Screening for color blindness using optokinetic nystagmus. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 25: 463-466.
34. Sun F, Tong J, Yang Q, Tian J, Hung GK (2002) Multi-directional shifts of optokinetic responses to binocular-rivalrous motion stimuli. Brain Research 944: 56-64.
35. Blake R, O'Shea RP, Mueller TJ (1992) Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Visual Neuroscience 8: 469-478.
36. van Dam LCJ, van Ee R (2006) Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 6: 1172-1179.
37. van Dam LCJ, van Ee R (2006) The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46: 787-799.
38. Konen CS, Kleiser R, Seitz RJ, Bremmer F (2005) An fMRI study of optokinetic nystagmus and smooth-pursuit eye movements in humans. Experimental Brain Research 165: 203-216.
39. van Ee R, Noest AJ, Brascamp JW, van den Berg AV (2006) Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means do not make the difference. Vision Research 46: 3129-3141.
40. Tong F, Meng M, Blake R (2006) Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 502-511.
41. Watanabe M, Cheng K, Murayama Y, Ueno K, Asamizuya T, et al. (2011) Attention but not awareness modulates the BOLD signal in the human V1 during binocular suppression. Science 334: 829-831.
42. Van Ee R (2009) Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: Evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision 26: 2612-2622.
43. Moreno-Bote R, Rinzel J, Rubin N (2007) Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. Journal of Neurophysiology 98: 1125-1139.
44. Klink PC, Van Ee R, Nijs MM, Brouwer GJ, Noest AJ, et al. (2008) Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. Journal of Vision 8.
45. Dehaene S, Naccache L (2001) Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 79: 1-37.
46. Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT, Kanwisher N (1998) Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex. Neuron 21: 753-759.
47. Logothetis NK (1998) Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences 353: 1801-1818.
48. Hohwy J, Roepstorff A, Friston K (2008) Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. Cognition 108: 687-701.
49. Corbetta M, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Ollinger JM, et al. (1998) A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21: 761-773.
50. Lee SH, Blake R (1999) Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39: 1447-1454.
51. Anstis SM, Cavanagh P (1983) A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance. Colour Vision: Physiology and Psychophysics. pp 155-166.