Characterization of structure and function of the mouse retina using pattern electroretinography, pupil light reflex, and optical coherence tomography

Veterinary Ophthalmology

Volumn 15, Issue SUPPL.2, 2012, Pages 94-104

  Mohan, Kabhilan ^a,b   Harper, Matthew M ^a   Kecova, Helga ^a   Ye, Eun Ah ^b   Lazic, Tatjana ^a   Sakaguchi, Donald S ^a,b   Kardon, Randy H ^a,c   Grozdanic, Sinisa D ^d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d Florida Veterinary Specialists   (United States)

Author keywords

Mouse; OCT; PERG; Pupil; Retina

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; C57BL MOUSE; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; OPTIC NERVE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PUPIL REFLEX; RETINA;

ANIMALS; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; OPTIC NERVE; REFLEX, PUPILLARY; RETINA; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

ANIMALIA; MUS;

EID: 84865793681     PISSN: 14635216     EISSN: 14635224     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2012.01034.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Grozdanic S, Betts DM, Allbaugh RA et al. Characterization of the pupil light reflex, electroretinogram and tonometric parameters in healthy mouse eyes. Current Eye Research 2003; 26: 371-378.
2. Grozdanic S, Sakaguchi DS, Kwon YH et al. Characterization of the pupil light reflex, electroretinogram and tonometric parameters in healthy rat eyes. Current Eye Research 2002; 25: 69-78.
3. Grozdanic SD, Matic M, Betts DM et al. Recovery of canine retina and optic nerve function after acute elevation of intraocular pressure: implications for canine glaucoma treatment. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2007; 10(Suppl. 1): 101-107.
4. Panagakis E, Moschos M. Pattern ERG changes in suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 1998; 212: 112-114.
5. Mierdel P, Zenker HJ, Marre E. The pattern ERG in glaucoma: effect of pattern reversal time. International Ophthalmology 1992; 16: 211-214.
6. Price MJ, Drance SM, Price M et al. The pattern electroretinogram and visual-evoked potential in glaucoma. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1988; 226: 542-547.
7. van den Berg TJ, Riemslag FC, de Vos GW et al. Pattern ERG and glaucomatous visual field defects. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1986; 61: 335-341.
8. Papst N, Bopp M, Schnaudigel OE. Pattern electroretinogram and visually evoked cortical potentials in glaucoma. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1984; 222: 29-33.
9. Wanger P, Persson HE. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms in unilateral glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1983; 24: 749-753.
10. Porciatti V, Nagaraju M. Head-up tilt lowers IOP and improves RGC dysfunction in glaucomatous DBA/2J mice. Experimental Eye Research 2010; 90: 452-460.
11. Nagaraju M, Saleh M, Porciatti V. IOP-dependent retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in glaucomatous DBA/2J mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2007; 48: 4573-4579.
12. Porciatti V. The mouse pattern electroretinogram. Documenta Ophthalmologica 2007; 115: 145-153.
13. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma: removal of spiking activity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2000; 41: 2797-2810.
14. Miura G, Wang MH, Ivers KM et al. Retinal pathway origins of the pattern ERG of the mouse. Experimental Eye Research 2009; 89: 49-62.
15. Porciatti V, Ventura LM. Adaptive changes of inner retina function in response to sustained pattern stimulation. Vision Research 2009; 49: 505-513.
16. Maffei L, Fiorentini A, Bisti S et al. Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve. Experimental Brain Research 1985; 59: 423-425.
17. Mafei L, Fiorentini A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science 1981; 211: 953-955.
18. Hull BM, Thompson DA. A review of the clinical applications of the pattern electroretinogram. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics: The Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians 1989; 9: 143-152.
19. Bach M. Electrophysiological approaches for early detection of glaucoma. European Journal of Ophthalmology 2001; 11(Suppl. 2): S41-S49.
20. Ventura LM, Porciatti V. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2006; 17: 196-202.
21. Ben-Shlomo G, Bakalash S, Lambrou GN et al. Pattern electroretinography in a rat model of ocular hypertension: functional evidence for early detection of inner retinal damage. Experimental Eye Research 2005; 81: 340-349.
22. Grozdanic S, Kecova H, Harper MM et al. Functional and structural changes in a canine model of hereditary primary angle-closure glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2010; 51: 255-263.
23. Ofri R, Samuelson DA, Strubbe DT et al. Altered retinal recovery and optic nerve fiber loss in primary open-angle glaucoma in the beagle. Experimental Eye Research 1994; 58: 245-248.
24. Grozdanic SD, Matic M, Sakaguchi DS et al. Evaluation of retinal status using chromatic pupil light reflex activity in healthy and diseased canine eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2007; 48: 5178-5183.
25. Kardon R, Anderson SC, Damarjian TG et al. Chromatic pupil responses: preferential activation of the melanopsin-mediated versus outer photoreceptor-mediated pupil light reflex. Ophthalmology 0161-6420 2009; 116: 1564-1573.
26. Park JC, Moura AL, Raza AS et al. Toward a clinical protocol for assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to the human pupil response. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2011; 52: 6624-6635.
27. McDougal DH, Gamlin PD. The influence of intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells on the spectral sensitivity and response dynamics of the human pupillary light reflex. Vision Research 2010; 50: 72-87.
28. McNeill DS, Sheely CJ, Ecker JL et al. Development of melanopsin-based irradiance detecting circuitry. Neural Development 2011; 6: 8.
29. Tsujimura S, Ukai K, Ohama D et al. Contribution of human melanopsin retinal ganglion cells to steady-state pupil responses. Proceedings Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 2010; 277: 2485-2492.
30. Tsujimura S, Tokuda Y. Delayed response of human melanopsin retinal ganglion cells on the pupillary light reflex. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics: The Journal of The British College of Ophthalmic Opticians 2011; 31: 469-479.
31. Benarroch EE. The melanopsin system: phototransduction, projections, functions, and clinical implications. Neurology 2011; 76: 1422-1427.
32. Markwell EL, Feigl B, Zele AJ. Intrinsically photosensitive melanopsin retinal ganglion cell contributions to the pupillary light reflex and circadian rhythm. Clinical & Experimental Optometry: Journal of the Australian Optometrical Association 2010; 93: 137-149.
33. Do MT, Yau KW. Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Physiological Reviews 2010; 90: 1547-1581.
34. Schmidt TM, Kofuji P. Novel insights into non-image forming visual processing in the retina. Cellscience 2008; 5: 77-83.
35. Grozdanic SD, Harper MM, Kecova H. Antibody-mediated retinopathies in canine patients: mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment modalities. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice 2008; 38: 361-387. vii.
36. Kankipati L, Girkin CA, Gamlin PD. Post-illumination pupil response in subjects without ocular disease. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2010; 51: 2764-2769.
37. Zele AJ, Feigl B, Smith SS et al. The circadian response of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. PLoS One 2011; 6: e17860.
38. Kocaoglu OP, Uhlhorn SR, Hernandez E et al. Simultaneous fundus imaging and optical coherence tomography of the mouse retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2007; 48: 1283-1289.
39. Fingler J, Readhead C, Schwartz DM et al. Phase-contrast OCT imaging of transverse flows in the mouse retina and choroid. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2008; 49: 5055-5059.
40. Srinivasan VJ, Ko TH, Wojtkowski M et al. Noninvasive volumetric imaging and morphometry of the rodent retina with high-speed, ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2006; 47: 5522-5528.
41. Strouthidis NG, Grimm J, Williams GA et al. A comparison of optic nerve head morphology viewed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography and by serial histology. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2009; 29: 29.
42. Wang M, Hood DC, Cho JS et al. Measurement of local retinal ganglion cell layer thickness in patients with glaucoma using frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology 2009; 127: 875-881.
43. Abramoff MD, Lee K, Niemeijer M et al. Automated segmentation of the cup and rim from spectral domain OCT of the optic nerve head. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2009; 50: 5778-5784.
44. Garvin MK, Abramoff MD, Kardon R et al. Intraretinal layer segmentation of macular optical coherence tomography images using optimal 3-D graph search. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2008; 27: 1495-1505.
45. Kim KH, Puoris'haag M, Maguluri GN et al. Monitoring mouse retinal degeneration with high-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Journal of Vision 2008; 8: 17-11.
46. Xu J, Molday LL, Molday RS et al. In vivo imaging of the mouse model of X-linked juvenile retinoschisis with fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2009; 50: 2989-2993.
47. Cebulla CM, Ruggeri M, Murray TG et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in a murine retinal detachment model. Experimental Eye Research 2010; 90: 521-527.
48. Huber G, Beck SC, Grimm C et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in mouse models of retinal degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2009; 50: 5888-5895.
49. Sho K, Takahashi K, Fukuchi T et al. Quantitative evaluation of ischemia-reperfusion injury by optical coherence tomography in the rat retina. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 2005; 49: 109-113.
50. Connolly SE, Hores TA, Smith LE et al. Characterization of vascular development in the mouse retina. Microvascular Research 1988; 36: 275-290.
51. Bowes C, Li T, Danciger M et al. Retinal degeneration in the rd mouse is caused by a defect in the beta subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase. Nature 1990; 347: 677-680.
52. Lucas RJ, Douglas RH, Foster RG. Characterization of an ocular photopigment capable of driving pupillary constriction in mice. Nature Neuroscience 2001; 4: 621-626.
53. Sun H, Macke JP, Nathans J. Mechanisms of spectral tuning in the mouse green cone pigment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997; 94: 8860-8865.
54. Porciatti V, Saleh M, Nagaraju M. The pattern electroretinogram as a tool to monitor progressive retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2007; 48: 745-751.
55. Ben-Shlomo G, Ofri R. Development of inner retinal function, evidenced by the pattern electroretinogram, in the rat. Experimental Eye Research 2006; 83: 417-423.
56. Trejo LJ, Cicerone CM. Retinal sensitivity measured by the pupillary light reflex in RCS and albino rats. Vision Research 1982; 22: 1163-1171.
57. Aleman TS, Jacobson SG, Chico JD et al. Impairment of the transient pupillary light reflex in Rpe65(-/-) mice and humans with leber congenital amaurosis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2004; 45: 1259-1271.
58. Whiteley SJ, Young MJ, Litchfield TM et al. Changes in the pupillary light reflex of pigmented royal college of surgeons rats with age. Experimental Eye Research 1998; 66: 719-730.
59. Kardon R, Anderson SC, Damarjian TG et al. Chromatic pupillometry in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 376-381.
60. de Zavalia N, Plano SA, Fernandez DC et al. Effect of experimental glaucoma on the non-image forming visual system. Journal of Neurochemistry 2011; 117: 904-914.
61. Kankipati L, Girkin CA, Gamlin PD. The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2011; 52: 2287-2292.
62. Hattar S, Lucas RJ, Mrosovsky N et al. Melanopsin and rod-cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice. Nature 2003; 424: 76-81.
63. Fu Y, Zhong H, Wang M-HH et al. Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells detect light with a vitamin A-based photopigment, melanopsin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005; 102: 10339-10344.
64. Hattar S, Kumar M, Park A et al. Central projections of melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells in the mouse. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 2006; 497: 326-349.
65. Brown TM, Wynne J, Piggins HD et al. Multiple hypothalamic cell populations encoding distinct visual information. Journal of Physiology 2011; 589: 1173-1194.
66. Ecker JL, Dumitrescu ON, Wong KY et al. Melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion-cell photoreceptors: cellular diversity and role in pattern vision. Neuron 2010; 67: 49-60.
67. Forte R, Ambrosio L, Bonavolonta P et al. Pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma screening (PERGLA) and retinal nerve fiber thickness in suspected glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Documenta Ophthalmologica 2010; 120: 187-192.
68. Huang Q, Chowdhury V, Coroneo MT. Evaluation of patient suitability for a retinal prosthesis using structural and functional tests of inner retinal integrity. Journal of Neural Engineering 2009; 6: 035010.
69. Freeman SR, Kozak I, Cheng L et al. Optical coherence tomography-raster scanning and manual segmentation in determining drusen volume in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2010; 30: 431-435.
70. Burkholder BM, Osborne B, Loguidice MJ et al. Macular volume determined by optical coherence tomography as a measure of neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology 2009; 66: 1366-1372.
71. Garcia-Martin E, Pueyo V, Martin J et al. Progressive changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer in patients with multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; 20: 167-173.
72. Hajee ME, March WF, Lazzaro DR et al. Inner retinal layer thinning in Parkinson disease. Archives of Ophthalmology 2009; 127: 737-741.
73. Fischer MD, Huber G, Beck SC et al. Noninvasive, in vivo assessment of mouse retinal structure using optical coherence tomography. PLoS One 2009; 4: e7507.
74. Hood DC, Salant JA, Arthur SN et al. The location of the inferior and superior temporal blood vessels and interindividual variability of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Journal of Glaucoma 2010; 19: 158-166.