Coexistence of introduced and native common reed (Phragmites australis) in freshwater wetlands

Ecoscience

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 99-105

  Taddeo, Sophie ^a   De Blois, Sylvie ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

ecological niche; exotic invasive species; invasion pathways; protected areas; St Franois National Wildlife Area; St. Lawrence wetland

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COEXISTENCE; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HYBRIDIZATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LAND COVER; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE; MARSH; NATIVE SPECIES; NICHE OVERLAP; PROTECTED AREA; REEDBED; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

CANADA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS;

EID: 84865773611     PISSN: 11956860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2980/19-2-3468     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Auclair, A. N., A. Bouchard & J. Pajaczkowski, 1973. Plant composition and species relations on the Huntington Marsh, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Botany, 51:1231-1247.
2. Auclair, A. N., A. Bouchard & J. Pajaczkowski, 1976. Productivity relations in a Carex-dominated ecosystem. Oecologia, 26:9-31.
3. Belzile, F., J. Labbé, M. C. Le Blanc & C. Lavoie, 2010. Seeds contribute strongly to the spread of the invasive genotype of the common reed (Phragmites australis). Biological Invasions, 12:2243-2250.
4. Bertness, M. D., P. J. Ewanchuk & B. R. Silliman, 2002. Anthropogenic modifications of New England salt marsh landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99:1395-1398.
5. Brisson, J., S. de Blois & C. Lavoie, 2010. Roadside as invasion pathway for common reed (Phragmites australis). Invasive Plant Science and Management, 3:506-514.
6. Brisson, J., E. Paradis & M.-E. Bellavance, 2008. Evidence of sexual reproduction in the invasive common reed (Phragmites australis subs australis; Poaceae) in eastern Canada: A possible consequence of global warming? Rhodora, 110:225-230.
7. Brouillet, L., F. Coursol, M. Favreau, M. Anions, P. Bélisle & P. Desmet. VASCAN, the Database of Vascular Plants of Canada. Online [URL] http://data.canadensys.net/vascan/ (Accessed on 12 June 2011)
8. Byers, J. E., S. Reichard, J. M. Randall, I. M. Parker, C. S. Smith, W. M. Lonsdale, I. A. E. Atkinson, T. R. Seastedt, M. Williamson, E. Chornesky & D. Hayes, 2002. Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conservation Biology, 16:630-640.
9. Chambers, R. M., K. J. Havens, S. Killeen & M. Berman, 2008. Common reed (Phragmites australis) occurrence and adjacent land use along estuarine shoreline in Chesapeake Bay. Wetlands, 28:1097-1103.
10. Christen, D. & G. Matlock, 2006. The role of roadside in plant invasions: A demographic approach. Conservation Biology, 20:385-391.
11. D'Antonio, C. & L. A. Meyerson, 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis. Restoration Ecology, 10:703-713.
12. Ellstrand, N. C. & K. A. Schienrenbeck, 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97:7043-7050.
13. Engstrom, J., C. Nilsson & R. Jansson, 2009. Effects of stream restoration on dispersal of plant propagules. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46:397-405.
14. Environment Canada. Canadian Climate Normals (1971-2000). Valleyfield, Quebec. National Climate Data and Information Archive. Online [URL] http://climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate-normals/index-e.html (Accessed on 5 June 2010).
15. Gurevitch, J. & D. K. Padilla, 2004. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19:470-474.
16. Haslam, S. M., 1972. Phragmites communis Trin. Journal of Ecology, 60:585-610.
17. Houlahan, J. E., P. A. Keddy, K. Makkay & C. S. Findlay, 2006. The effect of adjacent land-use on wetland species richness and community composition. Wetlands, 26:79-96.
18. Hudon, C., P. Gagnon & M. Jean, 2005. Hydrological factors controlling the spread of common reed (Phragmites australis) in the St. Lawrence River. Écoscience, 12:347-357.
19. Jodoin, Y., C. Lavoie, P. Villeneuve, M. Theriault, J. Beaulieu & F. Belzile, 2008. Highways as corridors and habitats for the invasive common reed (Phragmites australis) in Quebec, Canada. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45:459-466.
20. Keane, R. M. & M. J. Crawley, 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17:164-170.
21. Kettenring, K. M. & D. F. Whigham, 2009. Seed viability and seed dormancy of non-native Phragmites australis in suburbanized and forested watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Aquatic Botany 91:199-204.
22. Lambert, A. M. & R. A. Casagrande, 2006. Distribution of native and exotic Phragmites australis in Rhode Island. Northeastern Naturalist, 13:551-560.
23. Lavoie, C., M. Jean, F. Delisle & G. Létourneau, 2003. Exotic plant species of the St Lawrence River wetlands: A spatial and historical analysis. Journal of Biogeography, 30:537-549.
24. League, M. T., E. P. Colbert, D. M. Seliskar & J. L. Gallagher, 2006. Rhizome growth dynamics of native and exotic haplotypes of Phragmites australis (common reed). Estuaries and Coasts, 29:269-276.
25. LeBlanc, M. C., S. de Blois & C. Lavoie, 2010. The invasion of a large lake by the Eurasian genotype of common reed: The influence of roads and residential construction. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 36:554-560.
26. Lelong, B., C. Lavoie & M. Thériault, 2009. Quels sont les facteurs qui facilitent l'implantation du roseau commun (Phragmites australis) le long des routes du sud du Québec? Écoscience, 16:224-237.
27. Lelong, B., C. Lavoie, Y. Jodoin & F. Belzile, 2007. Expansion pathways of the exotic common reed (Phragmites australis): A historical and genetic analysis. Diversity and Distributions, 13:430-437.
28. Létourneau, G. & M. Jean, 2006. Cartographie par télédétection des milieux humides du Saint-Laurent (2002). Rapport scientifique et technique ST-239. Environnement Canada, Direction générale des sciences et de la technologie, Monitoring et surveillance de la qualité de l'eau au Québec, Montréal, Québec.
29. Maheu-Giroux, M. & S. de Blois, 2005. Mapping the invasive species Phragmites australis in linear wetland corridors. Aquatic Botany, 83:310-320.
30. Maheu-Giroux, M. & S. de Blois, 2007. Landscape ecology of Phragmites australis invasion in network of linear wetlands. Landscape Ecology, 22:285-301.
31. Maheu-Giroux, M., S. de Blois & B. Jobin, 2006. Dynamique des paysages de quatre réserves nationales de faune du Québec: Suivi des habitats et des pressions périphériques. Université McGill, Département des sciences végétales et Environnement Canada, Service canadien de la faune, Montréal, Québec.
32. Marks, M., B. Lapin & J. Randall, 1994. Phragmites australis (Phragmites communis): Threats, management, and monitoring. Natural Areas Journal, 14:285-294.
33. McCormick, M. K., K. M. Kettenring, H. M. Baron & D. F. Whigham, 2010a. Extent and reproductive mechanisms of Phragmites australis spread in brackish wetlands in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland (USA). Wetlands, 30:67-74.
34. McCormick, M. K., K. M. Kettenring, H. M. Baron & D. F. Whigham, 2010b. Spread of invasive Phragmites australis in estuaries with differing degrees of development: Genetic patterns, Allee effects and interpretation. Journal of Ecology, 98:1369-1378.
35. Meadows, R. E. & K. Saltonstall, 2007. Distribution of native and introduced Phragmites australis in freshwater and oligohaline tidal marshes of the Delmarva Peninsula and southern New Jersey. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 134:99-107.
36. Meyerson, L. A., 2007. Saving native Phragmites: Native versus introduced Phragmites australis-What are the differences and why should we care? Bulletin of the Rhode Island Wild Plant Society, 21:1-3.
37. Meyerson, L. A, D. V. Viola & R. N. Brown, 2010. Hybridization of invasive Phragmites australis with a native subspecies in North America. Biological Invasions, 12:103-111.
38. Minchinton, T. E., 2006. Rafting on wrack as a mode of dispersal for plants in coastal marshes. Aquatic Botany, 84:372-376.
39. Minchinton, T. E. & M. D. Bertness, 2003. Disturbance-mediated competition and the spread of Phragmites australis in a coastal marsh. Ecological Applications, 13:1400-1416.
40. Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs du Québec. Registre des aires protégées au Québec. Online [URL] http://www.mddep. gouv. qc.ca/biodiversite/aires- protegees/registre/reg-design/17Parc-nationalquebec.pdf (Accessed on 5 June 2010).
41. Mitchell, C. E. & A. G. Power, 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature, 421:625-627.
42. Modzer, T. J. & J. C. Zieman, 2010. Ecophysiological differences between genetic lineages facilitate the invasion of non-native Phragmites australis in North American Atlantic coast wetlands. Journal of Ecology, 98:451-458.
43. Packett, C. R. & R. M. Chambers, 2006. Distribution and nutrient status of haplotypes of the marsh grass Phragmites australis along the Rappahannock River in Virginia. Estuaries and Coasts, 29:1222-1225.
44. Paul, J., N. Vachon, C. J. Garroway & J. R. Freeland, 2010. Molecular data provide strong evidence of natural hybridization between native and introduced lineages of Phragmites australis in North America. Biological Invasions, 12:2967-2973.
45. Parendes, L. A. & J. A. Jones, 2000. Role of light availability and dispersal in exotic plant invasion along roads and streams in H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon. Conservation Biology, 14:64-75.
46. Ravit, B., J. G. Ehrenfeld, M. M. Haeggblom & M. Bartels, 2007. The effects of drainage and nitrogen enrichment on Phragmites australis, Spartina alterniflora, and their root-associated microbial communities. Wetlands, 27:915-927.
47. Ricciardi, A., 2004. Assessing species invasions as a cause of extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19:619.
48. Saltonstall, K., 2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99:2445-2449.
49. Saltonstall, K., 2011. Remnant native Phragmites australis maintains genetic diversity despite multiple threats. Conservation Genetics 12:1027-1033.
50. Thum, R. A. & J. T. Lennon, 2010. Comparative ecological niche models predict the invasive spread of variable-leaf milfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) and its potential impact on closely related native species. Biological invasions, 12:133-143.
51. Trebitz, A. S. & D. L. Taylor, 2007. Exotic and invasive aquatic plants in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: Distribution and relation to watershed land use and plant richness and cover. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 33:705-721.
52. Tyser, R. W. & C. A. Worley, 1992. Alien flora in grasslands adjacent to road and trail corridors in Glacier National Park, Montana (USA). Conservation Biology, 6:253-262.
53. Vasquez, E. A., E. P. Glenn, J. J. Brown, G. R. Guntenspergen & S. G. Nelson, 2005. Salt tolerance underlies the cryptic invasion of North American salt marshes by an introduced haplotype of the common reed Phragmites australis (Poaceae). Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 298:1-8.
54. Vermeulen, P. J., J. F. Stuefer, N. P. R. Anten & H. J. During, 2009. Carbon gain in the competition for light between genotypes of the clonal herb Potentilla reptans. Journal of Ecology, 97:508-517.
55. Zalapa, J. E., J. Brunet & R. P. Guries, 2010. The extent of hybridization and its impact on the genetic diversity and population structure of an invasive tree, Ulmus pumila (Ulmaceae). Evolutionary Applications, 3:157-168.