Distribution of native and exotic Phragmites australis in Rhode Island

Northeastern Naturalist

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 551-560

  Lambert, Adam M ^a,b   Casagrande, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS;

EID: 33846927678     PISSN: 10926194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1656/1092-6194(2006)13[551:DONAEP]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bertness, M.D., P.J. Ewanchuk, and B.R. Silliman. 2002. Anthropogenic modification of New England salt marsh landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99:1395-1398.
2. Besitka, M.A.R. 1996. An ecological and historical study of Phragmites australis along the Atlantic coast. M.Sc. Thesis. Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Blossey, B. 2005. Phragmites: Common reed. Available online at http:// www.invasiveplants.net/invasivepants/phragmites/nativeandintroduced.asp. Accessed on 14 February 2006.
4. Chambers, R.M., L.A. Meyerson, and K. Saltonstall. 1999. Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquatic Botany 64:261-273.
5. Cross, D.H., and K.L. Fleming. 1989. Control of Phragmites or common reed. US Fish and Wildlife Leaflet 13.4.12. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 5 pp.
6. Hansen, R.M. 1978. Shasta ground sloth food habits, Rampart Cave, Arizona. Paleobiology 4:302-319.
7. Hellings, S.E., and J.L. Gallagher. 1992. The effects of salinity and flooding on Phragmites australis. Journal of Applied Ecology 29:41-49.
8. Kay, S.H. 1995. Efficacy of wipe-on applications of Glyphosate and Imazapyr on common reed in aquatic sites. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 33:25-26.
9. Lambert, A.M. 2002. Morphological characteristics for field identification of native and exotic Phragmites australis. Rhode Island Naturalist 9:11-12.
10. Lynch, E.A., and K. Saltonstall. 2002. Paleoecological and genetic analysis provide evidence for recent colonization of native Phragmites australis populations in a Lake Superior wetland. Wetlands 22:637-646.
11. Marks, M., B. Lapin, and J. Randall. 1994. Phragmites australis (P. communis): Threats, management, and monitoring. Natural Areas Journal 14:285-294.
12. Orson, R.A., R.S. Warren, and W.A. Niering. 1987. Development of a tidal marsh in a New England river valley. Estuaries 10:20-27.
13. Ricciardi, A., W.M. Steiner, R.N. Mack, and D. Simberloff. 2000. Toward a global information system for invasive species. Bioscience 50:239-244.
14. Rice, D., J. Rooth, and J.C. Stevenson. 2000. Colonization and expansion of Phragmites australis in upper Chesapeake Bay tidal marshes. Wetlands 20:280-299.
15. Rooth, J.E., J.C. Stevenson, and J.C. Cornwell. 2003. The influence of 5- and 20-yr-old Phragmites populations on rates of accretion in an oligohaline tidal marsh of Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 26:475-483.
16. Saltonstall, K.□2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype ofPhragmites australis into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:2445-2449.
17. Saltonstall, K. 2003a. Genetic variation among North American populations of Phragmites australis: Implications for management. Estuaries 26:444-451.
18. Saltonstall, K. 2003b. A rapid method for identifying the origin of North American Phragmites populations using RFLP analysis. Wetlands 23:1043-1047.
19. Saltonstall, K. 2003c. Microsatellite variation within and among North American lineages of Phragmites australis. Molecular Ecology 12:1689-1702.
20. Saltonstall, K., P.M. Peterson, and R.J. Soreng. 2004. Recognition of Phragmites australis subsp. americanus (Poaceae: Arundinoideae) in North America: Evidence from morphological and genetic analyses. SIDA 21:683-692.
21. Tucker, G.C. 1990. The genera of Arundinoideae (Gramineae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 71:145-177.