Comparative ecological niche models predict the invasive spread of variable-leaf milfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) and its potential impact on closely related native species

Biological Invasions

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 133-143

  Thum, Ryan A ^a   Lennon, Jay T ^b  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Michigan State University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive exclusion; Environmental filtering; Environmental gradient; Landscape position; Multivariate analysis; Propagule pressure

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC PLANT; BIODIVERSITY; COMPETITIVE DISPLACEMENT; ECOLOGICAL ZONATION; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; HERB; INVASIVE SPECIES; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MONITORING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NATIVE SPECIES; PRIORITIZATION; PROPAGULE;

NEW HAMPSHIRE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ACHILLEA; MYRIOPHYLLUM HETEROPHYLLUM;

EID: 72149120273     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-009-9437-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Boylen CW, Eichler LW, Madsen JD (1999) Loss of native aquatic plant species in a community dominated by Eurasian watermilfoil. Hydrobiologia 415: 207-211. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1003804612998.
2. Buchan L, Padilla D (2000) Predicting the likelihood of Eurasian watermilfoil presence in lakes, a macrophyte monitoring tool. Ecol Appl 10: 1442-1455. doi: 10. 1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1442: PTLOEW]2. 0. CO; 2.
3. Capers RS, Selsky R, Bugbee GJ, White JC (2007) Aquatic plant community invasibility and scale-dependent patterns in native and invasive species richness. Ecology 88: 3135-3143. doi: 10. 1890/06-1911. 1.
4. Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8: 1023-1037. doi: 10. 1007/s10530-005-3735-y.
5. Gerber D, Les D (1996) Habitat differences among seven species of Myriophyllum (Haloragacea) in Wisconsin and Michigan. Mich Botanist 35: 75-86.
6. Halstead JM, Michaud J, Hallas-Burt S, Gibbs JP (2003) Hedonic analysis of effects of a nonnative invader (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) on New Hampshire (USA) lakefront properties. Environ Manage 32: 391-398. doi: 10. 1007/s00267-003-3023-5.
7. Johnson LE, Ricciardi A, Carlton JT (2001) Overland dispersal of aquatic invasive species: a risk assessment of transient recreational boating. Ecol Appl 11: 1789-1799. doi: 10. 1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1789: ODOAIS]2. 0. CO; 2.
8. Kratz TK, Webster KE, Bowser CJ, Magnuson JJ, Benson BJ (1997) The influence of landscape position on lakes in northern Wisconsin. Freshw Biol 37: 209-217. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2427. 1997. 00149. x.
9. Les DH, Mehrhoff LJ (1999) Introduction of nonindigenous aquatic vascular plants in southern New England: a historical perspective. Biol Invasions 1: 281-300. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1010086232220.
10. Levine JM (2000) Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local processes to community pattern. Science 288: 85-854. doi: 10. 1126/science. 288. 5467. 852.
11. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 223-228. doi: 10. 1016/j. tree. 2005. 02. 004.
12. Madsen JD, Sutherland JW, Bloomfield JA, Eichler LW, Boylen CW (1991) The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J Aquat Plant Manage 29: 94-99.
13. Moody ML, Les DH (2002) Evidence of hybridity in invasive watermilfoil (Myriophyllum) populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 14867-14871. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 172391499.
14. Moody ML, Les DH (2007) Geographic distribution and genotypic composition of invasive hybrid watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum × M. sibiricum) populations in North America. Biol Invasions 9: 559-570. doi: 10. 1007/s10530-006-9058-9.
15. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50: 53-65. doi: 10. 1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053: EAECON]2. 3. CO; 2.
16. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52: 273-288. doi: 10. 1016/j. ecolecon. 2004. 07. 013.
17. Ravit B, Ehrenfeld JG, Haggblom MM (2003) A comparison of sediment microbial communities associated with Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora in two brackish wetlands of New Jersey. Estuaries 26: 465-474. doi: 10. 1007/BF02823723.
18. Soranno PA, Webster KE, Riera JL, Kratz TK, Baron JS, Bukaveckas PA, Kling GW, White DS, Caine N, Lathrop RC, Leavitt PR (1999) Spatial variation among lakes within landscapes: ecological organization along lake chains. Ecosystems (NY, Print) 2: 395-410. doi: 10. 1007/s100219900089.
19. Thum RA, Lennon JT (2006) Is hybridization responsible for invasive growth of non-indigenous water-milfoils? Biol Invasions 8: 1061-1066. doi: 10. 1007/s10530-005-5228-4.
20. Thum RA, Lennon JT, Connor J, Smagula AP (2006) A DNA fingerprinting approach for distinguishing native and non-native milfoils. Lake Reservior Manage 22: 1-6.
21. Webster KE, Kratz TK, Bowser CJ, Magnuson JJ, Rose WJ (1996) The influence of landscape position on lake chemical responses to drought in northern Wisconsin. Limnol Oceanogr 41: 977-984.
22. Webster KE, Soranno PA, Baines SB, Kratz TK, Bowser CJ, Dillon PJ, Campbell P, Fee EJ, Hecky RE (2000) Structuring features of lake districts: landscape controls on lake chemical responses to drought. Freshw Biol 43: 499-515. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2427. 2000. 00571. x.
23. Windham L, Lathrop RG (1999) Effects of Phragmites australis (common reed) invasion on aboveground biomass and soil properties in brackish tidal marsh of the Mullica River, New Jersey. Estuaries 22: 927-935. doi: 10. 2307/1353072.