Fragrance material review on anisyl alcohol

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 50, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2012, Pages

  Scognamiglio, J ^a   Jones, L ^b   Letizia, C S ^a   Api, A M ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR FRAGRANCE MATERIALS   (United States)

^b Leah Jones Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

Fragrance material anisyl alcohol; Review

Indexed keywords

4 METHOXYBENZYL ALCOHOL; ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACUTE TOXICITY; CARCINOGENICITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; GENOTOXICITY; HUMAN; LD 50; NONHUMAN; PHOTOALLERGY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; REVIEW; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SOLUBILITY; TOXICOKINETICS; VAPOR PRESSURE;

ANIMALS; ANISOLES; HUMANS; PERFUME; RABBITS; RATS; SKIN; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 84865713316     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: 18736351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.10.012     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Arctander, S., 1969. Perfume and Flavor Chemicals (Aroma Chemicals), vol. I, No. 249. S. Arctander, Montclair, New Jersey.
2. Ball J.C., Foxall-VanAken S., Jensen T.E. Mutagenicity studies of p-substituted benzyl derivatives in the ames salmonella plate-incorporation assay. Mutation Research 1984, 138:145-151.
3. Belsito D., Bickers D., Bruze M., Calow P., Dagli M., Fryer A.D., Greim H., Hanifin J.H., Miyachi Y., Saurat J.H., Sipes I.G. A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of aryl alkyl alcohols when used as fragrance ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2012, 50(Suppl.2):S52-S99.
4. Bray H.G., James S.P., Thorpe W.V. Metabolism of some omega-halogenoalkylbenzenes and related alcohols in the rabbit. Biochemical Journal 1958, 70:570-579.
5. Cadby P., Troy W., Vey M. Consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients: providing estimates for safety evaluation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2002, 36:246-252.
6. Council of Europe, 2000. Partial agreement in the social and public health field. Chemically-defined flavouring substances. Group 2.2 Aromatic alcohols. p. 74, number 66. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
7. Draize J.H., Alvarez E., Whitesell M.F., Woodard G., Hagan E.C., Nelson A.A. Toxicological investigations of compounds proposed for use as insect repellents. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 1948, 93:26-39.
8. FDA (Food and Drug Administration), Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR 172.515. Title 21 - Food and Drugs, vol. 3, Chapter I - Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Part 172 - Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to Food for Human Consumption. Subpart F - Flavoring Agents and Related Substances, 515 - Synthetic Flavoring Substances and Adjuvants.
9. FEMA (Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association), 1965. Recent progress in the consideration of flavoring ingredients under the Food Additives Amendment 3.GRAS Substances. Food Technology, 19 (2), 151-197.
10. Gershbein L.L. Regeneration of rat liver in the presence of essential oils and their components. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology 1977, 15(3):173-181.
11. Gerberick G.F., Robinson M.K., Ryan C.A., Dearman R.J., Kimber I., Basketter D.A., Wright Z., Marks J.G. Contact allergenic potency: Correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. American Journal of contact Dermatitis 2001, 12:156-161.
12. Ford R., Domeyer B., Easterday O., Maier K., Middleton J. Criteria for development of a database for safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2000, 31:166-181.
13. IFRA (International Fragrance Association), 2008. Use Level Survey, December 2008.
14. IFRA (International Fragrance Association), 2004. Volume of Use Survey, December 2004.
15. JECFA (Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives), 2002. Safety evaluation of certain food additives. Who Food Additives Series:48. Prepared by the Fifty-seventh meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). World Health Organization, Geneva 2002.
16. Klecak, G., 1979. The open epicutaneous test (OET), a predictive test procedure in the guinea pig for estimation of allergenic properties of simple chemical compounds, their mixtures and of finished cosmetic preparations. International Federation Societies Cosmetic Chemists, 9/18/79.
17. Klecak, G., 1985. The Freund's Complete Adjuvant Test and the Open Epicutaneous Test. Current Problems in Dermatology, vol. 14, pp. 152-171.
18. Kligman A.M. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test. A procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1966, 47:393-409.
19. Kligman A.M., Epstein W. Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1975, 1:231-239.
20. Larsen W.G. Perfume dermatitis: a study of 20 patients. Archives of Dermatology 1977, 113:623-626.
21. Larsen W., Nakayama H., Lindberg M., Fischer T., Elsner P., Burrows D., Jordan W., Shaw S., Wilkinson J., Marks J., Sugawara M., Nethercott J. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part 1). American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 1996, 7(2):77-83.
22. Larsen W.G. Allergic contact dermatitis to the fragrance material lilial. Contact dermatitis 1983, 9(2):158-159.
23. Miller E.C., Swanson A.B., Phillips D.H., Fletcher T.L., Liem A., Miller J.A. Structure-activity studies of the carcinogenicities in the mouse and rat of some naturally occurring and synthetic alkenylbenzene derivatives related to safrole and estragole. Cancer Research 1983, 43(3):1124-1134.
24. Opdyke D. Fragrance Raw Materials Monographs. Anisyl Alcohol. Food and Chemical Toxicology 1974, 12(1):825.
25. Remaut K. Contact dermatitis due to cosmetic ingredients. Journal of Applied Cosmetology 1992, 10(3):73-80.
26. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc.), 1971. Appraisal of sensitizing powers by maximization testing in humans. RIFM Report number 1805, May 24 (RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA).
27. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc.), 1973. Acute toxicity studies on rats and rabbits. RIFM Report number 2021, February 01 (RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA).
28. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc.), 2005. Anisyl alcohol diluted with vehicle 1:3 EtOH:DEP: Local Lymph Node Assay. RIFM Report number 48750, Anisyl alcohol diluted with vehicle 1:3 EtOH:DEP: Local Lymph Node Assay (RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA).
29. Scheline R.R. The metabolism of some aromatic aldehydes and alcohols by the rat intestinal microflora. Xenobiotica 1972, 2(3):227-236.
30. Schnuch A., Uter W., Geier J., Lessman H., Frosch P.J. Sensitization to 26 fragrances to be labelled according to current European regulation. Contact Dermatitis 2007, 57(1):1-10.
31. Sharp D.W. The sensitization potential of some perfume ingredients tested using a modified Draize procedure. Toxicology 1978, 9(3):261-271.
32. Takenaka, T., Hasegawa, E., Takenaka, U., Saito, F., Odaka, T., 1968. Fundamental studies of safe compound perfumes for cosmetics. Part 1. The primary irritation of compound materials to the skin. "Preprint of Scientific Papaers," The Fifth Congress of International Federation of Societies of Cosmetic Chemists, May 12-17, Tokyo, pp. 313-329.
33. Van Oosten E.J., Schuttelaar M.L.A., Coenraads P.J. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2009, 61(4):217-223.
34. VCF (Volatile Compounds in Food): database/Nijssen, L.M., Ingen-Visscher, C.A. van, Donders, J.J.H. (Eds.). - Version 11.1.1 - Zeist (The Netherlands): TNO Quality of Life, 1963-2010.