The process of reaching agreement in meaning negotiation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7270 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-42

  Burato, Elisa ^a   Cristani, Matteo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; GAME THEORY; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

COMPUTATIONAL PROPERTIES; DIVERSE COMMUNITY; LOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; NEGOTIATING AGENTS; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; SUB-PROBLEMS; TWO AGENTS;

SOFTWARE AGENTS;

EID: 84865712254     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32066-8_1     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., McBurney, P.: Arguing about cases as practical reasoning. In: ICAIL 2005: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 35-44 (2005)
2. Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K., Chorley, A.: Persuasion and value in legal argument. J. Logic and Computation 15(6), 1075-1097 (2005)
3. Bench-Capon, T. J. M.: Argument in artificial intelligence and law. Artif. Intell. Law 5(4), 249-261 (1997)
4. Benferhat, S., Kaci, S., Le Berre, D., Williams, M.-A.: Weakening conflicting information for iterated revision and knowledge integration. Artif. Intell. 153(1-2), 339-371 (2004)
5. Booth, R.: Social contraction and belief negotiation. Inf. Fusion 7(1), 19-34 (2006)
6. Burato, E., Cristani, M.: Contract clause negotiation by game theory. In: ICAIL, pp. 71-80. ACM (2007)
7. Burato, E., Cristani, M.: Learning as Meaning Negotiation: A Model Based on English Auction. In: Håkansson, A., Nguyen, N. T., Hartung, R. L., Howlett, R. J., Jain, L. C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5559, pp. 60-69. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
8. Chang, C.-L., Lee, R. C.-T.: Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press (1987)
9. Daskalopulu, A., Sergot, M.: The representation of legal contracts. AI and Society 11(1/2), 6-17 (1997)
10. Douglas, W. (ed.): Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Routledge (1996)
11. Douglas, W. (ed.): Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law. Cambridge University Press (2005)
12. Douglas, W., Christopher, R., Fabrizio, M. (eds.): Argumentation Schemes. Springer (2008)
13. Dung, P. M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321-357 (1995)
14. Dung, P. M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Computing ideal sceptical argumentation. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15), 642-674 (2007)
15. Farley, A. M., Freeman, K.: Burden of proof in legal argumentation. In: ICAIL 1995: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 156-164. ACM, New York (1995)
16. Fermé, E., Rott, H.: Revision by comparison. Artif. Intell. 157(1-2), 5-47 (2004)
17. Gordon, T. F.: The pleadings game: formalizing procedural justice. In: ICAIL 1993: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 10-19. ACM, New York (1993)
18. Gordon, T. F., Prakken, H., Walton, D.: The carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence 171(10-15), 875-896 (2007)
19. Gordon, T. F., Walton, D.: Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In: ICAIL 2009: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 137-146. ACM, New York (2009)
20. Grégoire, E.: An unbiased approach to iterated fusion by weakening. Inf. Fusion 7(1), 35-40 (2006)
21. Grégoire, E., Konieczny, S.: Logic-based approaches to information fusion. Inf. Fusion 7(1), 4-18 (2006)
22. Hunter, A., Summerton, R.: A knowledge-based approach to merging information. Knowledge-Based Systems 19(8), 647-674 (2006)
23. Iván, C. C., Maguitman, A. G., Loui, R. P.: Logical models of argument. ACM Comput. Surv. 32(4), 337-383 (2000)
24. Kambe, S.: Bargaining with imperfect commitment. Games and Economic Behavior 28(2), 217-237 (1995)
25. Kambe, S.: Bargaining with imperfect commitment. Games and Economic Behavior 28(2), 217-237 (1995)
26. McBurney, P., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Justifying practical reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2004), pp. 87-90 (2004)
27. Konieczny, S.: On the difference between merging knowledge bases and combining them. In: KR, pp. 135-144 (2000)
28. Kowalski, R. A., Toni, F.: Abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4, 275-296 (1996)
29. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104(1-2), 1-69 (1998)
30. Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: Arbitration (or how to merge knowledge bases). IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 10(1), 76-90 (1998)
31. Lin, J.: Integration of weighted knowledge bases. Artificial Intelligence 83(2), 363-378 (1996)
32. Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I.: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: Context and Recent Developments. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4766, pp. 1-16. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
33. Nash, J.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2), 155-162 (1950)
34. Oren, N., Norman, T. J., Preece, A.: Subjective logic and arguing with evidence. Artificial Intelligence 171(10-15), 838-854 (2007)
35. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. J. Logic and Computation 8(3), 261-292 (1998)
36. Pollock, J. L.: Justification and defeat. Artificial Intelligence 67(2), 377-407 (1994)
37. Pollock, J. L.: Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence 133(1-2), 233-282 (2001)
38. Prakken, H., Reed, C., Walton, D.: Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence. In: ICAIL 2003: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 32-41. ACM Press, New York (2003)
39. Prakken, H., Reed, C., Walton, D.: Dialogues about the burden of proof. In: ICAIL 2005: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 115-124. ACM, New York (2005)
40. Rubinelli, S.: Let me tell you why! when argumentation in doctor-patient interaction makes a difference. Argumentation 20(3), 353-375 (2006)
41. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1), 97-110 (1982)
42. Schroeder, M., Schweimeier, R.: Arguments and misunderstandings: Fuzzy unification for negotiating agents. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 70(5), 1-19 (2002)
43. Thakur, S. S., Governatori, G., Padmanabhan, V., Eriksson Lundström, J.: Dialogue Games in Defeasible Logic. In: Orgun, M. A., Thornton, J. (eds.) AI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4830, pp. 497-506. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
44. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambrigde University Press (2003)
45. van Eemeren, F. H. (ed.): Advances in pragma-dialectics. SicSat/Newport News, Vale Press, Amsterdam, VA (2002)
46. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (eds.): Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Floris Publications, Dordrecht (1984)
47. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (eds.): Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)
48. van Eemerena, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (eds.): A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
49. Walton, D.: Is there a burden of questioning? Artif. Intell. Law 11(1), 1-43 (2003)
50. Walton, D.: Justification of argument schemes. The Australasian Journal of Logic 3, 1-13 (2005)
51. Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue. State University of New York Press (1995)
52. Wurman, P., Wellman, M., Walsh, W.: A parametrization of the auction design space. Games and Economic Behavior 35(1-2), 304-338 (2001)
53. Zhang, D., Foo, N., Meyer, T., Kwok, R.: Negotiation as mutual belief revision. In: AAAI 2004: Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 317-322. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (2004)