Dialogues about the burden of proof

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 115-124

  Prakken, Henry ^a   Reed, Chris ^b   Walton, Douglas ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES; BURDEN OF PROOF; DEFEASIBLE RULES; DIALOGUE GAME PROTOCOLS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 77950384618     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1165485.1165503     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. J. Barwise and L. Moss. Vicious Circles. Number 60 in CSLI Lecture Notes. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 1996.
2. T.J.M. Bench-Capon, T. Geldard, and P.H. Leng. A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 8:233-254, 2000.
3. F.J. Bex and H. Prakken. Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference, pages 119-129, Amsterdam etc, 2004. IOS Press.
4. F.J. Bex, H. Prakken, C. Reed, and D.N. Walton. Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12:125-165, 2003.
5. T.F. Gordon. The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1995.
6. K. Greenwood, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, and McBurney. Towards a computational account of persuasion in law. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 22-31, New York, 2003. ACM Press.
7. R.E. Leenes. Burden of proof in dialogue games and Dutch civil procedure. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 109-118, New York, 2001. ACM Press.
8. A.R. Lodder. DiaLaw. On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Law and Philosophy Library. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1999.
9. R.P. Loui and J. Norman. Rationales and argument moves. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 3:159-189, 1995.
10. J.D. Mackenzie. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8:117-133, 1979.
11. J.L. Pollock. Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
12. H. Prakken. On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence (JELIA'2000), number 1919 in Springer Lecture Notes in AI, pages 224-238, Berlin, 2000. Springer Verlag.
13. H. Prakken. Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 119-128, New York, 2001. ACM Press.
14. H. Prakken. Coherence and flexibility in two-person dialogue games for argumentation. Technical report, Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 2005.
15. H. Prakken, C. Reed, and D.N. Walton. Argumentation schemes and burden of proof. In Proceedings of the ECAI-2004 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, pages 81-86, 2004.
16. G. Sartor. Defeasibility in legal reasoning. In Z. Bankowski, I. White, and U. Hahn, editors, Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning, Law and Philosophy Library, pages 119-157. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1995.
17. B. Verheij. Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11:167-195, 2003.
18. G.A.W. Vreeswijk. Abstract argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence, 90:225-279, 1997.
19. D.N. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.
20. D.N. Walton. Appeal to Expert Opinion. Penn State Press, University Press, 1997.
21. D.N. Walton. Is there a burden of questioning? Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11:1-43, 2003.
22. D.N. Walton and E.C.W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1995.