Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2012, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Shi, Gang ^a   Lu, Donghao ^b   Liu, Zhihong ^c   Liu, Dan ^c   Zhou, Xiaoyan ^c  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865684933     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008640.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Advincula AP, Xiao Xu, Goudeau S, Ransom SB. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2007;14(6):698-705.
2. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111(3):407-11.
3. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al.A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008;199(4):357.e1-7.
4. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al.A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008;199(4):360.e1-9.
5. Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experience. Gynecologic Oncology 2010;117(2):260-5.
6. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center. Gynecologic Oncology 2010;117(2):224-8. [PUBMED: 20144471]
7. DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE 4th, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111(3):412-7. [PUBMED: 18834620]
8. Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, Estape E, Dunkin N, Rivera A. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecologic Oncology 2009;113(3):357-61. [PUBMED: 19345987]
9. Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, Abaid LN, Mendivil A, Boggess JF. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111(1):41-5.
10. Geisler JP, Orr CJ, Khurshid N, Phibbs G, Manahan KJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society 2010;20(3):438-42. [PUBMED: 20375811]
11. Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Rademaker A, Singh DK, Buttin BM, Lurain JR, et al.The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2009;5(4):392-7. [PUBMED: 19455550]
12. Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim JW, et al.Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010;101(2):116-21. [PUBMED: 19902479]
13. Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111(3):425-30. [PUBMED: 18929400]
14. Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, Walz J, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Gurriet B, et al.Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Surgical Endoscopy 2008;22(12):2743-7.
15. Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Bannier M, Jauffret C, Pouget N, Leblanc E, et al.Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in adjuvant surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010;36(4):409-13. [PUBMED: 20079599]
16. Maggioni A, Minig L, Zanagnolo V, Peiretti M, Sanguineti F, Bocciolone L, et al.Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study. Gynecologic Oncology 2009;115(1):60-4. [PUBMED: 19638333]
17. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;109(1):86-91.
18. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2008;12(3):227-37.
19. Persson J, Reynisson P, Borgfeldt C, Kannisto P, Lindahl B, Bossmar T. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecologic Oncology 2009;113(2):185-90. [PUBMED: 19251308]
20. Ramirez PT. Robotic radical hysterectomy: a new standard of care?. Future Oncology 2009;5(1):23-5.
21. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, et al.Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?. Gynecologic Oncology 2009;113(1):36-41. [PUBMED: 19168206]
22. Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS, Kimball KJ, Huh WK, Fowler JM, et al.Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;114(1):16-21. [PUBMED: 19546753]
23. Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2007;3(3):224-8.
24. Sert MB. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity. Gynecologic Oncology 2009; Vol. 115, issue 1:164-5; author reply 165-6. [PUBMED: 19539356]
25. Sert MB. Comparison between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH): A case control study from EIO/Milan. Gynecologic Oncology 2010;117(2):389.
26. Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, Everett EN, Shah C, Peters III WA. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008;198(6):679.e1-10.
27. Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2008;15(5):584-8.
28. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/STT_0.asp. Accessed September 14, 2009.
29. Boike GM, Elfstrand EP, DelPriore G, Schumock D, Holley HS, Lurain JR. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: report of 82 cases and comparison with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;168(6 Pt 1):1690-7.
30. Statistical Information Team of Cancer Research UK. UK Ovarian Cancer incidence statistics. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/incidence/#source11 2009.
31. Cho JE, Nezhat FR. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2009;16(6):669-81.
32. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. 2nd Edition. London: BMJ Publication Group, 2001.
33. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7:177-88.
34. Diaz JP, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, Zivanovic O, Brown CL, Chi DS, et al.Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111(2):255-60.
35. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertility and Sterility 2000;73(5):1040-2.
36. Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M. Robotic radical hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008;198(6):649.e1-4.
37. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. European Urology 2007;51(1):45-55; discussion 56.
38. Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C. Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surgical Endoscopy 2007;21(2):244-6.
39. Geisler JP, Orr CJ, Manahan KJ. Robotically assisted total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for fertility sparing in stage IB1 adenosarcoma of the cervix. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A 2008;18(5):727-9.
40. GLOBOCAN . Cervical Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide in 2008. http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheets/cancers/cervix.asp 2008.
41. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
42. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2008; Vol. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
43. Holloway RW, Patel SD, Ahmad S. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 2009;98(2):96-109.
44. Holloway RW, Ahmad S, DeNardis SA, Peterson LB, Sultana N, Bigsby GE 4th, et al.Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: analysis of surgical performance. Gynecologic Oncology 2009;115(3):447-52.
45. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61(2):69-90.
46. Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, Lee SJ, Nam EJ, Lee WJ. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;108(2):312-6.
47. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2008;15(5):589-94.
48. Lo L, Pun TC, Chan S. Tubal ectopic pregnancy: an evaluation of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy in 614 patients. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1999;39(2):185-7.
49. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2009;113(2):191-4.
50. Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Human Reproduction 1998;3(10):2748-50.
51. Moy ML, Byun SY. Role of robotic surgery in urogynecologic surgery. Current Opinion in Urology 2010;20(1):70-4.
52. Oehler MK. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2009;49(2):124-9.
53. Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998;17(24):2815-34.
54. Persson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T. Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111(3):564-7.
55. Piver M, Lee J. Epidemiologic perspective of ovarian cancer. Global library of women's medicine (ISSN: 1756-2228) 2008. [DOI: 10.3843/GLOWM.10245]
56. Plante M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111 Suppl 1(2):105-10.
57. Raju KS, Auld BJ. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy--implications for gynecologic practice in the United Kingdom. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1994;1(2):111-5.
58. Reynolds RK, Burke WM, Advincula AP. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic staging of gynecologic malignancies. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons/Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2005;9(2):149-58.
59. Shafer A, Boggess JF. Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111 Suppl(2):18-23.
60. Vergote I, Pouseele B, Van Gorp T, Vanacker B, Leunen K, Cadron I, et al.Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2008;87(7):783-7.
61. Yuen PM, Yu KM, Yip SK, Lau WC, Rogers MS, Chang A. A randomized prospective study of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of benign ovarian masses. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;177(1):109-14.