Visualizing multiple word similarity measures

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 656-674

  Kievit Kylar, Brent ^a   Jones, Michael N ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corpus based models; Latent semantic analysis; Semantic similarity space; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84865655891     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0236-7     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116, 463-498. doi: 10. 1037/a0016261.
2. Balota, D. A., & Lorch, R. F. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 336-345. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 12. 3. 336.
3. Baroni, M., & Lenci, A. (2010). Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36, 673-721. doi: 10. 1162/coli_a_00016.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain's modal systems. In G. R. Sermin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 9-42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(3, Pt. 2), 1-46. doi: 10. 1037/h0027577.
6. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255.
7. Bullinaria, J. A., & Levy, J. P. (2007). Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 510-526. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193020.
8. Busemeyer, J. R., & Diedrich, A. (2010). Cognitive modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
9. Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Chen, C. (1999). Information visualisation and virtual environments. Berlin: Springer.
11. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211. doi: 10. 1207/s15516709cog1402_1.
12. Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Foltz, P. W., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Reasoning from multiple texts: An automatic analysis of readers' situation models. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 110-115). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
14. Friendly, M. (2008). A brief history of data visualization. New York: Springer.
15. Gershon, N., Eick, S. G., & Card, S. (1998). Information visualization. Interactions, 5(2), 9-15.
16. González, V., & Kobsa, A. (2003). Benefits of information visualization systems for administrative data analysts. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Visualization (pp. 331-336). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
17. Gorman, J. C., Foltz, P. W., Kieke, P. A., Martin, M. J., & Cooke, N. J. (2003). Evaluation of latent semantic analysis-based measures of team communications content. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting October 2003 (Vol. 47, pp. 424-428). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
18. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193-202. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195564.
19. Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211-244. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 114. 2. 211.
20. Harris, Z. S. (1970). Papers in structural and transformational linguistics (Formal Linguistics Series, Vol. 1). New York: Humanities Press.
21. Holtzman, N. S., Schott, J. P., Jones, M. N., Balota, D. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2011). Exploring media bias with semantic analysis tools: Validation of the Contrast Analysis of Semantic Similarity (CASS). Behavior Research Methods, 43, 193-200. doi: 10. 3758/s13428-010-0026-z.
22. Hu, X., Cai, Z., Graesser, A. C., & Ventura, M. (2005). Similarity between semantic spaces. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 995-1000). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
23. Hughes, T., Hughes, C., & Lazar, A. (2008). Epistemic structured representation for legal transcript analysis. Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering, 101-107.
24. Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Predicting semantic priming at the item level. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1036-1066. doi: 10. 1080/17470210701438111.
25. Johns, B. T., & Jones, M. N. (2010). Evaluating the random representation assumption of lexical semantics in cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 662-672. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 17. 5. 662.
26. Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1-37. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 114. 1. 1.
27. Jones, M. N., & Recchia, G. L. (2010). You can't wear a coat rack: A binding framework to avoid illusory feature migrations in perceptually grounded semantic models. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 877-882). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
28. Jones, M. N., Kintsch, W., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2006). High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 534-552.
29. Jones, M. N., Gruenenfelder, T. M., & Recchia, G. (2011). In defense of spatial models of lexical semantics. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3444-3449). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
30. Jurgens, D., & Stevens, K. (2010). The S-Space package: An open source package for word space models. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 System Demonstrations (pp. 30-35). Washington, DC: Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. Kievit-Kylar, B., & Jones, M. N. (2011). The semantic Pictionary project. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2229-2234). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
32. Kintsch, W., & Mangalath, P. (2011). The construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 346-370. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1756-8765. 2010. 01107. x.
33. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 104. 2. 211.
34. Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
35. Lewandowsky, S., & Farrell, S. (2011). Computational modeling in cognition: Principles and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
36. Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203-208. doi: 10. 3758/BF03204766.
37. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
38. Maki, W. S., & Buchanan, E. (2008). Latent structure in measures of associative, semantic, and thematic knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 598-603. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 15. 3. 598.
39. Maki, W. S., McKinley, L. N., & Thompson, A. G. (2004). Semantic distance norms computed from an electronic dictionary (WordNet). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 421-431. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195590.
40. McCarthy, P. M., & Boonthum-Denecke, C. (2011). Applied natural language processing: Identification, investigation, and resolution. Hershey: IGI Global.
41. McCarthy, P. M., Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2006, July). Distinguishing genre using Coh-Metrix indices of cohesion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse, Minneapolis, MN.
42. McNamara, T. P., & Altarriba, J. (1988). Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 545-559.
43. McRae, K., & Jones, M. N. (2012). Semantic memory. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (in press).
44. McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547-559. doi: 10. 3758/BF03192726.
45. Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: An on-line lexical database. [Special issue]. International Journal of Lexicography, 3.
46. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402-407. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195588.
47. Olney, A. M. (2011). Large-scale latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 414-423. doi: 10. 3758/s13428-010-0050-z.
48. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1998). Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 401-418. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1997. 2557.
49. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., & Michelizzi, J. (2004). WordNet:: similarity-Measuring the relatedness of concepts. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 144-152). Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press.
50. Pennebaker, J. W., & Chung, C. K. (2008). Computerized text analysis of Al-Qaeda transcripts. In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds.), A content analysis reader (pp. 453-465). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
51. Perfetti, C. A. (1998). The limits of co-occurrence: Tools and theories in language research. Discourse Processes, 25, 363-377.
52. Porter, M., & Boulton, R. (2006). Snowball stemmer [Computer software]. Authors.
53. Recchia, G., & Jones, M. N. (2009). More data trumps smarter algorithms: Comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 647-656. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 41. 3. 647.
54. Riordan, B., & Jones, M. N. (2007). Comparing semantic space models using child-directed speech. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 599-604). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
55. Riordan, B., & Jones, M. N. (2011). Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: Comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic representation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 303-345. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1756-8765. 2010. 01111. x.
56. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.
57. Sahlgren, M. (2005, August). An introduction to random indexing. Paper presented at the Methods and Applications of Semantic Indexing Workshop at the 7th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, Copenhagen, Denmark.
58. Sahlgren, M., Holst, A., & Kanerva, P. (2008). Permutations as a means to encode order in word space. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1300-1305). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
59. Spence, B. (2000). Information visualization. New York: Addison-Wesley.
60. Sporns, O. (2011). The human connectome: A complex network. In The year in cognitive neuroscience (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1224, pp. 109-125). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
61. Sporns, O., Chialvo, D. R., Kaiser, M., & Hilgetag, C. C. (2004). Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 418-425. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2004. 07. 008.
62. Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41-78. doi: 10. 1207/s15516709cog2901_3.
63. Steyvers, M., Smyth, P., & Chemuduganta, C. (2011). Combining background knowledge and learned topics. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 18-47. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1756-8765. 2010. 01097. x.
64. Stone, B., Dennis, S., & Kwantes, P. J. (2011). Comparing methods for single paragraph similarity analysis. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 92-122. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1756-8765. 2010. 01108. x.
65. Thomas, J. J., & Cook, K. A. (2005). Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics. Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
66. Turney, P. D., & Pantel, P. (2010). From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37, 141-188.
67. Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 183-190. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 40. 1. 183.
68. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Widdows, D. (2004). Geometry and meaning. Stanford: Stanford University, CSLI Publications.
70. Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nature Methods, 8, 665-670. doi: 10. 1038/nmeth. 1635.