Comparing methods for single paragraph similarity analysis

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 92-122

  Stone, Benjamin ^a   Dennis, Simon ^b   Kwantes, Peter J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Corpus construction; Corpus preprocessing; Paragraph similarity; Semantic models; Wikipedia corpora

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LANGUAGE; SEMANTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DATASETS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; KNOWLEDGE BASES; LANGUAGE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SEMANTICS;

EID: 79961230037     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01108.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bell, N., & Garland, M. (2008). Efficient sparse matrix-vector multiplication on CUDA (NVIDIA Technical Report No. NVR-2008-004). NVIDIA Corporation. Available at:. Accessed on April 10, 2009.
2. Berry, M. W., & Browne, M. (2005). Email surveillance using non-negative matrix factorization. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 11(3), 249-264.
3. Blei, D., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4-5), 993-1022.
4. Bullinaria, J. A., & Levy, J. P. (2006). Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 39(3), 510-526.
5. Choueka, Y., & Lusignan, S. (1985). Disambiguation by short contexts. Computers and the Humanities, 19(3), 147-157.
6. Foltz, P. W. (2007). Discourse coherence and LSA. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 167-184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Foltz, P. W., Laham, D., & Landauer, T. K. (1999). The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 1(2). Available at:. Accessed on April 2, 2008.
8. Gabrilovich, E., & Markovitch, S. (2007). Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis. In M. M. Veloso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 1606-1611). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
9. Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438(7070), 900-901.
10. Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2002). A probabilistic approach to semantic representation. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Cognitive Society (pp. 381-386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(Suppl. 1), 5228-5235.
12. Griffiths, T. L., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Steyvers, M. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114(2), 211-244.
13. Kireyev, K. (2008). Beyond words: Semantic representation of text in distributional models of language. In M. Baroni, S. Evert, & A. Lenci (Eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI workshop on distributional lexical semantics: Bridging the gap between semantic theory and computational simulations (pp. 25-33). Hamburg, Germany: ESSLLI.
14. Kwantes, P. J. (2005). Using context to build semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(4), 703-710.
15. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Platos problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211-240.
16. Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Lee, M. D., & Corlett, E. Y. (2003). Sequential sampling models of human text classification. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 159-193.
18. Lee, M. D., Pincombe, B. M., & Welsh, M. B. (2005). An empirical evaluation on models of text document similarity. In B. G. Bara, L. W. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the Cognitive Society (pp. 1254-1259). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Martin, D. I., & Berry, M. W. (2007). Mathematical foundations behind Latent Semantic Analysis. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 35-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Martin, M. J., & Foltz, P. W. (2004). Automated team discourse annotation and performance prediction using LSA. In S. T. Dumais, D. Marcu, & S. Roukos (Eds.), HLT-NAACL 2004: Short papers (pp. 97-100). Boston, MA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Masson, M. E. J. (1982). Cognitive processes in skimming stories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 400-417.
22. McNamara, D. S., Cai, Z., & Louwerse, M. M. (2007). Optimizing LSA measures of cohesion. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 379-400). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Secaucus, NJ: Springer-Verlag New York.
24. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at: Accessed February 2, 2009.
25. Pincombe, B. M. (2004). Comparison of human and LSA judgements of pairwise document similarities for a news corpus (Tech. Rep. No. DSTO-RR-0278). Adelaide, Australia: Australian Defense Science and Techology Organisation (DSTO), Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Division. Available at:. Accessed on April 15, 2008.
26. Salton, G., Wong, A., & Yang, C. S. (1975). A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613-620.
27. Sebastiani, F. (2002). Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1), 1-47.
28. Shashua, A., & Hazan, T. (2005). Non-negative tensor factorization with applications to statistics and computer vision. In L. De Raedt & S. Wrobel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on machine learning (pp. 792-799). New York: ACM Press.
29. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245-251.
30. Toffler, A. (1973). Future shock. London: Pan.
31. Xu, W., Liu, X., & Gong, Y. (2003). Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. In J. Callan, D. Hawking, A. Smeaton, & C. Clarke (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR '03) (pp. 267-273). New York: ACM Press.
32. Zelikovitz, S., & Kogan, M. (2006). Using web searches on important words to create background sets for LSI classification. In G. Sutcliffe & R. Goebel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international FLAIRS conference (pp. 598-603). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.