Field reliability of competence to stand trial opinions: How often do evaluators agree, and what do judges decide when evaluators disagree?

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 130-139

  Neil Gowensmith, W ^a   Murrie, Daniel C ^b   Boccaccini, Marcus T ^c  

^a Adult Mental Health Division   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HAWAII; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84865602118     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0093958     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bernstein, D. E. (2008). Expert witnesses, adversarial bias, and the (partial) failure of the Daubert revolution. Iowa Law Review, 92, 102-137.
2. Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D., & Murrie, D. C. (2008). Do some evaluators report consistently higher or lower psychopathy scores than others? Findings from a statewide sample of sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 262-283. doi:10.1037/a0014523
3. Bonnie, R., & Grisso, T. (2000). Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders. In T. Grisso & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial (pp. 73-103). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Brennan, R. L., & Prediger, D. J. (1981). Coefficient Kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 687-699. doi:10.1177/001316448104100307
5. Christy, A., Douglas, K., Otto, R. K., & Petrila, J. (2004). Juveniles evaluated incompetent to proceed: Characteristics and quality of mental health professionals' evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 380-388. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.35.4.380 (Pubitemid 39015892)
6. Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. A. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137. (Pubitemid 11006962)
7. Cruise, K. R., & Rogers, R. (1998). An analysis of competency to stand to stand trial: An integration of case law and clinical knowledge. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 35-50. (Pubitemid 28159653)
8. Fleiss, J. L. (1980). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
9. Golding, S. L. (1992). Studies of incompetent defendants: Research and social policy implications. Forensic Reports, 5, 77-83.
10. Golding, S. L. (2008). Evaluations of adult adjudicative competency. In R. Jackson (Ed.), Learning forensic assessment (pp. 75-108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Golding, S. L., Roesch, R., & Schreiber, J. (1984). Assessment and conceptualization of competency to stand trial: Preliminary data on the interdisciplinary fitness interview. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 321-334. doi:10.1007/BF01044699
12. Goldstein, R. L., & Stone, M. (1977). When doctors disagree: Differing views on competency. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 8, 90-97.
13. Gowensmith, W. N. (2010). Comparison of state forensic evaluation systems in the United States. unpublished data.
14. Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1992). Predicting fitness to stand trial: The relative power of demographic, criminal, and clinical variables. Forensic Reports, 5, 53-65.
15. Hawaii Revised Statutes, Vol. 14, 704-404 (2003). doi:10.1007/BF01044699
16. Hoge, S., Bonnie, R., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1992). Attorney-client decision making in criminal cases: Client competence and participation as perceived by their attorneys. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 385-406. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370100308
17. Homant, R. J., & Kennedy, D. B. (1987). Subjective factors in the judgment of insanity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 38-61. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did-41435115&Fmt-1& clientId- 82498&RQT-309&VName-PQD
18. Krafka, C., Meghan, A., Dunn, M. A., Johnson, M. T., Cecil, J. S., & Miletich, D. (2002). Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 309-332. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.8.3.309 (Pubitemid 44757812)
19. Laboratory of Community Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness (DHEW Publication No. ADM77-103). Rockville, MD: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
20. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
21. Morris, G. H., Haroun, A. M., & Naimark, D. (2004). Health law in the criminal justice system symposium: Competency to stand trial on trial. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy, 4, 193-238.
22. Mossman, D., Bowen, M. D., Vanness, D. J., Bienenfeld, D., Correll, T., Kay, J., . . .Lehrer, D. S. (2009). Quantifying the accuracy of forensic examiners in the absence of a "gold standard". Law and Human Behavior, 34(5), 402. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9197-5
23. Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D., Meeks, M., Woods, C., & Tussey, C. (2009). Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 15, 19-53. doi:10.1037/a0014897
24. Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M., Zapf, P. A., Warren, J. I., & Henderson, C. E. (2008). Clinician variation in findings of competence to stand trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 177-193. doi:10.1037/a0013578
25. Murrie, D. C., & Warren, J. I. (2005). Clinician variation in rates of legal sanity opinions: Implications for self-monitoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 519-524. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.36.5.519 (Pubitemid 41650680)
26. Perlin, M. L. (2004). Everything's a little upside down, as a matter of fact the wheels have stopped: The fraudulence of the incompetency evaluation process. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy, 4, 239-253.
27. Pirelli, G., Gottdiener, W. H., & Zapf, P. A. (in press). A meta-analytic review of competency to stand trial research. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.
28. Poythress, N. G., & Stock, H. V. (1980). Competency to stand trial: A historical review and some new data. Psychiatry and Law, 8, 131-146. (Pubitemid 11171548)
29. Randolph, J. J. (2008). Online kappa calculator [online application]. Retrieved March 2, 2010, from http://justus.randolph.name/kappa.
30. Robinson, R., & Acklin, M. W. (2010). Fitness in paradise: Quality of forensic reports submitted to the Hawaii judiciary. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 131-137. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.03.001
31. Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1980). Competency to stand trial. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
32. Roesch, R., Zapf, P. A., & Eaves, D. (2006). Fitness interview test-revised: A structured interview for assessing competency to stand trial. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
33. Rogers, R., & Johannsson-Love, J. (2009). Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice. Journal of the Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37, 450-460.
34. Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E., & Sewell, K. W. (2004). Evaluation of competency to stand trial-revised professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
35. Shuman, D., Whitaker, E., & Champagne, A. (1994). An empirical examination of the use of expert witnesses in the courts-Part II: A three part study. Jurimetrics, 34, 193-208. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb? did-41486506&Fmt-1&clientId-82498&RQT-309&VName-PQD
36. Skeem, J., & Golding, S. (1998). Community examiners' evaluations of competence to stand trial: Common problems and suggestions for improvement. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 357-367.
37. Skeem, J., Golding, S., Cohn, N., & Berge, G. (1998). The logic and reliability of expert opinion on competence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 519-547. doi:10.1023/A:1025787429972 (Pubitemid 28525459)
38. Zapf, P. A., Hubbard, K. L., Galloway, V. A., Cox, M., & Ronan, K. A. (2004). Have the courts abdicated their responsibility for determinations of competency to stand trial to clinicians? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4, 27-44. doi:10.1300/J158v04n01-02 (Pubitemid 38854650)
39. Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2006). Competency to stand trial: A guide for evaluators. In A. K. Hess & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (3rd ed., pp. 305-331). New York: Wiley.
40. Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2009). Evaluation of competence to stand trial. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.