RATER (DIS)AGREEMENT ON RISK ASSESSMENT MEASURES IN SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR PROCEEDINGS: Evidence of Adversarial Allegiance in Forensic Evaluation?

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 19-53

  Murrie, Daniel C ^a   Boccaccini, Marcus T ^b   Turner, Darrel B ^b   Meeks, Meredith ^b   Woods, Carol ^b   Tussey, Chriscelyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

allegiance; bias; psychopathy; sex offender civil commitment; sexually violent predator

Indexed keywords

EID: 62349106579     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014897     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Amenta, A. (2005). The assessment of sexual offenders for civil commitment proceedings: An analysis of report content. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University.
2. American Bar Association. ABA criminal justice mental health standards (1989), Author, Washington, DC
3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text revision (2000), Author, Washington, DC
4. Applebaum, P. S. (1998, March). The medicalization of "judicial decision making." Lecture presented at the Judicial Training Conference on Mental Health Testimony in the Courtroom sponsored by Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee and Flaschner Judicial Institute. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://www.mass.gov/mhlac/applebaum.htm
5. Association for the Treatment of Sex Abusers. Civil commitment of sexually violent predators (2001). http://www.atsa.com/ppcivilcommit.html Position paper retrieved from http://www.atsa.com/ppcivilcommit.html
6. Barbaree H.E., Seto M.C., Langton C.M., and Peacock E.J. Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 28 (2001) 490-521
7. Bartosh D.L., Garby T., Lewis D., and Gray S. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47 (2003) 422-438
8. Blair P., Marcus D., and Boccaccini M.T. Is there an allegiance effect for assessment instruments? Actuarial risk assessment as an exemplar. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 15 (2008) 346-360
9. Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., & Caperton, J. (2008, March 5-8). Predicting recidivism with the MnSOST-R, PAI, PCL-R, and STATIC-99 in a statewide sex offender sample. Paper presented at the 2008 conference of the American Psychology-Law Association, Jacksonville, FL.
10. Boccaccini M.T., Turner D.T., and Murrie D.C. Do some evaluators report consistently higher or lower scores on the PCL-R?: Findings from a statewide sample of sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 14 (2008) 262-283
11. Borum R., Otto R., and Golding S. Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation. Journal of Psychiatry & Law 21 (1993) 35-76
12. Brennan R.L. Generalizability theory (2001), Springer, New York
13. Brodsky S.L. Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness (1991), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
14. Campbell T. The validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in adversarial proceedings. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 6 (2006) 43-53
15. Campbell T.W. Assessing sex offenders: Problems and pitfalls. 2nd ed. (2007), Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL
16. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior 15 (1991) 655-665
17. Commons M.L., Miller P.M., and Gutheil T.G. Expert witness perceptions of bias in experts. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 32 (2004) 70-75
18. DeMatteo D., and Edens J.F. The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12 (2006) 215-241
19. Doren D.M. Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitment and beyond (2002), Sage, London
20. Doren D.M. Stability of the interpretative risk percentages for the RRASOR and Static-99. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 16 (2004) 25-36
21. Doren D.M. Inaccurate arguments in sex offender civil commitment proceedings. In: Schlank A. (Ed). The sexual predator: Law and public policy-Clinical practice III (2006), Civic Research Institute, Kingston, NJ
22. Dunlap W.P., Cortina J.M., Vaslow J.B., and Burke M.J. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures. Psychological Methods 1 (1996) 170-177
23. Epperson D.L., Kaul J.D., Goldman R., Hout S., Hesselton D., and Alexander W. Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) (1998), Minnesota Department of Corrections, St. Paul. http://www.psychology.iastate.edu Available online at http://www.psychology.iastate.edu
24. Epperson D.L., Kaul J.D., Hout S., Goldman R., Hesselton D., and Alexander W. Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) technical paper: Development, validation, and recommended risk level cut scores (2003), Minnesota Department of Corrections, St. Paul. http://www.psychology.iastate.edu Available online at http://www.psychology.iastate.edu
25. Gacano C.B., and Hutton H.E. Suggestions for the clinical and forensic use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 17 (1994) 303-317
26. Grove W.M., and Meehl P.E. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2 (1996) 293-323
27. Grove W.M., Zald D.H., Lebow B.S., Snitz B.E., and Nelson C. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment 12 (2000) 19-30
28. Hanson, R. K. (2001). Note on the reliability of STATIC-99 as used by the California Department of Mental Health evaluators. Unpublished report. Sacramento: California Department of Mental Health.
29. Hanson R.K., Morton K.E., and Harris A.J.R. Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. In: Prentky R.A., Janus E.S., and Seto M.C. (Eds). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 989. Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (2003), New York Academy of Sciences, New York 154-166
30. Hanson R.K., and Morton-Bourgon K.E. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 73 (2005) 1154-1163
31. Hanson R.K., and Morton-Bourgon K.E. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis (2007), Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
32. Hanson R.K., and Thornton D. Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 99-02) (1999), Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
33. Hanson R.K., and Thornton D. Notes on the development of the Static-2002 (User Report 2003-10) (2003), Office of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
34. Hare R.D. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (1991), Multi-Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
35. Hare R.D. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. 2nd ed. (2003), Multi-Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
36. Harris A., Phenix A., Hanson R.K., and Thornton D. STATIC-99 coding rules revised-2003 (2003), Office of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. http://www.static99.org Retrieved from www.static99.org
37. Harris G.T., Rice M.E., Quinsey V.L., Lalumiere M.L., Boer D., and Lang C. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment 15 (2003) 413-425
38. Heilbrun K. The role of psychological testing in forensic assessment. Law and Human Behavior 16 (1992) 257-272
39. Heilbrun K., DeMatteo D., Marczyk G., and Goldstein A.M. Standards of practice and care in forensic mental health assessment: Legal, professional, and principles-based considerations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 14 (2008) 1-26
40. Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision. Sex offender assessment information survey 4-2007 (2007, April). http://www.interstatecompact.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=jLoQPVeviaQ%3 d&tabid=105&mid=431 Retrieved December 29, 2008, from http://www.interstatecompact.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=jLoQPVeviaQ%3 d&tabid=105&mid=431
41. Jackson R.L., and Hess D.T. Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 19 (2007) 425-448
42. Jackson R.L., and Richards H.J. Evaluations for the civil commitment of sexual offenders. In: Jackson R.L. (Ed). Learning forensic assessment (2008), Routledge, New York 183-209
43. Janus E.S., and Prentky R. Forensic use of actuarial risk assessment with sex offenders: Accuracy, admissibility, and accountability. American Criminal Law Review 40 (2003) 1443-1499
44. Kansas v. Hendricks, 117 S. Ct. 2072 (1997).
45. Knight R.A., and Guay J. The role of psychopathy in sexual coercion against women. In: Patrick C. (Ed). Handbook of psychopathy (2006), Guilford Press, New York 512-532
46. LaFond J.Q. Preventing sexual violence: How society should cope with sex offenders (2005), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
47. Langton C.M., Barbaree H.E., Seto M.S., Peacock E.J., Harkins L., and Hansen K.T. Actuarial assessment for reoffense among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the STATIC-2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34 (2007) 37-59
48. Leistico A.R., Salekin R.S., DeCoster J., and Rogers R. A large-scale meta-analysis relating Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior 32 (2008) 28-45
49. Levenson J.S. Sexual predator civil commitment: A comparison of selected and released offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48 (2004) 638-648
50. Levenson J.S. Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria in Florida. Law and Human Behavior 28 (2004) 357-368
51. McGrath R.J., Cumming G.F., and Bouchard B.L. Current practices and trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2002 Nationwide Survey (2003), Safer Society Press, Brandon, VT
52. McGraw K.O., and Wong S.P. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1 (1996) 30-46
53. Melton G.B., Petrila J., Poythress N.G., Slobogin C., and Otto R.K. Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. 3rd ed. (2007), Guilford Press, New York
54. Miller H.A., Amenta A.E., and Conroy M.A. Sexually violent predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behavior 29 (2005) 29-54
55. Mnoonkin J. Expert evidence, partisanship, and epistemic confidence. Brooklyn Law Review 73 (2008) 587-611
56. Monahan J. A jurisprudence of risk assessment forecasting harm among prisoners, predators, and patients. Virginia Law Review 92 (2006) 391-435
57. Murrie D.C., Boccaccini M., Johnson J., and Janke C. Does interrater (dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluation?. Law and Human Behavior 32 (2008) 352-362
58. Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., & Turner, D. T. (in press). Ethical challenges in sex-offender civil commitment evaluations: Applying imperfect science in adversarial proceedings. In A. Schlank (Ed.), The sexual predator (Vol. 4). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
59. Murrie D.C., Boccaccini M.T., Zapf P.A., Warren J.I., and Henderson C.E. Clinician variation in findings of trial competence. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 14 (2008) 179-193
60. Murrie D.C., and Warren J.I. Clinician variation in rates of legal sanity opinions: Implications for self-monitoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 36 (2005) 519-524
61. Norusis M. SPSS 12.0 statistical procedures companion (2003), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle, NJ
62. Quinsey V.L., Rice M.E., and Harris G.T. Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 10 (1995) 85-105
63. Rice M.E., Harris G.T., and Quinsey V.L. A follow-up of rapists assesses in a maximum-security psychiatric facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 5 (1990) 435-448
64. Rogers R. Ethical dilemmas in forensic evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 5 (1987) 149-160
65. Rosenthal R. How often are our numbers wrong?. American Psychologist 33 (1978) 1005-1008
66. Rutherford M., Cacciola J.S., Alterman A.I., McKay J.R., and Cook T.G. The 2-year test-retest reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in methadone patients. Assessment 6 (1999) 285-291
67. Seto M.C. Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment 17 (2005) 156-167
68. Shalverson R.J., and Webb N.M. Generalizability theory: A primer (1991), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
69. Shalverson R.J., Webb N.M., and Rowley G.L. Generalizability theory. American Psychologist 44 (1989) 922-932
70. Shuman D.W., and Greenberg S.A. The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacy. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice 34 (2003) 219-224
71. United States v. Alvarez, 519 F. 2d 1036 (3rd Cir. 1975).
72. Vrieze S.I., and Grove W.M. Predicting sex offender recidivism: I. Correcting for item overselection and accuracy overestimation in scale development. II. Sampling error-induced attenuation of predictive validity over base rate information. Law and Human Behavior 32 (2008) 266-278
73. Wollert R. The importance of cross-validation in actuarial test construction: Shrinkage in the risk estimates for the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised. Journal of Threat Assessment 2 (2002) 87-102
74. Wollert R. Additional flaws in the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised: A response to Doren and Dow (2002). Journal of Threat Assessment 2 (2003) 65-78
75. Wollert R. Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes's Theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12 (2006) 56-85
76. Wood J., Nezworski M., and Stejskal W. The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A critical examination. Psychological Science 7 (1996) 3-10