Evaluations of adult adjudicative competency

Learning Forensic Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 75-108

  Golding, Stephen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67049139968     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203939888     Document Type: Chapter

References (120)

1. Amador, X., Strauss, D., Yale, S. et al. (1993). Assessment of insight in psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 873-879.
2. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www2.apa.org/ethics/92-02codecompare.doc.
3. American Psychology Law Society. (2006). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology second official draft 1/11/2006. Accessed at http://www.ap-ls.org.
4. Appelbaum, P. (1994). Almost a revolution: Mental health law and the limits of change. New York: Oxford.
5. Arbisi, P. A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1998). The ability of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 validity scales to detect fake-bad responses in psychiatric inpatients. Psychological Assessment, 10, 221-228.
6. Atherton, J. (2005). State v. Mitchell. Findings and conclusions re: Defendant's competency to proceed to trial. http://www.utcourts.gov/media/news/archives/State%20v.%20Mitchell-Ruling%20on%20Competency%20to%20Proceed.pdf.
7. Bagby, R., Nicholson, R., Bacchioci, J. et al. (2002). The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 69-86.
8. Berry, D., Baer, R., Rinaldo, J., & Wetter, M. (2002). Assessment of malingering. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches (pp. 268-302). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Bertman, L. J., Thompson, J. W. J., Waters, W. F., Estupinan-Kane, L., Martin, J. A., & Russell, L. (2003). Effect of an Individualized treatment protocol on restoration of competency in pretrial forensic inpatients. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 27-35.
10. Bonnie, R. J. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 291-316.
11. Brooks v. McCaughtry, 380 F. 3D 1009 (7th Cir. Wis. 2004).
12. Burrows, M., & Herbert, P. (2005). Competence to stand trial: Competence to stand trial does not conclusively equate to competence to waive trial counsel. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33, 557-558.
13. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655-665.
14. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
15. Davis, J., Chen, N., & Glick, I. (2003). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 553-564.
16. Day, J., Bentall, R., Roberts, C. et al. (2005). Attitudes toward antipsychotic medication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 717-724.
17. Declue, G. (2003). Toward a two-stage model for assessing adjudicative competence. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 31, 305-317.
18. Drope v. Missouri. 420 U. S. 162 (1975).
19. Dusky v. United States. 362 U.S. 402 (1960).
20. Edens, J., Cruise, K., & Buffington-Vollum, J. (2001). Forensic and correctional applications of the Personality Assessment Inventory. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 519-543.
21. Eisenberg, T., Garvey, S., & Wells, M. (1998). But was he sorry? The role of remorse in capital sentencing. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1599-1637.
22. Estelle v. Smith. 451 U.S. 454 (1981).
23. Everington, C., & Dunn, C. (1995). A second validation study of the Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST-MR). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 44-59.
24. Farkas, M., Rosenfeld, B., Robbins, R., & van Gorp, W. (2006). Do Tests of malingering concur? Concordance among malingering measures. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 24, 659-671.
25. First, M. (Ed.). (2003). Standardized evaluation in clinical practice. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.
26. Frith's Case. 22 Howes' State Trials 307, 318 (1790).
27. Gaudiano, B., & Miller, I. (2006). Patient's expectancies, the alliance in pharmacotherapy, and treatment outcomes in bipolar disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 671-676.
28. Geddes, J., Burgess, S., Hawton, K., Jamison, K., & Goodwin, G. (2004). Long-term lithium therapy for bipolar disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 217-222.
29. Geddes, J., Freemantle, N., Harrison, P., & Bebbington, P. (2000). Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: A systematic overview and meta-regression analysis. British Medical Journal, 321, 1371-1376.
30. Godinez v. Moran. 509 U.S. 389 (1993).
31. Golding, S. L. (1993). Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview-Revised: A training manual. Unpublished monograph from State of Utah Division of Mental Health. Available at http://home.comcast.net/~slgolding.
32. Golding, S. L. (1992). Studies of incompetent defendants: Research and social policy implications. Forensic Reports, 5, 77-83.
33. Golding, S. L., & Roesch, R. (1988). Competency for adjudication: An international analysis. In D. Weisstub (Ed.), Law and mental health: International perspectives (Vol. 4, pp. 73-109). New York: Pergamon Press.
34. Golding, S. L., Roesch, R., & Schreiber, J. (1984). Assessment and conceptualization of competency to stand trial: Preliminary data on the Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 8(3-4), 321-334.
35. Golding, S. L., Skeem, J. L., Roesch, R., & Zapf, P. A. (1999). The assessment of criminal responsibility: Current controversies. In A. K. Hess & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology (2nd ed., pp. 327-249). New York: Wiley.
36. Greenberg, S. A., & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(1), 50-57.
37. Greer, A., O' Regan, M., & Traverso, A. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence and patients' perceptions of procedural due process of civil commitment hearings. In D. Wexler & B. Winick (Eds.), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 923-933). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
38. Grisso, T. (1988). Competency to stand trial evaluations. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.
39. Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
40. Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer.
41. Grisso, T. (2005). Evaluating juveniles' adjudicative competence. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
42. Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998a). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. London, Oxford University Press.
43. Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998b). MacArthur competence assessment tool for treatment (MacCAT-T). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
44. Grisso, T., Appelbaum, P., Mulvey, E., & Fletcher, K. (1995). The MacArthur treatment competence study II: Measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 127-148.
45. Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of Forensic Mental Health Assessment. New York: Kluwer.
46. Heilbrun, K., & Kramer, G. (2005). Involuntary medication, trial competence, and clinical dilemmas: Implications of Sell v. United States for psychological practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(5), 459-466.
47. Heres, S., Davis, J., Maino, K., Jetzinger, E. et al. (2006). Why olanzapine beats risperidone, risperidone beats quetiapine, and quetiapine beats olanzapine: An exploratory analysis of head-to-head comparison studies of second-generation antipsychotics. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 185-194.
48. Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1999). The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
49. Hurley, K., & Deal, W. (2006). Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: Potential problems and issues. Mental Retardation, 44(2), 112-119.
50. Jackson v. Indiana. 402 U.S. 715 (1972).
51. Jørgensen, A., Hilden, J., & Gøtzsche, P. (2006). Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, doi:10.1136/bmj.38973.444699.0B. [Retrieved October 16, 2006 ].
52. Krupnick, J. L., Sotsky, S., Simmens, S. et al. (1996). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the NIMH treatment of depression collaborative research program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 532-539.
53. Ladds, B., & Convit, A. (1994). Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: A review of empirical studies. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22, 519-532.
54. Lally, S. J. (2003). What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations?: A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 491-498.
55. Lawrence v. Georgia. 454 S.E.2d 446 (Ga. 1995).
56. Lidz, C., Hoge, S., Gardner, W., Bennett, N., Monahan, J., Mulvey, E. et al. (1995). Perceived coercion in mental hospital admission: Pressure and process. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1034-1039.
57. Lieberman, J., Stroup, T., McEvoy, J. et al. (2005). Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 1209-1223.
58. Litwack, T. R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 409-443.
59. Litwack, T. (2003). The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 135-156.
60. Maxwell v. Roe. 113 Fed. Appx. 213 (9th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 2513 (2005).
61. McEvoy, J., Lieberman, J., Stroup, T. et al. (2006). Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and resperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 600-610.
62. McEvoy, J. P., Apperson, L. J., Appelbaum, P. S. et al. (1989) Insight in schizophrenia: Its relationship to acute psychopathology. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 43-47.
63. MCGarry, A., Lelos, D., & Lipsitt, P. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness (DHEW publication number HSM-73-9105). Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health.
64. Melton ,G., Petrila ,J., Poythress ,N., & Slobogin ,C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.
65. Michael v. Horn. No. 04-9002 (3rd Cir. 2006).
66. Miles v. Stainer. 108 F. 3d 1109 (9th Cir. 1997).
67. Miller, H. (2001). Miller-Forensic assessment of symptoms test. Odessa, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
68. Miller, H. (2004). Examining the use of the M-FAST with criminal defendants incompetent to stand trial. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 268-280.
69. Møller, P., & Husby, R. (2000). The initial prodrome in schizophrenia: Searching for naturalistic core dimensions of experience and behavior. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26, 217-232.
70. Morris, G., & Meloy, J. (1993). Out of mind? Out of sight: The uncivil commitment of permanently incompetent criminal defendants. UC Davis Law Review, 27, 1-96.
71. Pate v. Robinson. 383 U.S. 375 (1966).
72. People v. Goldstein, 843 N.E. 2d 727 (Court of Appeals, New York 2005).
73. Pierre, J. (2001). Faith or delusion? At the crossroads of religion and psychosis. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 7, 163-172.
74. Pinals, D. (2005). Where two roads met: Restoration of competence to stand trial from a clinical perspective. New England Journal of Civil and Criminal Confinement, 31, 81-108.
75. Pollock, P. (1996). A cautionary note on the determination of malingering in offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3, 97-110.
76. Poythress, N., Bonnie, R., Monahan, J., Otto, R., & Hoge, S. (2002). Adjudicative competence: The MacArthur studies. New York: Kluwer Academic.
77. Poythress, N., Nicholson, R., Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., & Hoge, S. K. (1999). The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
78. Riggins v. Nevada, 505 U.S. 437 (1992).
79. Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1979). Treatment and disposition of defendants found incompetent to stand trial: A review and a proposal. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2, 349-370.
80. Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1980). Competency to stand trial. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
81. Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1987) Defining and assessing competency to stand trial. In I. B. Weiner & A. K. Hess (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology. Wiley Series on personality process (pp. 378-394). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
82. Roesch, R., Ogloff, J., & Golding, S. L. (1993). Competency to stand trial: Legal and clinical issues. Journal of Applied and Preventative Psychology, 2, 43-51.
83. Roesch, R., Zapf, P. A., Golding, S. L., & Skeem, J. (1999). Defining and assessing competency to stand trial. In I. B. Weiner & A. K. Hess (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology, (2nd ed., pp. 327-349). New York: Wiley.
84. Roesch, R., Zapf, P.A., & Eaves, D. (2006). The Fitness Interview Test-Revised: A structured interview for assessing competency to stand trial. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
85. Resnick, P. (1997). Malingered psychosis. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 47-67). New York: Guilford.
86. Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed). New York: Guilford.
87. Rogers, R. (2001). Handbook of diagnostic and structured interviewing. New York: Guilford.
88. Rogers, R. (2003). Forensic use and abuse of psychological tests: Multiscale inventories. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 9, 316-320.
89. Rogers, R., Bagby, R., & Dickens, S. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and professional manual. Odessa, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
90. Rogers, R., Jackson, R., Sewell, K., & Harrison, K. (2004). An examination of the ECST-R as a screen for feigned incompetency to stand trial. Psychological Assessment, 16, 139-145.
91. Rogers, R., Jackson, R., Sewell, K., Tillbrook, C., & Martin, M. (2003). Assessing dimensions of competency to stand trial: Construct validation of the ECST-R. Assessment, 101, 344-351.
92. Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C., & Sewell, K. (2004). Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial-Revised (ECST-R): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
93. Scott, C. L. (2003). Commentary: A road map for research in restoration of competency to stand trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 36-43.
94. Sell v. United States. 539 U.S. 166 (2003).
95. Shuman, D. W. (2005). Psychiatric and psychological evidence (3rd ed.). Colorado Springs, Colorado: Shepards/McGraw-Hill.
96. Siegel, A. M., & Elwork, A. (1990). Treating incompetence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 57-65.
97. Skeem, J., Golding, S.L., & Emke-Francis, P. (2004). Assessing adjudicative competency:Using legal and empirical principles to inform practice. In W. T. Donohue & E. R. Levensky (Eds.). Forensic psychology: A handbook for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 175-211). New York: Academic Press.
98. Skeem, J. L., Golding, S. L., Cohn, N. B., & Berge, G. (1998). Logic and reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 519-547.
99. Skeem, J., & Golding, S. L. (1998). Community examiners' evaluations of competence to stand trial: Common problems and suggestions for improvement. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 357-367.
100. Stafford, K. (2003). Assessment of competence to stand trial. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (Vol.11, pp. 359-380). New York: Wiley.
101. Stanton, B., & David, A. (2003). First person accounts of delusions. Psychiatric Bulletin, 24, 333-336.
102. Stiles, P., Poythress, N., Hall, A., Falkenbach, D., & Williams, R. (2001). Improving understanding of research consent disclosures among persons with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52, 780-785.
103. Stroup, T., Lieberman, J., McEvoy, J., Swartz, M. et al. (2006). Effectiveness of Olanzapine, Quetiapine, Risperidone, and Ziprasidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia following discontinuation of a previous atypical antipsychotic. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 611-622.
104. Sullivan, H.S. (1953). The psychiatric interview. New York: Norton.
105. Tandon, R. (2006). Comparing antipsychotic efficacy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1645.
106. Tombaugh, T. N. (1997). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment, 9, 260-268.
107. United States v. Bradshaw. 690 F. 2d 704, 712 [9th Cir. 1982].
108. United States v. Evans. 427 F. Supp. 2d 696 (W.D. Vir. 2006).
109. United States v. Gomes. 387 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2004).
110. United States v. Lindauer. 2006 U.S. Lexis 62872 (So. Dist. NY, 9/6/2006).
111. Viljoen, J., & Roesch, R. (2003). Diagnosis, current symptomatology and ability to stand trial. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3, 23-37.
112. Washington v. Harper. 494 U.S. 210 (1990).
113. Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. American Psychologist, 59(7), 595-613.
114. Whitaker, R. (2002). Mad in America: Bad science, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the mentally ill. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
115. Wilson v. United States. 391 F. 2d. 460 (1968).
116. Youtsey v. United States. 97 F. 937 (6th Cir. 1899).
117. Zapf, P., & Galloway, M. (2002). Test review: Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). American Psychology-Law Society Newsletter, 2002, 16-17;23.
118. Zapf, P., & Roesch, R. (2002). A comparison of the MacCAT-CA and the FIT for making determinations of competency to stand trial. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24, 81-92.
119. Zapf, P. A., Skeem, J., & Golding, S. L. (2005). Factor structure and validity of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Adjudication. Psychological Assessment, 17, 433-445.
120. Zapf, P. A., & Viljoen, J. L. (2003). Issues and considerations regarding the use of assessment instruments in the evaluation of competency to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 351-367. John Wiley & Sons.