Groundwater Remediation: The Next 30 Years

Ground Water

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 669-678

  Hadley, Paul W ^a   Newell, Charles J ^a  

^a GSI Environmental Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER; DRINKING WATER STANDARDS; GROUND WATER REMEDIATION; KEY CONSTRAINTS; MASS-DISCHARGE; MATRIX DIFFUSION; MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; PERFORMANCE DATA; PERFORMANCE STUDY;

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; WATER SUPPLY;

REMEDIATION;

DRINKING WATER; GROUND WATER;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DIFFUSION; DISCHARGE; DRINKING WATER; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; HYDROGEOLOGY; REMEDIATION; RESEARCH WORK; STANDARD (REGULATION); TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; WATER QUALITY;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANT;

DRINKING WATER; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; GROUNDWATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84865548671     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00942.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barbour, I. G. 1997. Religion and Science: Historical and Contemporary Issues. New York, New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
2. Brooks, M. C., A. L. Wood, M. D. Annable, K. Hatfield, J. Cho, C. Holbert, P. S. C. Rao, C. G. Enfield, K. Lynch, and R. E. Smith 2008. Changes in contaminant mass discharge from DNAPL source mass depletion: Evaluation at two field sites. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 102: 140-153.
3. Chapman, S. W., and B. L. Parker 2005. Plume persistence due to aquitard back diffusion following dense nonaqueous phase liquid source removal or isolation. Water Resources Research 41: W12411. DOI:10.1029/2005WR004224.
4. Doner, L., and T. Sale 2008. Back Diff Video Movie, Colorado State University Center for Contaminant Hydrology. www.gsi-net.com.
5. Doran, G. T. 1981. There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Management Review 70, no. 11 (AMA FORUM): 35-36.
6. Einarson, M. D., and D. M. Mackay 2001. Ground water contamination. Environmental Science & Technology 35, no. 3: 67A-73A.
7. Farhat, S. K., C. J. Newell, and E. Nichols 2006. Mass Flux Toolkit-To Evaluate Groundwater Impacts, Attenuation, and Remediation Alternatives, User's Manual, March 2006. www.gsi-net.com.
8. Farkas, A. L., and C. S. Frangione 2010. Growth for design and construction markets stops in 2009. Environmental Engineer 21: 24.
9. Freeze, R. A., and J. Cherry 1989. What has gone wrong? Ground Water 27, no. 4: 458-565.
10. Huling, S. G., and J. W. Weaver 1991. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids. USEPA Groundwater Issue Paper, EPA/540/4-91-002, 21 pp. http://www.epa.gov/ada/download/issue/issue8.pdf.
11. ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2011. Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy. IDSS-1. Washington, DC: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy Team. www.itrcweb.org.
12. ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2010. Use and Measurement of Mass Flux and Mass Discharge. MASSFLUX-1. Washington, DC: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy Team. www.itrcweb.org.
13. Kavanaugh, M. C., P. S. C. Rao, L. Abriola, J. Cherry, G. Destouni, R. Falta, D. Major, J. Mercer, C. Newell, T. Sale, S. Shoemaker, R. Siegrist, G. Teutsch, and K. Udell 2003. The DNAPL Remediation Challenge: Is There a Case for Source Depletion? EPA/600/R-03/143.
14. Kingston, J. L., P. R. Dahlen, and P. C. Johnson 2010. State-of-the-practice review of in situ thermal technologies. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation 30: 64-72. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2010.01305.x.
15. Krembs, F. J., R. L. Siegrist, M. Crimi, R. F. Furrer, and B. G. Petri 2010. ISCO for groundwater remediation: Analysis of field applications and performance. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 30, no. 4: 42-53.
16. Leu, D. J., and P. W. Hadley 1987. The California site mitigation decision tree process-An approach to solving the 'How Clean Should Clean Be' dilemma. In Hazardous Waste Site Management: Water Quality Issues, Report on a Colloquium Sponsored by the Water Science and Technology Board, National Research Council, 67-97. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Mackay, D. M., and J. A. Cherry 1989. Ground water contamination: Pump-and-Treat remediation. Environmental Science and Technology 23, no. 6: 620-636.
18. Mackay, D. M., P. V. Roberts, and J. A. Cherry 1985. Transport of organic contaminants in groundwater. Environmental Science and Technology 19, no. 5: 384-392.
19. McCarty, P. L., M. Reinhard, and B. E. Rittman 1981. Trace organics in groundwater. Environmental Science and Technology 15, no. 1: 40-51.
20. McGuire, T. M., J. M. McDade, and C. J. Newell 2006. Performance of DNAPL source depletion technologies at 59 chlorinated solvent-impacted sites. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 26, no. 1: 73-84.
21. Merriam-Webster Inc. 2012. Paradigm. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/paradigm (accessed March 2012).
22. National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Alternatives for Ground Water Cleanup. National Academies Press. SBN-10:0-309-04994-6. www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=2311toc.
23. NAVFAC. 2007. DNAPL Management Overview, Naval Facilities Engineering Services Center, Port Hueneme, CA. Downloaded from Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA 542-R-99-006.
24. Newell, C. J., S. K. Farhat, D. T. Adamson and B. B. Looney 2011. Contaminant plume classification system based on mass discharge. Ground Water 49: 914-919. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00793.x.
25. Oxford University Press. 2012. Paradigm. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/paradigm?q=paradigm(accessed March 2012).
26. Sale, T., and C. J. Newell 2011. A Guide for Selecting Remedies for Subsurface Releases of Chlorinated Solvent Sites. ESTCP Project ER-05 30. Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, Washington, DC.
27. Sale, T., C. Newell, H. Stroo, R. Hinchee, and P. Johnson 2008. Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Management of Chlorinated Solvents in Soils and Groundwater. Environmental Security Technology Certification Program.
28. Sustainable Remediation Forum (SURF). 2009. Integrating sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects. Remediation Journal 19, no. 3: 5-114 (Editors P. Hadley and D. Ellis ).
29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009. Amendment #2 to the Record of decision for the commencement bay-South Tacoma Channel Superfund Site, Operable Unit 1 Well 12a, Tacoma, Washington. (http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/a2010100003181.pdf.).
30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). March 2005. A Decision-Making Framework for Cleanup of Sites Impacted with Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPL). EPA 542-R-04-011.
31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. 25 Years of the Safe Drinking Water Act: History and Trends. December, 1999. EPA 816-R-99-007.
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1998. Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Ground Water. EPA/600/R-98/128.
33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992a. Evaluation of Ground Water Extraction Remedies: Phase II, EPA Publication 9355.4-05, February 1992.
34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992b. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids-A Workshop Summary, Dallas, Texas, April 17-18, 1991. EPA 600/R-92/030. Ada, Oklahoma: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Robert S. Kerr Laboratory.
35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992c. Estimating potential for occurrence of DNAPL at superfund sites. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, R.S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, January 1992.
36. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991. Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C. OSWER 9355.0-30.
37. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies: Volume 1, Summary Report (EPA/ 540/2-89/054, NTIS PB90-183583, 66 pp.); Volume 2, Case Studies 1-19 (EPA/540/2-89/ 054b); and Volume 3, General Site Data Base Reports (EPA/540/2-89/054c). Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.
38. Wiedemeier, T. H., H. S. Rifai, C. J. Newell, and J. W. Wilson 1999. Natural Attenuation of Fuels and Chlorinated Solvents. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Wikipedia. 2011a. Order of Magnitude http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_magnitude (accessed July 2011).
40. Wikipedia. 2011b. SMART Criteria http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMART_criteria (accessed June 2011).