ISCO for groundwater remediation: Analysis of field applications and performance

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 42-53

  Krembs, Friedrich J ^a   Siegrist, Robert L ^b   Crimi, Michelle L ^c   Furrer, Reinhard F ^d   Petri, Benjamin G ^b  

^a Aquifer Solutions Inc   (United States)

^b Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

^c CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLORINATED SOLVENT; CLEANUP LEVELS; CRITICAL ANALYSIS; DELIVERY METHODS; DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS; DIRECT-PUSH; FIELD APPLICATION; GEOLOGIC MEDIA; GROUND WATER REMEDIATION; HOMOGENEOUS MEDIA; IN-SITU; INJECTION WELLS; MASS REDUCTION; MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS; METAL CONCENTRATIONS; MICROBIAL POPULATIONS; OPERATING PARAMETERS; PILOT TESTING; PROJECT INFORMATIONS; SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS;

GROUNDWATER; IMPURITIES; POPULATION STATISTICS; REMEDIATION; WELLS;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

CHLORINATION; CLEANUP; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASE; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MICROORGANISM; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; OXIDATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROJECT DESIGN;

EID: 78349274024     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: 17456592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2010.01312.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bass, D.H., N.A. Hastings, and R.A. Brown 2000. Performance of air sparging systems: A review of case studies. Journal of Hazardous Materials 72, 101-119.
2. Basu, N., A.D. Fure, and J.W. Jawitz 2008. Simplified contaminant source depletion models as analogs of multiphase simulators. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 97, 87-99.
3. Brusseau, M.L., E.L. DiFilippo, J.C. Marble, and M. Oostrom 2008. Mass-removal and mass-flux-reduction behavior for idealized source zones with hydraulically poorly-accessible immiscible liquid. Chemosphere 71, no. 8: 1511-1521.
4. Chapelle, F.H., and P.M. Bradley 1998. Selecting remediation goals by assessing the natural attenuation capacity of groundwater systems. Bioremediation Journal 2, no. 3-4: 227-238.
5. Chapelle, F.H., P.M. Bradley, and C.C. Casey 2005. Behavior of a chlorinated ethene plume following source-area treatment with Fenton's reagent. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 25, no. 2: 131-141.
6. Dolfing, J., M. Van Eekert, A. Seech, J. Vogan, and J. Mueller 2008. In situ chemical reduction (ISCR) technologies: Significance of low Eh reactions. Soil & Sediment Contamination 17, 63-74.
7. ESTCP. 1999. Technology status review: in situ oxidation. November.
8. ESTCP. 2009. In situ chemical oxidation for groundwater remediation: Site specific engineering and technology application.
9. Falta, R.W., P.S. Rao, and N. Basu 2005. Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: I. Analytical modeling of source strength functions and plume response. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 78, 259-280.
10. Fetter, C.W. 2001. Applied Hydrogeology, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
11. Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry 1979. Groundwater. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
12. GeoSyntec Consultants Inc. 2004. Assessing the feasibility of DNAPL source zone remediation: Review of case studies. Contract Report CR-04-002-ENV for NAVFAC.
13. Hemond, H.F., and E.J. Fechner-Levy 2000. Chemical Fate and Transport in the Environment, 2nd ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
14. Huling, S.G., and B.E. Pivetz 2006. Engineering issue: In-situ chemical oxidation. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 600-R-06-702.
15. ITRC. 2009. Evaluating natural source zone depletion at sites with LNAPL. (accessed May 19, 2009).
16. ITRC. 2007. In situ bioremediation of chlorinated ethene DNAPL source zones: Case studies. (accessed September 22, 2010).
17. ITRC. 2005. Technical and regulatory guidance for in situ chemical oxidation of contaminated soil and groundwater, 2nd ed. (accessed January 2, 2007).
18. ITRC. 2004. Strategies for monitoring the performance of DNAPL source zone remedies. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. (accessed January 2, 2007).
19. ITRC. 2001. Technical and regulatory guidance for in situ chemical oxidation of contaminated soil and groundwater. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. (accessed January 2, 2007).
20. Johnson, P.C., P. Dahlen, J. Triplett Kingston, E. Foote, and S. Williams 2009. Critical evaluation of state-of-the-art in situ thermal treatment technologies for DNAPL source zone treatment (ER-0314). (accessed September 21, 2010).
21. Kavanaugh, M.C., S.C. Rao, L. Abriola, J. Cherry, G. Destouni, R. Falta, D. Major, J. Mercer, C. Newell, T. Sale, S. Shoemaker, R. Siegrist, G. Teutsch, K. Udell 2003. The DNAPL remediation challenge: Is there a case for source depletion? U.S. EPA/600/R-03/143. Ada, Oklahoma: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA.
22. Krembs, F.J. 2008. Critical analysis of the field scale application of in situ chemical oxidation for the remediation of contaminated groundwater. M.S. thesis, Environmental Science and Engineering Division, Colorado School of Mines.
23. Lamarche, C., N.R. Thomson, and S. Forsey 2002. ISCO of a creosote source zone by permanganate. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
24. Lunneborg, C.E. 2000. Data Analysis by Resampling: Concepts and Applications. Pacific Grove, California: Duxbury Press.
25. Mackay, D.M., and J.A. Cherry 1989. Groundwater remediation: Pump-and-treat remediation. Environmental Science & Technology 23, no. 6: 630-636.
26. McDade, J.M., T.M. McGuire, and C.J. Newell 2005. Analysis of DNAPL source-depletion costs at 36 field sites. Remediation 15, no. 2: 9-18.
27. McGuire, T. M., J. M. McDade, and C.J. Newell 2006. Performance of DNAPL source depletion technologies at 59 chlorinated -solvent-impacted sites. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation 26, no. 1: 73-84.
28. NRC. 2004. Contaminants in the Subsurface: Source Zone Assessment and Remediation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
29. Pankow, J.F., and J.A. Cherry 1996. Dense Chlorinated Solvents and Other DNAPLs in Groundwater: History, Behavior, and Remediation. Portland, Oregon: Waterloo Press.
30. Petri, B., R.L. Siegrist, and M.L. Crimi 2008. State of science for ISCO and implications for field applications of ISCO. In 6th Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, California.
31. Sahl, J., and J. Munakata-Marr 2006. The effects of in situ chemical oxidation on microbial processes: a review. Remediation 16, no. 3: 57-70.
32. Siegrist, R.L., B. Petri, F. Krembs, M.L. Crimi, S. Ko, T. Simpkin, and T. Palaia 2008. In situ chemical oxidation for remediation of contaminated ground water. Summary Proceedings of an ISCO Technology Practices Workshop convened at the Colorado School of Mines, March 7-8, 2007, Golden, Colorado. ESTCP Project No. ER-0623. p. 77
33. Stroo, H.F., M. Unger, C.H. Ward, M.C. Kavanaugh, C. Vogel, A. Leeson, J.A. Marqusee, and B.P. Smith 2003. Remediating chlorinated solvent source zones. Environmental Science & Technology 37: 224A-231A.
34. Triplett Kingston, J. 2008. A critical evaluation of in-situ thermal technologies. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Arizona State University.
35. USEPA. 2004a. Cleaning up the nation's waste sites: Markets and technology trends (2004 edition). Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 542-R-04-015.
36. USEPA. 2004b. DNAPL remediation: Selected projects approaching regulatory closure. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 542-R-04-016.
37. USEPA. 1998. In situ remediation technology: In situ chemical oxidation. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 542-R-98-008.
38. USEPA. 1992. Estimating the potential for occurrence of DNAPL at superfund sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 9355.4-07FS.
39. Verschueren, K. 2001. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons. Online version available at:
40. Woods, L.M. 2008. In situ remediation induced changes in subsurface properties and trichloroethene partitioning behavior. M.S. thesis, Environmental Science and Engineering Division, Colorado School of Mines.