State-of-the-practice review of in situ thermal technologies

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 64-72

  Triplett Kingston, Jennifer L ^a   Dahlen, Paul R ^b   Johnson, Paul C ^b  

^a HALEY AND ALDRICH INC   (United States)

^b AZ 85281   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER REMEDIATION; CONDUCTIVE HEATING; DESIGN PARAMETERS; ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING; FIELD SCALE; GEOLOGIC SETTINGS; HEATING TECHNOLOGY; IN-SITU; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS; OPERATING CONDITION; PERFORMANCE METRICS; RAPID DEVELOPMENT; SOURCE ZONE; TECHNICAL LITERATURE; THERMAL TECHNOLOGIES;

AQUIFERS; HEATING; REMEDIATION;

TECHNOLOGY;

AQUIFER POLLUTION; DESIGN; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; HEATING; LITERATURE REVIEW; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REMEDIATION;

EID: 78349261219     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: 17456592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2010.01305.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baker, R.S., and J.M. Bierschenk 2001. In-situ thermal destruction makes stringent soil and sediment cleanup goals -attainable. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Fourth Tri-Service Environmental Technology Symposium, San Diego, California, June 18-20.
2. Beyke, G., and D. Fleming 2005. In situ thermal remediation of DNAPL and LNAPL using electrical resistance heating. Remediation, Summer: 5-22.
3. Davis, E.L. 1998. Steam injection for soil and aquifer remediation. Ground Water Issue no. EPA 540-S-97-505. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office.
4. De Percin, P.R. 1991. Demonstration of in situ steam and hot-air stripping technology. Journal of Air and Waste Management 41, no. 6: 873-877.
5. Farouq Ali, S.M., and R.F. Meldau 1979. Current steamflood technology. Journal of Petroleum Technology 31, no. 10: 1332-1342.
6. Groundwater Services Inc. (GSI). 2009. Mass flux toolkit. (accessed June 2006).
7. McGuire, T.M., J.M. McDade, and C.J. Newell 2006. Performance of DNAPL source depletion technologies at 59 chlorinated solvent-impacted sites. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 26, no. 1: 73-84.
8. National Research Council. 2005. Contaminants in the subsurface: Source zone assessment and remediation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
9. Triplett Kingston, J.L. 2008. A critical evaluation of in situ thermal technologies. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Arizona State University.
10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2006. Unified facilities criteria (UFC): Design: In situ thermal remediation. Report prepared by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Publication FC 3-280-05. July 2006.
11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2003. The DNAPL remediation challenge: Is there a case for source depletion? Report prepared by an Expert Panel to the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Publication. EPA/600/R-03/143. December 2003.
12. ™ heating (SPH) at a former manufacturing facility, Skokie, Illinois, October. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Technical Innovation Office. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. USEPA. 1995a. KAI radio frequency heating technology. EPA 540-R-94-528a, January. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. USEPA. 1995b. IITRI radio frequency heating technology. EPA 540-R-94-527a, March. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office.