Similarities and differences between the brain networks underlying allocentric and egocentric spatial learning in rat revealed by cytochrome oxidase histochemistry

Neuroscience

Volumn 223, Issue , 2012, Pages 174-182

  Rubio, S ^b   Begega, A ^a   Mendez M ^a   Mendez Lopez M ^c   Arias, J L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cytochrome oxidase activity; Dentate gyrus; Mammillary bodies; Spatial memory; Strategy; Striatum

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS STRIATUM; DENTATE GYRUS; ENERGY METABOLISM; HIPPOCAMPAL CA3 REGION; HISTOCHEMISTRY; LEARNING; MALE; MAMMILLARY BODY; MAZE TEST; MEDIAL MAMMILLARY NUCLEUS; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; RECALL; SPATIAL LEARNING; SPATIAL MEMORY; SUPRAMAMMILLARY NUCLEUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DENSITOMETRY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; LEARNING; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84865534934     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.066     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aggleton J.P., Brown M.W. Contrasting hippocampal and perirhinal cortex function using immediate early gene imaging. Q J Exp Psychol B 2005, 58:218-233.
2. Aggleton J.P., O'Mara S.M., Vann S.D., Wright N.F., Tsanov M., Erichsen J.T. Hippocampal-anterior thalamic pathways for memory: uncovering a network of direct and indirect actions. Eur J Neurosci 2010, 31:2292-2307.
3. Aranda L., Begega A., Sánchez-López J., Aguirre J.A., Arias J.L., Santín L.J. Temporary inactivation of the supramammillary area impairs spatial working memory and spatial reference memory retrieval. Physiol Behav 2008, 94:322-330.
4. Begega A., Méndez M., Rubio S., Santín L.J., Aller M.A., Arias J., Arias J.L. Portal hypertension in 18-month-old rats: memory deficits and brain metabolic activity. Physiol Behav 2010, 100:135-142.
5. Bird C.M., Burgess N. The hippocampus and memory: insights from spatial processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:182-194.
6. Botreau F., Gisquet-Verrier P. Re-thinking the role of the dorsal striatum in egocentric/response strategy. Front Behav Neurosci 2010, 4:7.
7. Burgess N. Spatial cognition and the brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1124:77-97.
8. Byrne P., Becker S., Burgess N. Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychol Rev 2007, 114:340-375.
9. Chamizo V.D., Rodrigo T., Peris J.M., Grau M. The influence of landmark salience in a navigation task: an additive effect between its components. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2006, 32:339-344.
10. Cimadevilla J.M., Fenton A.A., Bures J. Functional inactivation of dorsal hippocampus impairs active place avoidance in rats. Neurosci Lett 2000, 285:53-56.
11. Colombo P.J. Learning induced activation of transcription factors among multiple memory systems. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2004, 82:268-277.
12. Colombo P.J., Brightwell J.J., Countryman R.A. Cognitive strategy-specific increases in phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein and c-Fos in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum. J Neurosci 2003, 23:3547-3554.
13. Conejo N.M., González-Pardo H., Gonzalez-Lima F., Arias J.L. Spatial learning of the water maze: progression of brain circuits mapped with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2010, 93:362-371.
14. Costa V.C., Bueno J.L., Xavier G.F. Dentate gyrus-selective colchicine lesion and performance in temporal and spatial tasks. Behav Brain Res 2005, 160:286-303.
15. DeCoteau W.E., Kesner R.P. A double dissociation between the rat hippocampus and medial caudoputamen in processing two forms of knowledge. Behav Neurosci 2000, 114:1096-1108.
16. Devan B.D., Hong N.S., McDonald R.J. Parallel associative processing in the dorsal striatum: segregation of stimulus-response and cognitive control subregions. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2011, 96:95-120.
17. Eichenbaum H., Dudchenko P., Wood E., Shapiro M., Tanila H. The hippocampus, memory, and place cells: is it spatial memory or memory space?. Neuron 1999, 23:1-20.
18. Gilbert P.E., Brushfield A.M. The role of the CA3 hippocampal subregion in spatial memory: a process oriented behavioral assessment. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2009, 33:774-781.
19. Gill K.M., Bernstein I.L., Mizumori S.J.Y. Immediate early gene activation in hippocampus and dorsal striatum: effects of explicit place and response training. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2007, 87:583-596.
20. Gonzalez-Lima F., Cada A. Cytochrome oxidase activity in the auditory system of the mouse: a qualitative and quantitative histochemical study. Neuroscience 1994, 63:559-578.
21. Gonzalez-Lima F., Jones D. Quantitative mapping of cytochrome oxidase activity in the central auditory system of the gerbil: a study with calibrated activity standards and metal-intensified histochemistry. Brain Res 1994, 660:34-49.
22. González-Pardo H., Conejo N.M., Lana G., Arias J.L. Different brain networks underlying the acquisition and expression of contextual fear conditioning: a metabolic mapping study. Neuroscience 2012, 202:234-242.
23. Hamilton D.A., Akers K.G., Johnson T.E., Rice J.P., Candelaria F.T., Redhead E.S. Evidence for a shift from place navigation to directional responding in one variant of the Morris water task. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2009, 35:271-278.
24. Hamilton D.A., Akers K.G., Johnson T.E., Rice J.P., Candelaria F.T., Sutherland R.J., Weisend M.P., Redhead E.S. The relative influence of place and direction in the Morris water task. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2008, 34(1):31-53.
25. Ito M., Shirao T., Doya K., Sekino Y. Three-dimensional distribution of Fos-positive neurons in the supramammillary nucleus of the rat exposed to novel environment. Neurosci Res 2009, 64:397-402.
26. Jerman T., Kesner R.P., Hunsaker M.R. Disconnection analysis of CA3 and DG in mediating encoding but not retrieval in a spatial maze learning task. Learn Mem 2006, 13(4):458-464.
27. Kesner R.P., Bolland B.L., Dakis M. Memory for spatial locations, motor responses, and objects: triple dissociation among the hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and extrastriate visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 1993, 93:462-470.
28. Kesner R.P., Lee I., Gilbert P. A behavioral assessment of hippocampal function based on a subregional analysis. Rev Neurosci 2004, 15:333-351.
29. Kubik S., Miyashita T., Guzowski J.F. Using immediate-early genes to map hippocampal subregional functions. Learn Mem 2007, 14:758-770.
30. Leger M., Bouet V., Freret T., Darmaillacq A.S., Dacher M., Dauphin F., Boulouard M., Schumann-Bard P. Environmental enrichment improves recent but not remote memory in association with a modified brain metabolic activation profile in adult mice. Behav Brain Res 2012, 228:22-29.
31. McDonald R.J., White N.M. A triple dissociation of memory systems: hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum. Behav Neurosci 1993, 107:3-22.
32. Méndez-López M., Méndez M., Begega A., Arias J.L. Spatial short-term memory in rats: effects of learning trials on metabolic activity of limbic structures. Neurosci Lett 2010, 483:32-35.
33. Méndez-López M., Méndez M., López L., Cimadevilla J.M., Arias J.L. Hippocampal heterogeneity in spatial memory revealed by cytochrome oxidase. Neurosci Lett 2009, 452:162-166.
34. Miranda R., Blanco E., Begega A., Rubio S., Arias J.L. Hippocampal and caudate metabolic activity associated with different navigational strategies. Behav Neurosci 2006, 120:641-650.
35. Mizumori S.J.Y., Yeshenko O., Gill K.M., Davis D.M. Parallel processing across neural systems: implications for a multiple memory system hypothesis. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2004, 82:278-298.
36. Morris R.G.M., Garrud P., Rawlins J.N.P., O'Keefe J. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 1982, 297:681-683.
37. Moser E.I., Kropff E., Moser M.B. Place cells, grid cells, and the brain's spatial representation system. Ann Rev Neurosci 2008, 31:69-89.
38. O'Keefe J., Nadel L. The hippocampus as a cognitive map 1978, Oxford University Press.
39. Olton D.S., Papas B.S. Spatial memory and hippocampal function. Neurospychologia 1979, 17:669-682.
40. Packard M.G. Anxiety, cognition, and habit: a multiple memory systems perspective. Brain Res 2009, 1293:121-128.
41. Packard M.G. Exhumed from thought: basal ganglia and response learning in the plus-maze. Behav Brain Res 2009, 199:24-31.
42. Packard M.G., McGaugh J.L. Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 1996, 65:66-72.
43. Pan W.X., McNaughton N. The supramammillary area: its organization, functions and relationship to the hippocampus. Prog Neurobiol 2004, 74:127-166.
44. Paxinos G., Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates 1998, Academic Press, New York. fourth ed.
45. Pittenger C., Fasano S., Mazzicchi-Jones D., Dunnett S.B., Kandel E.R., Brambilla R. Impaired bidirectional synaptic plasticity and procedural memory formation in striatum-specific cAMP response element-binding protein deficient mice. J Neurosci 2006, 26:2808-2813.
46. Poirier G.L., Amin E., Aggleton J.P. Qualitatively different hippocampal subfield engagement emerges with mastery of a spatial memory task by rats. J Neurosci 2008, 28:1034-1045.
47. Rich E.L., Shapiro M. Rat prefrontal cortical neurons selectively code strategy switches. J Neurosci 2009, 29:7208-7219.
48. Santín L.J., Aguirre J.A., Rubio S., Begega A., Miranda R., Arias J.L. C-Fos expression in supramammillary and medial mammillary nuclei following spatial reference and working memory tasks. Physiol Behav 2003, 78:733-739.
49. Santín L.J., Rubio S., Begega A., Arias J.L. Effects of mammillary body lesions on spatial reference and working memory tasks. Behav Brain Res 1999, 102:137-150.
50. Satvat E., Schmidt B., Argraves M., Marrone D.F., Markus E.J. Changes in task demands alter the pattern of zif268 expression in the dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 2011, 31:7163-7167.
51. Shahidi S., Motamedi F., Naghdi N. Effect of reversible inactivation of the supramammillary nucleus on spatial learning and memory in rats. Brain Res 2004, 1026:267-274.
52. Sharp P.E., Turner-Williams S. Movement-related correlates of single-cell activity in the medial mammillary nucleus of the rat during a pellet-chasing task. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94:1920-1927.
53. Skinner D.M., Etchegary C.M., Ekert-Maret E.C., Baker C.J., Harley C.W., Evans J.H., Martin G.M. An analysis of response, direction, and place learning in an open field and T maze. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2003, 29:3-13.
54. Sutherland R.J., Whishaw I.Q., Kolb B. A behavioural analysis of spatial localization following electrolytic, kainate- or colchicine-induced damage to the hippocampal formation in the rat. Behav Brain Res 1983, 7:133-153.
55. Vann S.D. Re-evaluating the role of the mammillary bodies in memory. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:2316-2327.
56. Vann S.D. A role for the head-direction system in geometric learning. Behav Brain Res 2011, 224:201-206.
57. Vann S.D., Aggleton J.P. The mammillary bodies: two memory systems in one?. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004, 5:35-44.
58. Vann S.D., Brown M.W., Aggleton J.P. Fos expression in the rostral thalamic nuclei and associated cortical regions in response to different spatial memory tests. Neuroscience 2000, 101:983-991.
59. Whishaw I.Q., McKenna J.E., Maaswinkel H. Hippocampal lesions and path integration. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1997, 7:228-234.
60. White N.M. Some highlights of research on the effects of caudate nucleus lesions over the past 200years. Behav Brain Res 2009, 199:3-23.
61. White N.M., McDonald R.J. Multiple parallel memory systems in the brain of the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2002, 77:125-184.
62. Wong-Riley M.T. Cytochrome oxidase: an endogenous metabolic marker for neuronal activity. Trends Neurosci 1989, 12:94-101.
63. Xavier G.F., Costa V.C. Dentate gyrus and spatial behaviour. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2009, 33:762-773.