Re-thinking the role of the dorsal striatum in egocentric/response strategy

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 4, Issue FEB, 2010, Pages

  Botreau, Fanny ^a   Gisquet Verrier, Pascale ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Behavioural strategy; Cross maze task; Dorsal striatum; Egocentric; Excitotoxic lesions; Memory system; Rat; Response place strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902005844     PISSN: 16625153     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00007     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anguiano-Rodríguez, P. B., Gaytán-Tocavén, L., and Olvera-Cortés, M. E. (2007). Striatal serotonin depletion facilitates rat egocentric learning via dopamine modulation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 556, 91-98.
2. Barth, T. M., Jones, T. A., and Schallert, T. (1990). Functional subdivisions of the rat somatic sensorimotor cortex. Behav. Brain Res. 39, 73-95.
3. Brasted, P. J., Robbins, T. W., and Dunnett, S. B. (1999). Distinct roles for striatal subregions in mediating response processing revealed by focal excitotoxic lesions. Behav. Neurosci. 113, 253-264.
4. Canal, C. E., Stutz, S. J., and Gold, P. E. (2005). Glucose injections into the dorsal hippocampus or dorsolateral striatum of rats prior to T-maze training: modulation of learning rates and strategy selection. Learn. Mem. 12, 367-374.
5. Castro-Alamancos, M. A., and Borrel, J. (1995). Functional recovery of forelimb response capacity after forelimb primary motor cortex damage in the rat is due to the reorganization of adjacent areas of cortex. Neuroscience 68, 793-805.
6. Chang, Q., and Gold, P. E. (2004). Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum impairs acquisition of response learning in cue-deficient, but not cue-available, conditions. Behav. Neurosci. 118, 383-388.
7. Cook, D., and Kesner, R. P. (1988). Caudate nucleus and memory for egocentric localization. Behav. Neural Biol. 49, 332-343.
8. de Bruin, J. P., Moita, M. P., de Brabander, H. M., and Joosten, R. N. (2001). Place and response learning of rats in a Morris water maze: differential effects of fimbria fornix and medial prefrontal cortex lesions. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 75,164-178.
9. de Bruin, J. P., Swinkels, W. A., and de Brabander, J. M. (1997). Response learning of rats in a Morris water maze: involvement of the medical prefrontal cortex. Behav. Brain Res. 85, 47-55.
10. DeCoteau, W. E., and Kesner, R. P. (2000). A double dissociation between the rat hippocampus and medial caudoputamen in processing two forms of knowledge. Behav. Neurosci. 114, 1096-1108.
11. Delatour, B., and Gisquet-Verrier, P. (1996). Prelimbic cortex specific lesions disrupt delayed-variable response tasks in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 110, 1282-1298.
12. Devan, B. D., McDonald, R. J., and White, N. M. (1999). Effects of medial and lateral caudate-putamen lesions on place-and cue-guided behaviors in the water maze: relation to thigmotaxis. Behav. Brain Res. 100, 5-14.
13. Devan, B. D., and White, N. M. (1999). Parallel information processing in the dorsal striatum: relation to hippocampal function. J. Neurosci. 19, 2789-2798.
14. Divac, I. (1968). Functions of the caudate nucleus. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars) 28, 107-120.
15. Divac, I., and Diemer, N. H. (1980). Prefrontal system in the rat visualized by means of labeled deoxyglucose-further evidence for functional heterogeneity of the neostriatum. J. Comp. Neurol. 190, 1-13.
16. Divac, I., Markowitsch, H. J., and Pritzel, M. (1978). Behavioral and anatomical consequences of small intrastriatal injections of kainic acid in the rat. Brain Res. 151, 523-532.
17. Divac, I., Rosvold, H. E., and Szwarcbart, M. K. (1967). Behavioral effects of selective ablation of the caudate nucleus. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 63, 184-190.
18. Donoghue, J. P., and Herkenham, M. (1986). Neostriatal projections from individual cortical fields conform to histochemically distinct striatal compartments in the rat. Brain Res. 365, 397-403.
19. Dunnett, S. B. (1990). Role of prefrontal cortex and striatal output systems in short-term memory deficits associated with ageing, basal forebrain lesions, and cholinergic-rich grafts. Can. J. Psychol. 44, 210-232.
20. Eichenbaum, H. (2001). The hippocampus and declarative memory: cognitive mechanisms and neural codes. Behav. Brain Res. 127, 199-207.
21. Featherstone, R. E., and McDonald, R. J. (2004). Dorsal striatum and stimulus-response learning: lesions of the dorsolateral, but not dorsomedial, striatum impair acquisition of a stimulus-response-based instrumental discrimination task, while sparing conditioned place preference learning. Neuroscience 124, 23-31.
22. Gisquet-Verrier, P., and Delatour, B. (2006). The role of the rat prelimbic/ infralimbic cortex in working memory: not involved in the short-term maintenance but in monitoring and processing functions. Neuroscience 141, 585-596.
23. Hicks, L. H. (1964). Effects of overtraining on acquisition and reversal of place and response learning. Psychol. Rep. 15, 459-462.
24. Kamishina, H., Yurcisin, G. H., Corwin, J. V., and Reep, R. L. (2008). Striatal projections from the lateral posterior thalamic nucleus. Brain Res. 1204, 24-39.
25. Kealy, J., Diviney, M., Kehoe, E., McGonagle, V., O'Shea, A., Harvey, D., and Commins, S. (2008). The effects of overtraining in the Morris water maze on allocentric and egocentric learning strategies in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 192, 259-263.
26. Kesner, R. P., Bolland, B. L., and Dakis, M. (1993). Memory for spatial locations, motor responses, and objects: triple dissociation among the hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and extrastriate visual cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 93, 462-470.
27. Kesner, R. P., Hunt, M. E., Williams, J. M., and Long, J. M. (1996). Prefrontal cortex and working memory for spatial response, spatial location, and visual object information in the rat. Cereb. Cortex 6, 311-318.
28. Kirkby, R. J. (1969). Caudate nucleus lesions impair spontaneous alternation. Percept. Mot. Skills 29, 550.
29. Kolb, B. (1977). Studies on the caudateputamen and the dorsomedial thalamic nucleus of the rat: implications for mammalian frontal-lobe functions. Physiol. Behav. 18, 237-244.
30. Krettek, J. E., and Price, J. L. (1977). The cortical projections of the mediodorsal nucleus and adjacent thalamic nuclei in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 171, 157-191.
31. McCool, M. F., Patel, S., Talati, R., and Ragozzino, M. E. (2008). Differential involvement muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the dorsomedial striatum in task switching. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 89, 114-124.
32. McDonald, R. J., and White, N. M. (1993). A triple dissociation of memory systems: hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum. Behav. Neurosci. 107, 3-22.
33. McDonald, R. J., and White, N. M. (1994). Parallel information processing in the water maze: evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus. Behav. Neural Biol. 61, 260-270.
34. McGauran, A. M., Harvey, D., Cunningham, L., Craig, S., and Commins, S. (2004). Retention of cue-based associations in the water maze is time-dependent and sensitive to disruption by rotating the starting position. Behav. Brain Res. 151, 255-266.
35. Middei, S., Vetere, G., Sgobio, C., and Ammassari-Teule, M. (2007). Landmark-based but not vestibular-based orientation elicits mossy fiber synaptogenesis in the mouse hippocampus. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 87, 174-180.
36. Mishkin, M., and Petri, H. L. (1984). Memories and Habits: Some Implications for the Analysis of Learning and Retention. New York, Guilford.
37. Mitchell, J. A., and Hall, G. (1988). Caudate-putamen lesions in the rat may impair or potentiate maze learning depending upon availability of stimulus cues and relevance of response cues. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 40,243-258.
38. Oliveira, M. G., Bueno, O. F., Pomarico, A. C., and Gugliano, E. B. (1997). Strategies used by hippocampal-and caudate-putamen-lesioned rats in a learning task. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 68, 32-41.
39. Packard, M. G. (1999). Glutamate infused posttraining into the hippocampus or caudate-putamen differentially strengthens place and response learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 12881-12886.
40. Packard, M. G. (2009). Exhumed from thought: basal ganglia and response learning in the plus-maze. Behav. Brain Res. 199, 24-31.
41. Packard, M. G., Hirsh, R., and White, N. M. (1989). Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems. J. Neurosci. 9, 1465-1472.
42. Packard, M. G., and McGaugh, J. L. (1996). Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 65, 65-72.
43. Palencia, C. A., and Ragozzino, M. E. (2004). The influence of NMDA receptors in the dorsomedial striatum on response reversal learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 82, 81-89.
44. Passino, E., Middei, S., Restivo, L., Bertaina-Anglade, V., and Ammassari-Teule, M. (2002). Genetic approach to variability of memory systems: analysis of place vs. response learning and fos-related expression in hippocampal and striatal areas of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice. Hippocampus 12, 63-75.
45. Pisa, M., and Cyr, J. (1990). Regionally selective roles of the rat's striatum in modality-specific discrimination learning and forelimb reaching. Behav. Brain Res. 37, 281-292.
46. Potegal, M. (1969). Role of the caudate nucleus in spatial orientation of rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69, 756-764.
47. Potegal, M. (1972). The caudate nucleus egocentric localization system. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars) 32, 479-494.
48. Ragozzino, M. E. (2007). The contribution of the medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and dorsomedial striatum to behavioral flexibility. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1121, 355-375.
49. Ragozzino, M. E., Jih, J., and Tzavos, A. (2002). Involvement of the dorsomedial striatum in behavioral flexibility: role of muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Brain Res. 953, 205-214.
50. Reading, P. J., Dunnett, S. B., and Robbins, T. W. (1991). Dissociable roles of the ventral, medial and lateral striatum on the acquisition and performance of a complex visual stimulus-response habit. Behav. Brain Res. 45, 147-161.
51. Restle, F. (1957). Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place versus response controversy. Psychol. Rev. 64, 217-228.
52. Ritchie, B. F., Aeschliman, B., and Pierce, P. (1950). Studies in spatial learning: VIII. Place performance and acquisition of place dispositions. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 43, 73-85.
53. Rouanet, H., Bernard, J. M., and Leroux, B. (1990). Statistiques en sciences humaines: Analyse inductive des données. Paris, Dunod.
54. Sesack, S. R., Deutch, A. Y., Roth, R. H., and Bunney, B. S. (1989). Topographical organization of the efferent projections of the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat: an anterograde tract-tracing study with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. J. Comp. Neurol. 290, 213-242.
55. Thompson, M. E., and Thompson, J. P. (1949). Reactive inhibition as a factor in maze learning: II. The role of reactive inhibition in studies of place learning versus response learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 39, 883-891.
56. Thompson, W. G., Guilford, M. O., and Hicks, L. H. (1980). Effects of caudate and cortical lesions on place and response learning in rats. Physiol. Psychol. 8, 473-479.
57. Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., and Kalish, D. (1946). Studies in spatial learning: II. Place learning versus response learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 35, 221-229.
58. Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., and Kalish, D. (1947). Studies in spatial learning: V. Response versus place learning by the noncorrection method. J. Exp. Psychol. 37, 285-292.
59. Tzavos, A., Jih, J., and Ragozzino, M. E. (2004). Differential effects of M1 muscarinic receptor blockade and nicotinic receptor blockade in the dorsomedial striatum on response reversal learning. Behav. Brain Res. 154, 245-253.
60. Van Golf Racht-Delatour, B., and El Massioui, N. (1999). Rule-based learning impairment in rats with lesions to the dorsal striatum. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 72, 47-61.
61. Whishaw, I. Q., Mittleman, G., Bunch, S. T., and Dunnett, S. B. (1987). Impairments in the acquisition, retention and selection of spatial navigation strategies after medial caudate-putamen lesions in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 24, 125-138.
62. Wingard, J. C., and Packard, M. P. (2008). The amygdala and emotional modulation of competition between cognitive and habit memory. Behav. Brain Res. 193, 126-131.
63. Wise, S. P., and Jones, E. G. (1977). Cells of origin and terminal distribution of descending projections of the rat somatic sensory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 175, 129-157.
64. Yin, H. H., and Knowlton, B. J. (2004). Contributions of striatal subregions to place and response learning. Learn. Mem. 11, 459-463.
65. Zurkovsky, L., Brown, S. L., Boyd, S. E., Fell, J. A., and Korol, D. L. (2007). Estrogen modulates learning in female rats by acting directly at distinct memory systems. Neuroscience 144, 26-37.