Visual gaze analysis of robotic pedestrians moving in urban space

Architectural Science Review

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 213-223

  Wong, Aaron S W ^a   Chalup, Stephan K ^a   Bhatia, Shashank ^a   Jalalian, Arash ^a   Kulk, Jason ^a   Nicklin, Steven ^a   Ostwald, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

gaze analysis; localization; manifold learning; pedestrians; robots; saliency; tracking

Indexed keywords

GAZE ANALYSIS; LOCALIZATION; MANIFOLD LEARNING; PEDESTRIANS; SALIENCY;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; DYNAMICS; ROBOTS; SURFACE DISCHARGES; THREE DIMENSIONAL; URBAN PLANNING; VIDEO RECORDING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84865477705     PISSN: 00038628     EISSN: 17589622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2012.688013     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Aschwanden, G., et al., 2009. Evaluation of 3D city models using automatic placed urban agents. In: X. Wang and N. Gu, eds. 9th international conference on construction applications of virtual reality. Sydney: University of Sydney, 165-176.
2. Auchincloss, A. H. and Diez Roux, A. V., 2008. A new tool for epidemiology: the usefulness of dynamic-agent models in understanding place effects on health. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(1), 9-12.
3. Balasubramanian, V. N., Ye, J., and Panchanathan, S., 2007. Biased manifold embedding: a framework for person-independent head pose estimation. IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2007. CVPR'07. Minneapolis: IEEE, 1-7.
4. Bandini, S., Manzoni, S., and Vizzari, G., 2009a. Crowd behavior modeling: from cellular automata to multi-agent systems. In: D. Weyns and A. M. Uhrmacher, eds. Multi-agent systems: simulation and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 301-324.
5. Bandini, S., Manzoni, S., and Vizzari, G., 2009b. Modeling, simulating, and visualizing crowd dynamics with computational tools based on situated cellular agents. In: H. Timmermans, ed. Pedestrian behavior: models, data collection, and applications. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 45-62.
6. Basler, A. G., 2010. Basler A600 specifications. Available from: Basler Vision Technologies: http://www.baslerweb.com/beitraege/unterbeitrag-en-23042. html [Accessed 30 November 2010].
7. de Silva, V. and Tenenbaum, J. B., 2003. Global versus local methods in nonlinear dimensionality reduction. In: S. T. S. Becker and K. Obermayer, eds. Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 15. Cambridge: MIT Press, 721-728.
8. Egan, C., Willis, A., and Wincenciak, J., 2009. The effects of a distractor on the visual gaze behavior of children at signalized road crossings. Journal of Vision, 9(8), 371.
9. Frank, L. D., Engelke, P. O., and Schmidt, T. L., 2003. Health and community design: the impact of the built environment on physical activity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
10. Frintrop, S., Rome, E., and Christensen, H. I., 2010. Computational visual attention systems and their cognitive foundations. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 7(1), 1-39.
11. Gao, Y. and Gu, N., 2009. Complexity, human agents, and architectural design: a computational framework. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 3(6), 115-126.
12. Gouaillier, D., et al., 2009. Mechatronicdesign of NAO humanoid. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2009. ICRA'09. Kobe: IEEE, 769-774.
13. Jalalian, A., Chalup, S. K., and Ostwald, M. J., 2011. Architectural evaluation of simulated pedestrian spatial behaviour. Architectural Science Review, 54(2), 132-140.
14. Magnenat-Thalmann, N. and Thalmann, D., 2005. Virtual humans: thirty years of research, what next?. Visual Computer, 21, 1-19.
15. Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Jain, L. C., and Ichalkaranje, N., eds. 2008. New advances in virtual humans: artificial intelligence environment. Studies in computational intelligence, vol. 140. Berlin: Springer.
16. Maim, J., et al., 2007. Populating ancient Pompeii with crowds of virtual Romans. In: D. B. Arnold, F. Niccolucci, and A. Chalmers, eds. The 8th international symposium on virtual reality, archaeology and cultural heritage (VAST'07). Brighton: Eurographics, 26-30.
17. Molnár, P. and Starke, J., 2001. Control of distributed autonomous robotic systems using principles of pattern formation in nature and pedestrian behavior. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 31(3), 433-435.
18. Murphy-Chutorian, E. and Trivedi, M. M., 2009. Head pose estimation in computer vision: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(4), 607-626.
19. Musse, S. R., Kallmann, M., and Thalmann, D., 1999. Level of autonomy for virtual human agents. Proceedings of 5th European conference on advances in artificial life, ECAL'99. Lausanne: Springer, 345-349.
20. Ono, Y., Okabe, T., and Sato, Y., 2006. Gaze estimation from low resolution images. Pacific-Rim symposium on image and video technology, PSIVT'2006. Hsinchu: Springer, 178-188.
21. Ren, J., et al., 2010. Real-time head pose estimationon mobile platforms. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 8(3), 56-62.
22. Saarloos, D., Kim, J.-E., and Timmermans, H., 2009. The built environment and health: introducing individual space-time behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(6), 1724-1743.
23. Schölkopf, B., et al., 2001. Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Computation, 13(7), 1443-1471.
24. Tenenbaum, J. B., de Silva, V., and Langford, J. C., 2000. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290(5500), 2319-2323.
25. Valenti, R., et al., 2009. Webcam-based visual gaze estimation. In: P. Foggia, C. Sansone, and M. Vento, eds. 15th International conference on image analysis and processing. Vietri sul Mare: Springer, 662-671.
26. van Schaick, J. and van der Spek, S. C., eds. 2008. Urbanism on track: application of tracking technologies in Urbanism. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
27. Vapnik, V. N., 1998. Statistical learning theory. New York: J. Wiley.
28. Vert, R. and Vert, J.-P., 2006. Algorithms, consistency and convergence rates of one-class SVMs and related. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7(6), 817-854.
29. Whyte, W. H., 1980. The social life of small urban spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
30. Wong, A. S., et al., 2011. Humanoid robotics for modelling and analysing visual gaze dynamics of pedestrians moving in urban space. In: R. Hyde, D. Hayman, and D. Canbrera, eds. From principles to practice in architectural science. Anzasca 2011, 45th Annual Conference of the Australian and New Zealand ArchitecturalScience Association. Sydney: University Of Sydney.
31. Zhai, D., et al., 2010. Manifold alignment via corresponding projections. In: F. Labrosse, R. Zwiggelaar, and Y. Liu, eds. Proceedings of the British machine vision conference. Aberystwyth: BMVA Press, 3.1-3.11.
32. Zickler, S., et al., 2010. SSL-vision: the shared vision system for the robocup small size league. In: J. Baltes, M. G. Lagoudakis, T. Naruse, and S. S. Ghidary, eds. RoboCup 2009: Robot Soccer World Cup XIII. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI 5949). Berlin: Springer, 425-436.