Stochastic failure modelling of unidirectional composite ply failure

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 108, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-9

  Whiteside, M B ^a   Pinho, S T ^a   Robinson, P ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Monte Carlo simulation; Sensitivity analysis; Stochastic failure envelope; Unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced composites

Indexed keywords

DETERMINISTIC APPROACH; FAILURE CRITERIA; FAILURE PREDICTION; FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITES; INPUT PARAMETER; MATRIX COMPOSITE; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; PHYSICALLY BASED; SENSITIVITY INDICES; STATISTICAL INTERACTION; STOCHASTIC FAILURES; STOCHASTIC METHODOLOGY; UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITES;

CARBON FIBERS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

EID: 84865472050     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Long M, Narciso J. Probabilistic design methodology for composite aircraft structures. US Dept. of Transportation/Federal Aviation Administration. Rept. DOT/FAA/AR-99/2 1999.
2. T. Philippidis, D. Lekou, and D. Aggelis Mechanical property distribution of CFRP filament wound composites Composite Structures 45 1999 41 50 (Pubitemid 29326457)
3. Daniel, I. Composite materials: testing and design, ASTM International, 1982.
4. J.W. Bristow, and P.E. Irving Safety factors in civil aircraft design requirements Engineering Failure Analysis 14 2007 459 470 (Pubitemid 44718424)
5. V. Verderaime Inherent conservatism in deterministic quasi-static structural analysis NASA 1997 TP-97-206238
6. H. Nakayasu, and Z. Maekawa A comparative study of failure criteria in probabilistic fields and stochastic failure envelopes of composite materials Reliability Engineering & System Safety 56 1997 209 220 (Pubitemid 127381110)
7. C. Boyer, A. Béakou, and M. Lemaire Design of a composite structure to achieve a specified reliability level Reliability Engineering & System Safety 56 1997 273 283 (Pubitemid 127381117)
8. O. Yeniay, R. Unal, and R.A. Lepsch Using dual response surfaces to reduce variability in launch vehicle design: a case study Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91 2006 407 412 (Pubitemid 43031342)
9. R.C. Soares, A. Mohamed, W.S. Venturini, and M. Lemaire Reliability analysis of non-linear reinforced concrete frames using the response surface method Reliability Engineering & System Safety 75 2002 1 16 (Pubitemid 33142181)
10. P. Gayathri, K. Umesh, and R. Ganguli Effect of matrix cracking and material uncertainty on composite plates Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95 2010 716 728
11. S. Sriramula, and M. Chryssanthopoulos Quantification of uncertainty modelling in stochastic analysis of FRP composites Composites Part A 40 2009 1673 1684
12. J.C. Helton Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal Reliability Engineering & System Safety 42 1993 327 367
13. C. Conceição António, and L.N. Hoffbauer Uncertainty analysis based on sensitivity applied to angle-ply composite structures Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92 2007 1353 1362 (Pubitemid 46908976)
14. T. Homma, and A. Saltelli Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety 52 1996 1 17 (Pubitemid 126374988)
15. A.S. Kaddour, M.J. Hinton, and P.D. Soden A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: additional contributions Composites Science and Technology 64 2004 449 476 (Pubitemid 38043347)
16. P. Soden, M. Hinton, and A. Kaddour Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates Composites Science and Technology 58 1998 1011 1022 (Pubitemid 28497254)
17. P.D. Soden, M.J. Hinton, A.S. Kaddour, M.J. Hinton, A.S. Kaddour, and P.D. Soden Biaxial test results for strength and deformation of a range of E-glass and carbon fibre reinforced composite laminates: Failure exercise benchmark data Failure Criteria in Fibre-Reinforced-Polymer Composites 2004 Elsevier Oxford pp. 52-96
18. M.J. Hinton, and P.D. Soden Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise Composites Science and Technology 58 1998 1001 1010 (Pubitemid 28497253)
19. M.J. Hinton, A.S. Kaddour, and P.D. Soden A further assessment of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: comparison with experimental evidence Composites Science and Technology 64 2004 549 588 (Pubitemid 38043352)
20. P.D. Soden, M.J. Hinton, and A.S. Kaddour A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates Composites Science and Technology 58 1998 1225 1254 (Pubitemid 28501310)
21. S.W. Tsai, and E.M. Wu A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials Journal of Composite Materials 5 1971 58 80
22. V. Azzi, and S. Tsai Anisotropic strength of composites Experimental Mechanics 5 1965 283 288
23. A. Puck, and H. Schürmann Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models Composites Science and Technology 62 2002 1633 1662
24. C. Sun, and J. Tao Prediction of failure envelopes and stress/strain behaviour of composite laminates Composites Science and Technology 58 1998 1125 1136 (Pubitemid 28497262)
25. S.T. Pinho, L. Iannucci, and P. Robinson Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking: Part I: development Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 37 2006 63 73 (Pubitemid 41828380)
26. R. Cuntze, and A. Freund The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates Composites Science and Technology 64 2004 343 377 (Pubitemid 38043344)
27. Z. Hashin, and A. Rotem A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials Journal of Composite Materials 7 1973 448 464
28. P. Gotsis, C. Chamis, and L. Minnetyan Application of progressive fracture analysis for predicting failure envelopes and stress-strain behaviors of composite laminates: a comparison with experimental results Composites Science and Technology 62 2002 1545 1559
29. P. Camanho, C. Dávila, S. Pinho, L. Iannucci, and P. Robinson Prediction of in situ strengths and matrix cracking in composites under transverse tension and in-plane shear Composites Part A 37 2006 165 176 (Pubitemid 43220671)
30. Pinho S, Dávila C, Camanho P, Iannucci L, Robinson P. Failure models and criteria for FRP under in-plane or three-dimensional stress states including shear non-linearity, NASA Technical Memorandum. p. 213530.
31. S.T. Pinho, L. Iannucci, and P. Robinson Physically based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking Part II: FE implementation Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 37 2006 766 777
32. I. Sobol Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models Mathematical Modeling & Computational Experiment 1 1993 407 414
33. T. Homma, and A. Saltelli Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of model output Reliability Engineering & System Safety 52 1996 1 17 (Pubitemid 126374988)
34. C. Dávila, P. Camanho, and C. Rose Failure criteria for FRP laminates Journal of Composite Materials 39 2005 323
35. I. Sobol On sensitivity estimation for nonlinear mathematical models Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2 1990 112 118
36. H. Harter, and A. Moore Maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of gamma and Weibull populations from complete and from censored samples Technometrics 1965 639 643
37. W. Weibull A statistical distribution function of wide applicability Journal of Applied Mechanics 18 1951 293 297
38. D. ASTM, 3039/D 3039M-00. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.
39. D. ASTM, 3410/D 3410M-95. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsopported gage section by Shera loading. American Society for Testing and Materials. West Conshohocken, PA.
40. D. ASTM, 3518, D 3518M-94. Standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a; (Reapproved 2001).