Safety factors in civil aircraft design requirements

Engineering Failure Analysis

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 459-470

  Bristow, John W ^a   Irving, P E ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aircraft structural integrity; Certification; Regulations; Safety factors

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CIVIL AVIATION; CYCLIC LOADS; HELICOPTERS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SAFETY FACTOR; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS; CIVIL AIRCRAFT DESIGN; PROBABILITY OF EVENT OCCURENCE;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CIVIL AVIATION; CYCLIC LOADS; HELICOPTERS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SAFETY FACTOR; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

EID: 33750889882     PISSN: 13506307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anon. Airworthiness of aircraft, Annex 8 to the convention on international civil aviation. 9th ed. ICAO, Montreal; July 2001.
2. Anon. Regulation (EC) No. 1592/2002 of The European Parliament and of The Council, Brussels; July 2002.
3. Anon. Part 21, Annexe 1, Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1702/2003, Brussels; September 2003.
4. Anon. Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes CS-25. European Aviation Safety Agency, Brussels; October 2003.
5. Anon. Composite aircraft structures, ACJ 25.603, ACJ-subpart D, Section 2, JAR 25 large aeroplanes, Change 11. Joint Aviation Authorities, Hoofddorp; October 1989.
6. Anon. General information, part one, Section 1, administrative and guidance material. Joint Aviation Authorities, Hoofddorp; January 1996.
7. Anon. Title 14, Aeronautics and space, Chapter 1. Federal Aviation Administration, Code of Federal Regulations, Washington (DC).
8. Anon. Subpart C structures, JAR 25 large aeroplanes, Change 15. Joint Aviation Authorities, Hoofddorp; October 2001.
9. Private communication. Structures & Materials Dept. Civil Aviation Authority, Gatwick Airport; 2002.
10. Anon. Sub-part D design and construction, JAR 25 large aeroplanes, Change 15. Joint Aviation Authorities, Hoofddorp; October 2001.
11. Anon. AMJ 25.1309, System design and analysis, JAR 25 large aeroplanes, Change 15. Joint Aviation Authorities, Hoofddorp; October 2001.
12. Anon. NPA 25C-199 Interaction of systems and structures (Revision 1). Joint Aviation Authorities, Hoofddorp; April 2002.
13. Bristow J, West C. Key point summary, fatigue issues & experience in Certification of composite structures. In: Proceedings of the ICAF'97 Workshop, Edinburgh; June 1997.
14. Anon. FAR 29-571, Fatigue evaluation of structure, Amdt29-28. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington; October 1989.
15. Anon. Fatigue tolerance evaluation of transport category rotorcraft metallic structure, MG11, Chapter 3, AC29-2C. Federal Aviation Administration.
16. Maxwell RDJ. Fail-safe philosophy p.1.1/8, TR 73183 Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough; March 1973.
17. Bristow J. The meaning of life (2000), The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, London p. 267/268
18. Machlin J. Performance of fuselage pressure structure pp67-74 NASA CP 3160; 1992.
19. McGuire J, Foucault J. Recommendations for regulatory action to prevent widespread fatigue damage in the commercial airplane fleet. Final report of the Airworthiness Assurance Working Group; March 1999.
20. Gopinath K, Carter A. Widespread fatigue damage bridging task -multiple element damage. Final report of the Airworthiness Assurance Working Group; July 2003.
21. Irving PE, Lin J, Bristow JW. Damage tolerance in helicopters, report on the round robin challenge. In: Proceedings of the 59th forum American helicopter society, Phoenix; May 2003.
22. Anon. CAP 681 Global fatal accident review 1980-96. Civil Aviation Authority, London; March 1998.