A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: Additional contributions

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 449-476

  Kaddour, A S ^a   Hinton, M J ^a   Soden, P D ^b  

^a QINETIQ   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

B. Stress strain curves; Failure criteria; Multiaxial failure envelopes

Indexed keywords

FAILURE ANALYSIS; FIBER REINFORCED MATERIALS; POLYMERS; STRAIN; STRESS ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL LOADS;

IN-PLANE LOADING CONDITIONS;

LAMINATED COMPOSITES;

FAILURE ANALYSIS; FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; STRESS-STRAIN PROPERTY; THEORY;

EID: 0346785334     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00226-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hinton M.J. Soden P.D. Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1001-1010
2. Soden P.D. Hinton M.J. Kaddour A.S. Lamina properties and lay-up configurations and loading conditions of a range fibre reinforced composite laminates Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1011-1022
3. Gotsis P.K. Chamis C.C. Minnetyan L. Prediction of composite laminate fracture: micromechanics and progressive fracture Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1137-1150
4. Eckold G.C. Failure criteria for use in the design environment Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1095-1106
5. Edge E.C. Stress based Grant-Sanders method for predicting failure of composite laminates Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1043-1044
6. McCartney L.N. Predicting transverse crack formation in cross-ply laminate Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1069-1082
7. Hart-Smith L.J. Predictions of the original and truncated maximum strain failure models for certain fibrous composite laminates Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1151-1178
8. Hart-Smith L.J. Predictions of a generalised maximum-shear-stress failure criterion for certain fibrous composite laminates Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1179-1208
9. Puck A. Schürmann H. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1045-1068
10. Rotem A. Prediction of laminate failure with Rotem failure criterion Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1083-1094
11. Sun C.T. Tao J.X. Prediction of failure envelopes and stress strain behaviours of composite laminates Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1125-1136
12. Liu K.-S. Tsai S.W. A progressive quadratic failure criterion of a laminate Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1023-1032
13. Wolfe W.E. Butalia T.S. A strain energy based failure criterion for nonlinear analysis of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loading Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1107-1124
14. Zinoviev P. Grigoriev S.V. Labedeva O.V. Tairova L.R. Strength of multilayered composites under plane stress state Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1209-1224
15. Soden P.D. Hinton M.J. Kaddour A.S. Comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates Compos Sci Tech. 58 1998 1225-1254
16. Hart-Smith L.J. Expanding the capabilities of the ten-percent rule for predicting the strength of fibre-polymer composites Compos Sci Tech. 62 2002 1515-1544
17. Bogetti TA, Hoppel CPR, Harik VM, Newill JF, Burns BP. Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates. In this issue.
18. Cuntze RG, Freund A. The predictive capability of failure mode concept based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates. In this issue.
19. Mayes S, Hansen AC. Composite laminate failure analysis using multicontinuum theory. In this issue.
20. Huang ZM. A bridging model prediction of the tensile strength of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loads. In this issue.
21. Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS, Soden PD. Further assessment of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: Comparison with experimental evidence. In this issue.
22. Hinton M.J. Kaddour A.S. Soden P.D. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates, judged against experimental evidence Compos Sci Tech. 62 2002 1725-1798