Multidimensional risk analysis of hydrogen pipelines

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 37, Issue 18, 2012, Pages 13545-13554

  Lins, P H C ^a   De Almeida, A T ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Hydrogen pipeline; Multi attribute utility theory; Multicriteria decision model; Multidimensional risk analysis

Indexed keywords

CONVENTIONAL FUEL; DECISION MAKER'S PREFERENCES; DECISION PROCESS; DELIVERY PROCESS; FINANCIAL RISKS; HYDROGEN PIPELINES; MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY; MULTICRITERIA DECISION; NEW FORMS; NUMERICAL APPLICATIONS; PRODUCTION PLANT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SPECIFIC ENERGY; SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION;

FOSSIL FUELS; GLOBAL WARMING; HYDROGEN; MODELS; SUPPLY CHAINS;

PIPELINES;

EID: 84865467545     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.078     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. M.A. Rosen, I. Dincer, and M. Kanoglu Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact Energy Policy 36 2008 128 137
2. A. Midilli, and I. Dincer Hydrogen as a renewable and sustainable solution in reducing global fossil fuel consumption Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 2008 4209 4222
3. Y.D. Jo, and B.J. Ahn Analysis of hazard area associated with hydrogen gas transmission pipelines Int J Hydrogen Energy 31 2006 2122 2130
4. H. Dagdougui Models, methods and approaches for the planning and design of the future hydrogen supply chain Int J Hydrogen Energy 37 6 2012 5318 5327
5. P.R. Smith, A.S. Bingham, and J.R. Swartz Generation of hydrogen from NADPH using an [FeFe] hydrogenase Int J Hydrogen Energy 37 2012 2977 2983
6. A. Campen, K. Mondal, and T. Wiltowski Separation of hydrogen from syngas using a regenerative system Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 2008 322 339
7. H. Dagdougui, E. Garbolino, O. Paladino, and R. Sacile Hazard and risk evaluation in hydrogen pipelines Manag Environ Qual Int J 21 5 2010 712 725
8. B. Gim, K.J. Boo, and S.M. Cho A transportation model approach for constructing the cost effective central hydrogen supply system in Korea Int J Hydrogen Energy 37 2012 1162 1172
9. C. Yang, and J. Ogden Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 2007 268 286
10. Y. Peet, P. Sagaut, and Y. Charron Pressure loss reduction in hydrogen pipelines by surface restructuring Int J Hydrogen Energy 34 2009 8964 8973
11. M. Conte, A. Iacobazzi, M. Ronchetti, and R. Vellone Hydrogen economy for a sustainable development: state-of-the-art and technological perspectives J Power Sourc 100 2001 171 187
12. R.R. Dickinson, D.L. Battye, V.M. Linton, P.J. Ashman, and G.J. Nathan Alternative carriers for remote renewable energy sources using existing CNG infrastructure Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 1321 1329
13. G.A. Papadakis Major hazard pipelines: a comparative study of onshore transmission accidents J Loss Prev Process Indust 12 1999 91 107
14. R.L. Keeney, and H. Raiffa Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs 1976 John Wiley & Sons UK
15. M.H. Alencar, and A.T. Almeida Assigning priorities to actions in a pipeline transporting hydrogen based on a multicriteria decision model Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 3610 3619
16. A.J. Brito, and A.T. Almeida Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipeline Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94 2009 187 198
17. D. Yuhua, and Y. Datao Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis J Loss Prev Process Indust 18 2005 83 88
18. D.A. Crowl, and Y.D. Jo The hazards and risks of hydrogen J Loss Prev Process Indust 20 2007 158 164
19. S. Sklavounos, and F. Rigas Estimation of safety distances in the vicinity of fuel gas pipelines J Loss Prev Process Indust 19 2006 24 31
20. J.A. Vílchez, V. Espejo, and J. Casal Generic event trees and probabilities for the release of different types of hazardous materials J Loss Prev Process Indust 24 2011 281 287
21. H. Wilkening, and D. Baraldi CFD modelling of accidental hydrogen release from pipelines Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 2007 2206 2215
22. N.R. Mirza, S. Degenkolbe, and W. Witt Analysis of hydrogen incidents to support risk assessment Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 12068 12077
23. A.T. Almeida Multicriteria modelling of Repair Contract based on utility and ELECTRE I method with Dependability and Service Quality criteria Ann Oper Res 138 2005 113 126
24. C.M.M. Mota, A.T. Almeida, and L.H. Alencar A multiple criteria decision model for assigning priorities to activities in project management Int J Proj Manag 27 2 2009 175 181
25. D.A. Crowl, and J.F. Louvar Chemical process safety: fundamentals with applications 3rd ed. 2011 Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River
26. J.O. Berger Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis 2nd ed. 1985 Springer-Verlag New York
27. Y.D. Jo, and B.J. Ahn Analysis of hazard areas associated with high-pressure natural gas pipelines J Loss Prev Process Indust 15 2002 179 186
28. IEC 60079-10 - International Electrotechnical Comission. Electrical apparatus for explosive gas atmospheres - Part 10: Classification of hazardous areas. Reference number: IEC 60079-10:2002(E).
29. H. Raiffa Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty 1970 Addison-Wesley USA
30. A.J. Brito, A.T. Almeida, and C.M.M. Mota A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating utility theory Eur J Oper Res 200 2010 812 821
31. A.T. Almeida Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method Comput Oper Res 34 12 2007 3569 3574
32. R. Margalef Information theory in ecology Int J Gen Syst 3 1958 36 71
33. A.E. Magurran Measuring biological diversity 2004 Blackwell Publishing Company Australia
34. J. Lachance, A. Tchouvelev, and A. Engebo Development of uniform harm criteria for use in quantitative risk analysis of the hydrogen infrastructure Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 2381 2388
35. C.K. Tsao, and W.W. Perry Modifications to the vulnerability model: a simulation system for assessing damage resulting from marine spills Final Report 1979 Mar US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard, Office of Research and Development Washington, DC Report No.: ADA075231
36. TNO Green Book Methods for the determination of possible damage 1989 TNO Rijswijk, The Netherlands
37. N.A. Eisenberg, C.J. Lynch, and R.J. Breeding Vulnerability model: a simulation system for assessing damage resulting from marine spills Final Report 1975 Jun US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard, Office of Research and Development Washington, DC Report No.: ADA015245
38. A.H. Rausch, N.A. Eisenberg, and C.J. Lynch Continuing development of the vulnerability model (VM2) Final Report 1977 Feb US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard, Office of Research and Development Washington, DC Report No.: ADA044197
39. API RP 521 Recommended practice 521 3rd ed. 1990 API Washington, DC
40. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for evaluating the characteristics of vapor cloud explosions, flash fire, and BLEVEs 1994 Wiley-AIChE US 260 p.
41. TNO Yellow Book Methods for the calculation of the physical effects of the escape of dangerous material 1989 TNO Rijswijk, The Netherlands
42. Engineering Council Guidance on risk for the engineering profession 2011 The Engineering Council London
43. K. Lawson Pipeline corrosion risk analysis: an assessment of deterministic and probabilistic methods Anti-Corros Method M 52 1 2005 3 10