Alternative carriers for remote renewable energy sources using existing CNG infrastructure

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1321-1329

  Dickinson, Robert R ^a   Linton, Valerie M ^a  

^a Gus) J   (Australia)

Author keywords

CNG pipelines; Electrolysis; Energy carrier; Methanation; Renewable source; Transport economics

Indexed keywords

CNG PIPELINES; ENERGY CARRIER; ENERGY CARRIERS; RENEWABLE SOURCES; TRANSPORT ECONOMICS;

ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTROLYSIS; ENERGY HARVESTING; HYDROGEN; HYDROGENATION; METHANATION; METHANE; OPERATING COSTS; PIPELINES;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

EID: 74849132401     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.052     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Australian Geothermal Energy Group (AGEG). Australian geothermal implementing agreement annual report - 2008 (17 July 2009). http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/geothermal
2. th workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford CA (Feb 2009). http://geothermal.stanford.edu/SGW/default.htm
3. Huttenrauch D., and Muller-Syring G. European commission, sixth framework programme, naturalhy project, assessment of repair and rehabilitation technologies relating to the transport of hythan (hydrogen-methane-mixture), Report no. R0016-WP4-P-0 (Feb 2006). http://naturalhy.net/
4. Florisson O, Alliat I, Lowesmith B, Hankinson G. The value of the existing natural gas system for hydrogen, the sustainable future energy carrier (progress obtained in the NATURALHY project). 23rd World Gas Conference, Amsterdam; 2006. http://naturalhy.net/
5. Haeseldonckx D., and D'haeseleer W. The use of the natural-gas pipeline infrastructure for hydrogen transport in a changing market structure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 1381-1386
6. Mahmah B., Harouadi F., Benmoussa H., Chader S., Belhamel M., M'Raoui A., et al. MedHySol: future federator project of massive production of solar hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 11 (2009) 4922-4933
7. Report of Second Panel Forum. Hydrogen pipeline transmission: updates & opportunities. ASME 6th International Pipeline Conference, Telus Convention Centre; September 25th, 2006.
8. Oney F., Veziroglu T.N., and Dulger Z. Evaluation of pipeline transportation of hydrogen and natural gas mixtures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 19 10 (1994) 813-822
9. Adams T. Evaluation of natural gas pipeline materials hydrogen service. Materials technology section. DOE Hydrogen Pipeline R&D Project Review Meeting (January 5-6, 2005), Savannah River National Laboratory. http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/
10. Adams T., Rawls G., Lam P.S., and Sindelar R. Evaluation of natural gas pipeline materials and infrastructure for hydrogen/ mixed gas service (August 30-31, 2005), Savannah River National Laboratory. http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/
11. Bedel L., and Junker M. Natural gas pipelines for hydrogen transportation. WHEC2006 abstract. http://www.cder.dz/
12. Kaske G., and Plenard F.J. High purity hydrogen distribution network for industrial use in Western Europe. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 10 7/8 (1985) 479-482
13. Thompson A.W., and Bernstein I.M. Selection of structural materials for hydrogen pipelines and storage vessels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2 2 (1977) 163-173
14. Nelson HG. Review: materials and safety problems associated with hydrogen containment. WHEC1984; 1984.p. 1225-36
15. Gray H.R., Nelson H.G., Johnson R.E., McPherson W.B., Howard F.S., and Swisher J.H. Potential structural material problems in a hydrogen energy system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 3 1 (1978) 105-118
16. Ball M., and Wietschel M. The future of hydrogen - opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 2 (2009) 615-627
17. Cifre P.G., and Badr O. Renewable hydrogen utilisation for the production of methanol. Energy Conversion and Management 48 2 (2007) 519-527
18. Hashimoto K., Tako Z., Kumagai N., and Izumiya K. Materials and technology for supply of renewable energy and prevention of global warming. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 144 (2009) 012009 IOP Publishing
19. Hashimoto K., Habazaki H., Yamasaki M., Meguro S., Sasaki T., Katagiri H., et al. Advanced materials for global carbon dioxide recycling. Materials Science and Engineering A304-306 (2001) 88-96
20. Scott DS. Smelling land - the hydrogen defense against climate catastrophe, canadian hydrogen association, www.h2.ca.
21. Balta M.T., Dincer I., and Hepbasli A. Thermodynamic assessment of geothermal energy use in hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009) 2925-2939
22. Cheng S., Xing D., Call D.F., Call, and Logan B.E. Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis. Environmental Science Technology 43 10 (2009) 3953-3958
23. Gretz J., Korf W., and Lyons R. Hydrogen in the steel industry. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 16 10 (1991) 691-693
24. McLellan B.C. Potential opportunities and impacts of a hydrogen economy for the Australian minerals industry. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 9 (2009) 3571-3577
25. Great Artesian Basin Consultative Council. Great artesian basin resource study (Nov 1998). http://www.gabcc.org.au/public/content/ViewCategory.aspx?id=41 [accessed Mar 2009]
26. Herczeg A.L., and Love A.J. Review of recharge mechanisms for the great artesian basin, report to the great artesian basin coordinating committee under the auspices of a consultancy agreement (November 2007), Commonwealth Dept of Environment and Water Resources, Canberra. http://www.gabcc.org.au/public/content/ViewItem.aspx?id=159 [accessed March 2009]
27. National Gas Market Bulletin Board (Australia). Actual flow data. http://www.gasbb.com.au/default.aspx
28. 2 emissions by adding hydrogen to natural gas, Report number PH4/24 (October 2003). www.senternovem.nl/mmfiles/hydrogen_in_natural_gas-iea-2003_tcm24-280190.pdf accessed Dec 2008
29. SAI Global. AS 4564-2005 Specification for general purpose natural gas. http://infostore.saiglobal.com/store/Details.aspx?docn=AS0733768806AT
30. Epic Energy South Australia. Schedules for access arrangement for MAPS, (Moomba to Adelaide Pipeline System); June 2001.
31. Butler M.S., Moran C.W., Sunderland P.B., and Axelbaum R.L. Limits for hydrogen leaks that can support stable flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 12 (2009) 5174-5182
32. Van Dijk G.H.J. Hydrogen enrichment of natural gas - consequences for performance, emissions and control of natural gas engines in dutch co-generation. www.getgasunie.nl/download/publications/PGE2006%20van%20Dijk.pdf [accessed Dec 2008]
33. SAI Global. AS 2885 Set-2008, pipelines - gas and liquid petroleum set. http://infostore.saiglobal.com/store/Details.aspx?docn=AS129907590845
34. Aihara S, Ostby E, Lange HI, Misawa K, Imai Y, Thaulow C. Burst tests for high-pressure hydrogen gas line pipes. Paper IPC2008-64166, Proceedings of IPC 2008, 7th international pipeline conference. Calgary, Alberta, Canada; September 29-October 3 2008.
35. Alliat I., and Heerings J. Assessing the durability and integrity of natural gas infrastructures for transporting and distributing mixtures of hydrogen and natural gas (2005), International Conference on Hydrogen Safety ICHS
36. Handbook A.S.M. Hydrogen damage and embrittlement. Failure Analysis and Prevention 11 (2007) 809-822
37. ASME B31.12. Hydrogen piping and pipelines. http://www.asme.org/
38. Cheng Y.F. Analysis of electrochemical hydrogen permeation through X-65 pipeline steel and its implications on pipeline stress corrosion cracking. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 1269-1276
39. Cialone H.J., and Holbrook J.H. Effects of gaseous hydrogen on fatigue crack growth in pipeline steel. Metallurgical Transactions A 16A (January 1985) 115
40. Cialone H.J., and Holbrook J.H. Sensitivity of steels to degradation in gaseous hydrogen. ASTM STP. Hydrogen Embrittlement: Prevention and Control 962 (1988) 134-152
41. CGA G-5.6 CGA G-5.6. "Hydrogen Pipeline Systems", The Compressed Gas Association.
42. Gabetta G., Nykyforchyn H.M., Lunarska E., Zonta P.P., Tsyrulnyk O.T., Nikiforov K., et al. In-service degradation of gas trunk pipeline X52 steel. Materials Science 44 1 (2008) 104-119
43. Hardie D., Charles E.A., and Lopez A.H. Hydrogen embrittlement of high strength pipeline steels. Corrosion Science 48 (2006) 4378-4385
44. 2 and biogas: exploring new uses for natural gas pipelines. Hilton Hotel, Amsterdam; 30-31 May 2007.
45. Jasionowski W.J., Pangborn J.B., and Johnson D.G. Gas distribution equipment in hydrogen service. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 5 (1980) 323-336
46. 2 pipeline. The Oil and Gas Journal 88 22 (May 28, 1990) 83 (6)
47. Ritchie R.O. Application of fracture mechanics to fatigue, corrosion-fatigue and hydrogen embrittlement. In: Sih G.C., and Mirabile M. (Eds). Analytical and experimental fracture mechanics (1981) 81-108
48. Trasatti S.P., Sivieri E., and Mazza F. Susceptibility of a X80 steel to hydrogen embrittlement. Materials and Corrosion 56 2 (2005) p111-p117
49. Zawierucha R, Xu K, Rana M. Hydrogen pipeline steels. In: Proceedings of the MS&T'O5 conference: materials science and technology; 2005
50. Rostrup-Nielsen J.R., Pedersen K., and Sehested J. High temperature methanation sintering and structure sensitivity. Applied Catalysis A: General 330 (2007) 134-138
51. Sabatier P., and Senderens J.B. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences ParisC.R. Académie Des Sciences Paris 134 (1902) 514
52. Hashimoto K., Takano H., Izumiya K., Kumagai N., Kato Z., and Shinomiya H. US patent application 20090042998 -catalyst for methanation of carbon oxides, preparation method of the catalyst and process for the methanation, filed 1 Aug, (2008). http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20090042998.html [accessed Mar 2009]
53. Orchison K. Gas price explosion, business spectator - powerline (24 July 2009). http://www.businessspectator.com.au/
54. AEMO. http://www.aemo.org.au/
55. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. State of the energy market (2008). http://www.accc.gov.au/
56. McLennan Magasanik Associates, Preliminary assessment of the value of a new 275 kV transmission line to connect geothermal resources to the NEM in South Australia, 1 September 2009, http://www.agea.org.au/media/docs/transmission_for_geothermal_power_in_sa.pdf.