Gradience in split intransitivity: The end of the unaccusative hypothesis?

Archivio Glottologico Italiano

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 67-86

  Sorace, Antonella ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865443370     PISSN: 00040207     EISSN: 2239740X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. ALEXIADOU, A., ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, E. & EVERAERT, M. (eds.) 2004. The unaccusativity puzzle: explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. ARANOVICH, R. 2003. The semantics of auxiliary selection in Old Spanish, "Studies in Language", 27: 1-37.
3. BALCOM, P. 1997. Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity, "Second Language Research", 13: 1-9.
4. BARD, E.G., ROBERTSON, D. & SORACE, A. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability, "Language", 71: 32-68.
5. BARD, E.G., FRENCK-MESTRE, C. & SORACE, A. 2010. Processing auxiliary selection with Italian intransitive verbs, "Linguistics", 48.2: 325-362.
6. BENTLEY, D. 2006. Split Intransitivity in Italian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. BENTLEY, D. & EYTHORSSON, T. 2003. Auxiliary selection and the semantics of unaccusatives, "Lingua", 114: 447-471.
8. BENZING, JOSEPH. 1931. Zur Geschichte von ser als Hilfizeitwort bei den Intransitiven Verben im Spanischen, "Zeitschrift fur romanische Philologie", 51: 385-460.
9. BORER, H. 1994. The projection of arguments. In E. BENEDICTO & J. RUNNER (eds.). Functional Projections. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
10. BORER, H. 2005. The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. BORNKESSEL-SCHLESEWSKY, I. & SCHLESEWSKY, M. 2008. An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension, "Brain Research Reviews", 59: 55-73.
12. BRINKMANN, U. 2002. Choice of auxiliaryfor intransitive verbs ofmotion: an analysis of an unaccusative diagnostic. Ms., Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics: Nijmegen.
13. BURZIO, L. 1986. Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Foris: Dordrecht.
14. CENNAMO, M. 2008. The rise and development of analytic perfects in Italo-Romance. In T. EYTHORSSON (ed.) Grammatical change and linguistic theory: the Rosendal papers, 115-142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. CENNAMO, M. & SORACE, A. 2007. Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexicon interface: evidence from Paduan. In R. ARANOVICH (ed.) Split Auxiliary Systems, A Cross- linguistic Perspective, 65-100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. CREISSELS, D. 2008. Remarks on split intransitivity and fluid intransivity. In O. BONAMI & P. CABREDO HOFHERR (eds.) "Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics", 7: 139-168.
17. Dowry, D. 1991. Thematicproto-roles and argument selection, "Language", 67, 547-619.
18. DUFFIELD, N. 2003. Measures of competent gradience. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken & Towell, R. (eds.) The Lexicon-Syntax Interface in Second Language Acquisition, 97-128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. FANSELOW, G., FERY, C., VOGEL, R. & SCHLESEWSKY, M. (eds.) 2006. Gradience in grammar: generative perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. FOLU, R. & HARLEY, H. 2006. On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: waltzing Matilda all over, "Studia Linguistica", 60: 121-155.
21. FRIEDMANN, N., TARANTO, G., SHAPIRO, L. & SWINNEY, D. 2008. The leaf fell (the leaf): the online processing of unaccusatives, "Linguistic Inquiry", 39: 355-377.
22. GREWENDORF, G. 1989. Ergativity in German. Dordrecht: Foris.
23. HAGOORT, P., BROWN, C.M. & GROOTHUSEN, J. 1993. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing, "Language and Cognitive Processes", 8: 439-483.
24. HIRAKAWA, M. 2001. L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs, "Studies in Second Language Acquisition", 23: 21-245.
25. KAUFMANN, I. 1995. O- and D-predicates: a semantic approach to the unaccusative- unergative distinction, "Journal of Semantics", 12: 377-427.
26. KELLER, F. & SORACE, A. 2003. Gradient auxiliary selection and impersoruzlpassivization in German: an experimental investigation, "Journal of Linguistics" 39: 57-108.
27. KUTAS, M. & HILLYARD, S. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity, "Science", 207: 203-205.
28. KUTAS, M. & FEDERMEIER, K. 2000. Electrophysiobgy reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension, "Trends in Cognitive Sciences", 4: 463-470.
29. LEGENDRE, G. 2007. On the typology of auxiliary selection, "Lingua", 117: 1522- 1540.
30. LEGENDRE, G. & KNIPE, H. 2003. From Latin to Modern French: Tracing the evolution of auxiliary selection. Ms., Johns Hopkins University.
31. LEGENDRE, G., MIYATA, Y. & SMOLENSKY, P. 1991. Unifying syntactic and semantic approaches to unaccusativity: a connectionist approach. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 156-167. Berkeley, CA.
32. LEGENDRE, G. & SORACE, A. 2003. Auxiliaires et intransitive en francais et dans les langues romanes. In D. GODARD (ed.), Les langues romanes; problbnes de la phrase simple, 185-234. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
33. LEVIN, B. & RAPPAPORT HOVAV, M. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. LEVIN, B. & RAPPAPORT HOVAV, M. 2005. From Lexical Semantics to Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. MATEU, J. 2005. Arguing our way to the Direct Object Restriction on English resultatives, "Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics", 8: 55-82.
36. MATEU, J. 2009. Gradience and Auxiliary Selection in Old Catalan and Old Spanish. In DINS P. CRISMA & G. LONGOBARDI (eds.) Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory, 176-193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. MCCLURE, W. 1995. Syntactic Projections of the Semantic of Aspect. Tokyo: Hitsujishobo.
38. MCFADDEN, T. 2007. Auxiliary selection, "Language and Linguistics Compass" 1: 674-708.
39. MCKOON, G. & MACFARLAND, T. 2000. Externally and internally caused change of state verbs, "Language" 76: 833-858.
40. MCKOON, G. & MACFARLAND, T. 2002. Event templates in the lexical representations of verbs, "Cognitive Psychology" 45: 1-44.
41. MONTRUL, S. 2005. Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: exploring some differences and similarities, "Second Language Research", 21: 199-249.
42. OSHITA, H. 2001. The Unaccusative Trap in second language acquisition, "Studies in Second Language Acquisition" 23: 279-304.
43. OSTERHOUT, L. & HOLCOMB, P. 1992. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly, "Journal of Memory and Language" 31: 785-806.
44. PERLMUTTER, D.M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 157-189.
45. PERLMUTTER, D. 2010. My path in linguistics. In D. GERDTS, J. MOORE & M. POLINSKY (eds.), Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic Explorations in Honor of David M. Perlmutter, 17-37. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. RAMCHAND, G. 2008. Verb Meaning arid the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. RANDALL, J. 2010. Linking: The Geometry of Argument Structure. Berlin: Springer.
48. RANDALL, J., VAN HOUT, A., WEISSENBORN, J. & BAAYEN, H. 2004. Acquiring unaccusativity: a cross-linguistic look. In A. ALEXIADOU, E. ANAGNOSTOPOULOU & M. EVERAERT (eds.), 332-354.
49. RAPPAPORT HOVAV, M. & LEVIN, B. 1998. Building verb meanings. In M. BUTT & W. GEUDER (eds.) The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, 97-134. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
50. ROEHM, D. & SORACE, A. 2008. ERP signatures of auxiliary selection in German. Poster presented at the AMLAP conference, Cambridge.
51. ROEHM, D., BORNKESSEL-SCHLESEWSKY, I. & SORACE, A. (submitted). Processing indeterminate form-to-meaning mappings: Distinct neurophysiological correlates of item-based lexical specifications and individual interpretation strategies.
52. ROHLFS, G. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua Italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Torino: Einaudi.
53. ROMAGNO, D., PAPAGNO, C. & CARAMAZZA, A. 2010. Evidence from neuropsychology on verb features: The case of a patient with Semantic Dementia. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Verbs: the identification and representation of verb features, 333-338.
54. SANKOFF, G. & THIBAULT, P. 1977. L'alternance entre les auxiliaires avoir et etre en francais parle a Montreal, "Langue Francaise" 34: 81-108.
55. SEIBERT, A. 1993. Intransitive constructions in German and the ergative hypothesis, "Working Papers in Linguistics", 14. University ofTrondheim.
56. SHEETRET, E., FRIEDMANN, N. & HADAR, U. 2009. The neural Correlates of linguistic distinctions: unaccusative and unergative verbs, "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience", 22: 2306-2315.
57. SORACE, A. 1993a. Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non- native grammars of Italian, "Second Language Research", 9: 22-47.
58. SORACE, A. 1993b. Unaccusativity and auxiliary choice in non-native grammars of Italian and French: asymmetries and predictable indeterminancy, "Journal of French Language Studies", 3: 71-93.
59. SORACE, A. 1995. Acquiring argument structures in a second language: the unaccusative/unergative distinction. In L. EUBANK, L. SEUNKER & M. SHARWOOD SMITH (eds.) The Current State ofInter language, 153-175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60. SORACE, A. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs, "Language", 76: 859-890.
61. SORACE, A. 2004. Gradience at the lexicon-syntax interface: evidence from auxiliary selection. In A. ALEXIADOU, M. EVERAERT, & E. ANAGNOSTOPOULOU (eds.), The Unaccusativity Puzzle, 243-268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. SORACE, A. 2006. Gradience and optionality in mature and developing grammars. In G. FANSELOW, C. FERY, M. SCHLESEWSKY and R. VOGEL (eds.), Gradience in Grammars: Generative Perspectives, 106-123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. SORACE, A. 2011. Pinning down the concept of'interface in bilingualism, "Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism", 1.
64. SORACE, A., to appear. Gradience in Split Intransitivity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. SORACE, A. & KELLER, F. 2005. Gradience in linguistic data, "Lingua", 115: 1497- 1524.
66. SORACE, A., FERREIRA, F., BARD, E.G., VERNICE, M. & BADINO, L. 2008. Gradient auxiliary selection in Italian: eye movement evidence. Ms., University of Edinburgh and University of Ghent.
67. SORACE, A. & SHOMURA, Y. 2001. Lexical constraints on the acquisition of split intransitivity: evidence from L2 Japanese, "Studies in Second Language Acquisition", 23.2: 247-278.
68. THOMSON, C.K. 2003. Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypothesis, "Journal of Neurolinguistics", 16: 151- 167.
69. TUTTLE, E. 1986. The spread of esse as universal auxiliary in central Italo-Romancc, "Medioevo Romanzo", 11; 229-287.
70. VAN HOUT, A., RANDALL, J. & WEISSENBORN, J. 2003. Acquiring the unergative- unaccusative distinction. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (eds.), The acquisition of Dutch (Publikatie nummer 60), 72-120. Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
71. VAN VALIN, R. 1990. Semantic parameters of split intransitivity, "Language", 66: 221- 260.
72. YANG, C. 2002. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. ZOBL, H. 1989. Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In S. GASS & J. SCHACHTER (eds.) Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, 203-221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.