Assessing intentional binding with the method of constant stimuli

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1176-1185

  Nolden, Sophie ^a,b   Haering, Carola ^a   Kiesel, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action effect interval; Intentional binding; Method of constant stimuli; Time perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTENTIONAL BINDING; MALE; RESEARCH; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; JUDGMENT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865361319     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Buehner M.J., Humphreys G.R. Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science 2009, 20(10):1221-1228.
2. Craig J.C. A constant error in the perception of brief temporal intervals. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 13:99-104.
3. Cravo A.M., Claessens P.M.E., Baldo M.V.C. The relation between action, predictability and temporal contiguity in temporal binding. Acta Psychologica 2011, 136:157-166.
4. Desantis A., Hughes G., Waszak F. Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction. PloS ONE 2012, 7(1):e29557.
5. Engbert K., Wohlschläger A. Intentions and expectations in temporal binding. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16(2):255-264.
6. Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., Haggard P. Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition 2008, 107:693-704.
7. Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., Thomas R., Haggard P. Agency, subjective time, and other minds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(6):1261-1268.
8. Gescheider G.A. Psychophysics: The fundamentals 1997, L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 3rd ed.
9. Getty D.J. Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models. Perception and Psychophysics 1975, 18:1-8.
10. Gibbon J. Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological Review 1977, 84:279-325.
11. Greenwald A.G. A double stimulation test of ideomotor theory with implications for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 84:392-398.
12. Grondin S. From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:22-44.
13. Grondin S. Unequal Weber fractions for the categorization of brief temporal intervals. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2010, 72:1422-1430.
14. Grondin S. Methods for studying psychophysical time. Psychology of time 2008, 51-74. Bingley, Emerald. S. Grondin (Ed.).
15. Grondin S., Killeen P.R. Tracking time with song and count: Different Weber functions for musicians and nonmusicians. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2009, 71:1649-1654. 10.3758/app 71.7.1649.
16. Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (in press). Time in action contexts - Learning when an action effect occurs. Psychological Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0341-8.
17. Haggard Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(6):290-295.
18. Haggard P., Aschersleben G., Gehrke J., Prinz W. Action, binding, and awareness. Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX 2002, 266-285. Oxford University Press, Oxford. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
19. Haggard P., Clark S. Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediciton. Consciousness and Cognition 2003, 12(4):695-707.
20. Haggard P., Clark S., Kalogeras J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(4):382-385.
21. Haggard P., Cole J. Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16(2):211-220.
22. Haggard P., Poonian S., Walsh E. Representing the consequences of intentionally inhibited actions. Brain Research 2009, 1286:106-113.
23. Herbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. Zweiter, analytischer Teil. Königsberg: August Wilhelm Unzer.
24. Hoffmann J., Butz M.V., Herbort O., Kiesel A., Lenhard A. Spekulationen zur Struktur ideo-motorischer Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie 2007, 14:95-103.
25. Humphreys G.R., Buehner M.J. Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(5):1542-1549.
26. Humphreys G.R., Buehner M.J. Temporal binding of action and effect in interval reproduction. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 203(2):465-470.
27. Lapid E., Ulrich R., Rammsayer T. On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: A comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task. Perception and Psychophysics 2008, 70(2):291-305.
28. Libet B., Gleason C.A., Wright E.W., Pearl D.K. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain 1983, 106:623-642.
29. Moore J., Haggard P. Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(1):136-144.
30. Moore J., Lagnado D., Deal D.C., Haggard P. Feelings of control: Contingency determines experience of action. Cognition 2009, 110(2):279-283.
31. Pfister R., Kiesel A., Hoffmann J. Learning at any rate: Action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychological Research 2011, 75(1):61-65.
32. Poulton E.C. Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:777-803.
33. Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide 2002, Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh.
34. Shin Y.K., Proctor R.W., Capaldi E.J. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136(6):943-974.
35. Ulrich R., Nitschke J., Rammsayer T. Crossmodal temporal discrimination: Assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68(7):1140-1152.
36. Wearden J.H., Norton R., Martin S., Montford-Bebb O. Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:716-729.
37. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception and Psychophysics 2001, 63(8):1293-1313.
38. Wohlschläger A., Engbert K., Haggard P. Intentionality as a constituting condition for the own self- and other selves. Consciousness and Cognition 2003, 12(4):708-716.
39. Wohlschläger A., Haggard P., Gesierich B., Prinz W. The perceived onset time of self- and other-generated actions. Psychological Science 2003, 14(6):586-591.
40. Wundt W. Grundzüge de physiologischen Psychologie 1887, Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. 3rd ed.