The genetics of environmental variation of dry matter grain yield in maize

Genetics Research

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 113-119

  Yang, Ye ^a   Schön, Chris Carolin ^b   Sorensen, Daniel ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GRAIN; HARVEST; HYBRIDIZATION; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENETICS;

BAYES THEOREM; CEREALS; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84865348856     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: 14695073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672312000304     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ansel, J., Bottin, H., Rodriguez-Beltran, C., Damon, C., Nagarajan, M., Fehrmann, S., Franç ois, J. & Yvert, G. (2008). Cell-to-cell stochastic variation in gene expression is a complex genetic trait. PLoS Genetics 4. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000049.
2. Bartlett, M. S. (1937). Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society, A 160, 268-282.
3. Box, G. E. P. & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 26, 211-252.
4. Cotes, J. M., Crossa, J., Sanches, A. & Cornelius, P. L. (2006). A Bayesian approach for assessing the stability of genotypes. Crop Science 46, 2654-2665.
5. Edwards, J. W. & Jannink, J. L. (2006). Bayesian modeling of heterogeneous error and genotyperenvironment interaction variances. Crop Science 2006, 820-833.
6. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman.
7. Gelfand, A. E. (1996). Model determination using sampling-based methods. In Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (ed. W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson & D. J. Spiegelhalter), pp. 145-161. London: Chapman and Hall.
8. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
9. Hill, W. G. & Mulder, H. A. (2010). Genetic analysis of environmental variation. Genetics Research 92, 381-395.
10. Hozo, S. P., Djulbegovic, B. & Hozo, I. (2005). Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology 5. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13.
11. Jinks, J. L. & Pooni, H. S. (1988). The genetic basis of environmental sensitivity. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. North Carolina State University, NC, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 505-522.
12. Mackay, T. F. C. & Lyman, R. F. (2005). Drosophila bristles and the nature of quantitative genetic variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 360, 1513-1527.
13. Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A. & Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Ordas, B., Malvar, R. A. & Hill, W. G. (2008). Genetic variation and quantitative trait loci associated developmental stability and the environmental correlation between traits in maize. Genetical Research 90, 385-395.
15. Piepho, H. P. (1999). Stability analysis using the SAS system. Agronomy Journal 91, 154-160.
16. Sorensen, D. & Waagepetersen, R. (2003). Normal linear models with genetically structured residual variance heterogeneity: a case study. Genetical Research 82, 207-222.
17. Yang, Y., Christensen, O. F. & Sorensen, D. (2011). Analysis of a genetically structured variance heterogeneity model using the Box-Cox transformation. Genetics Research 93, 33-46.
18. Zhang, X. S. & Hill, W. G. (2005). Evolution of the environmental component of phenotypic variance: Stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity. Evolution 59, 1237-1244.