A Bayesian approach for assessing the stability of genotypes

Crop Science

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 2654-2665

  Cotes, José Miguel ^a   Crossa, José ^b   Sanches, Adhemar ^c   Cornelius, Paul L ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^c SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33845654909     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0227     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Besag, J., and D. Higdon. 1999. Bayesian analysis of agricultural field experiments. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Methodological 61:691-746.
2. Box, G.E.P., and G.C. Tiao. 1973. Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Wiley Classic Library, New York.
3. Crossa, J. 1990. Statistical analyses of multilocation trials. Adv. Agron. 44:55-8:5.
4. DeLacy, I.H., M. Cooper, and K.E. Basford. 1996. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotype-by-environment interactions and evaluation of their impact on response to selection, p. 51-84. In M.S. Kang and H. G. Gauch (ed.). Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, New York.
5. Eberhart, S.A., and W.A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
6. Edwards, J.W., and J.-L. Jannink. 2006. Bayesian modeling of heterogeneous error and genotype × environment interaction variances. Crop Sci. 46:820-833.
7. Foucteau, V., and J.-B. Denis. 2001. Statistical analysis of successive experiments in plant breeding: A Bayesian approach. p. 49-56. In A. Gallais et al. (ed.). EUCARPIA quantitative genetics and breeding methods: The way ahead. INRA Editions, Paris.
8. Geman, S., and D. Geman. 1984. Stochastic relaxation. Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6:721-741.
9. Gelman, A., J.B. Carlin, H.S. Stern, and D.B. Rubin. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. 4th ed. Chapman & Hall, London.
10. Hobert, J.P., and G. Casella. 1996. The effect of improper priors on Gibbs Sampling in hierarchical linear mixed models. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 91:1461-1473.
11. Kang, M.S. 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res. Comm. 16:113-115.
12. Kang, M.S. 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agron. J. 85:754-757.
13. Kang, M.S., and R. Magari. 1996. New development in selecting for phenotypic stability in crop breeding. p. 1-14. In M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch (ed.). Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, New York.
14. Magari, R., and M.S. Kang. 1997. SAS STABLE: Stability analyses of balanced an unbalanced data. Agron. J. 89:929-932.
15. Picpho, H.P. 1999. Stability analysis using the SAS system. Agron. J. 91:154-160.
16. SAS Institute Inc. 1999a. SAS/STAT. User's Guide. Version 8. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
17. SAS Institute Inc. 1999b. SAS/IML User's Guide. Version 8. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
18. Shukla, G.K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environment components of variability. Heredity 29:237-245.
19. Theobald, C.M., M. Talbot, and F. Nabugoomu. 2002. A Bayesian approach to regional and local-area prediction from crop variety trials. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Statist. 7(3):403-419.
20. Viele, K., and C. Srinivasan. 1999. Parsimonious Estimation of Multiplicative Interaction in Analysis of Variance using Kullback-Leibler Information, Technical Report 362. Department of Statistics. University of Kentucky (revised July 1999).
21. Wang, C.S., J.J. Rutledge, and D. Gianola. 1993. Marginal inference about variance components in a mixed linear model using Gibbs sampling. Genet. Sci. Evol. 25:41-62.