Deviated nasal septum hinders intranasal sprays: A computer simulation study

Rhinology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 311-318

  Frank, Dennis O ^a   Kimbell, Julia S ^a   Cannon, Daniel ^b   Pawar, Sachin S ^b   Rhee, John S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Inspiratory airflow; Intranasal spray; Particle deposition; Septal deviation

Indexed keywords

NOSE SPRAY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY POSTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDRODYNAMICS; INHALATION; INTRANASAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; NOSE SEPTUM; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRANASAL; ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDRODYNAMICS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INHALATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NASAL OBSTRUCTION; NASAL SEPTUM; NASAL SPRAYS; POSTURE;

EID: 84865336992     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4193/rhin12.053     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Illum L. Nasal drug delivery: new develop1.-ments and strategies. Drug Discovery Today 2002; 7:1184-1189.
2. Kimbell JS, Segal RA, Asgharian Bet al. Characterization of deposition from nasal spray devices using a computational fluid dynamics model of the human nasal passages. J Aerosol Med 2007; 20:59-74.
3. Frank DO, Kimbell JS, Pawar S, Rhee JS. Effects of Anatomy and Particle Size on Nasal Sprays and Nebulizers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Nov 2. [Epub ahead of print].
4. Suman JD, Laube BL, Dalby R. Comparison of nasal deposition and clearance of aerosol generated by nebulizer and an aqueous spray pump. Pharmaceutical Res. 1999; 16: 1648-1652.
5. Djupes land PG, Sk ret t ing A. Nasal Deposition and Clearance in Man: Comparison of a Bidirectional Powder Device and a Traditional Liquid Spray Pump. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012. Jan 17. [Epub ahead of print].
6. Foo MY, Cheng Y-S, Su W-C, Donovan MD. The influence of spray properties on intranasal deposition. J Aerosol Med 2007; 20: 495-508.
7. Merkus P, Ebbens FA, Muller B, Fokkens WJ. Influence of anatomy and head position on intranasal drug deposition. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 263: 827-832.
8. Blaiss MS, Benninger MS, Fronmer L, et al. Expanding choices in intranasal steroid therapy: Summary of a roundtable meeting. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2006; 27: 254-264.
9. Scheibe M, Bethge C, Witt M, Hummel T. Intranasal administration of drugs. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 134: 643-646.
10. Cheng YS, Holmes TD, Gao J et al. Characterization of nasal spray pumps and deposition pattern in a replica of the human nasal airway. J Aerosol Med. 2001; 14: 267-280.
11. Bateman ND, Whymark AD, Clifton NJ, Woolford TJ. A study of intranasal distribution of azelastine hydrochloride aqueous nasal spray with different spray techniques. Clin Otolaryngol. 2002; 27: 327-330.
12. Kesavan J, Bascom R, Laube B, Swift DL. The relationship between particle deposition in the anterior nasal passage and nasal passage characteristics. J Aerosol Med. 2000; 13: 17-23.
13. Schroeter JD, Kimbell JS, Asgharian B. Analysis of particle deposition in the turbinate and olfactory regions using a human nasal computational fluid dynamics model. J Aerosol Med. 2006; 19: 301-313.
14. Garcia GJ, Rhee JS, Senior BA, Kimbell JS. Septal deviation and nasal resistance: an investigation using virtual surgery and computational fluid dynamics. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010; 24: e46-53.
15. Garcia GJ, Tewksbury EW, Wong BA, Kimbell JS. Interindividual variability in nasal filtration as a function of nasal cavity geometry. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2009; 22: 139-155.
16. Garcia GJM, Bailie N, Martins DA, Kimbell JS. Atrophic rhinitis: A CFD study of air conditioning in the nasal cavity. J Appl Physiol. 2007; 103: 1082-1092.
17. Garcia GJM, Mitchell G, Bailie N, Thornhill D, Watterson J, Kimbell JS. Visualization of nasal airflow patterns in a patient affected with atrophic rhinitis using particle image velocimetry. J Physics: Conference Series 2007; 85: 012032.
18. Garcia GJM, Rhee JS, Senior BA, Kimbell JS. Septal deviation and nasal resistance: An investigation using virtual surgery and computational fluid dynamics. Am J Rhinol Allerg 2009; 24: e46-53.
19. Garcia GJM, Schroeter JD, Segal RA, Stanek J, Foureman GL, Kimbell JS. Dosimetry of nasal uptake of water-soluble and reactive gases: A first study of interhuman variability. Inhal Toxicol. 2009; 21: 607-618.
20. Kimbell JS, Garcia GJ, Frank DO, Cannon DE, Pawar S, Rhee JS. Computed nasal resistance compared with patient-reported symptoms in surgically treated nasal airway passages: A Preliminary Report. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012; 26: 94-98.
21. Pawar SS, Garcia GJ, Kimbell JS, Rhee JS. Objective measures in aesthetic and functional nasal surgery: perspectives on nasal form and function. Facial Plast Surg. 2010; 26: 320-327.
22. Rhee JS, Pawar SS, Garcia GJ, Kimbell JS. Toward personalized nasal surgery using computational fluid dynamics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011; 13: 305-310.
23. Schroeter JD, Garcia GJ, Kimbell JS. Effects of Surface Smoothness on Inertial Particle Deposition in Human Nasal Models. J Aerosol Sci. 2011; 42: 52-63.
24. Shanley KT, Zamankhan P, Ahmadi G, Hopke PK, Cheng YS. Numerical simulations investigating the regional and overall deposition efficiency of the human nasal cavity. Inhalation Toxicol. 2008; 20: 1093-1100.
25. Garlapati RR, Lee HP, Chong FH, Wang DY. Indicators for the correct usage of intranasal medications: A computational fluid dynamics study. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 1975-1982.
26. Chen XB, Lee HP, Chong VF, Wang de Y. A computational fluid dynamics model for drug delivery in a nasal cavity with inferior turbinate hypertrophy. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010; 23: 329-338.
27. Chen XB, Lee HP, Chong VF, Wang DY. Numerical simulation of the effects of inferior turbinate surgery on nasal airway heating capacity. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010; 24: e118-122.
28. Leong SC, Chen XB, Lee HP, Wang DY. A review of the implications of computational fluid dynamic studies on nasal airflow and physiology. Rhinology. 2010; 48: 139-145.
29. Wang SM, Inthavong K, Wen J, Tu JY, Xue CL. Comparison of micron-and nanoparticle deposition patterns in a realistic human nasal cavity. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009; 166:142-151.
30. Inthavong K, Ge Q, Se CMK, Yang W, Tu JY. Simulation of sprayed particle deposition in a human nasal cavity including a nasal spray device. J Aerosol Sci. 2011; 42: 100-113.
31. Inthavong K, Tian ZF, Li HFet al. A numerical study of spray particle deposition in a human nasal cavity. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2006; 40: 1034-1045.
32. Inthavong K, Tian ZF, Tu JY, Yang W, Xue C. Optimising nasal spray parameters for efficient drug delivery using computational fluid dynamics. Comp Biol Med. 2008; 38: 713-726.
33. Benninger MS, Hadley JA, Osguthorpe JDet al. Techniques of intranasal steroid use. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130: 5-24.
34. Rhee JS, Pawar SS, Garcia GJ, Kimbell JS. Toward Personalized Nasal Surgery Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011; 13: 305-310.
35. Beals JA, Funk LM, Fountain R, Sedman R. Quantifying the distribution of inhalation exposure in human populations: distribution of minute volumes in adults and children. Environ Health Perspect. 1996; 104: 974-979.
36. Suman JD, Laube BL, Lin TC, Brouet G, Dalby R. Validity of in vitro tests on aqueous spray pumps as surrogates for nasal deposition. Pharmaceut Res. 2002; 19: 1-6.
37. Hallworth GW, Padfield JM. A comparison of the regional deposition in a model nose of a drug discharged from metered aerosol and metered-pump nasal delivery systems. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986; 77: 348-353.
38. Aggarwal R, Cardozo A, Homer JJ. The assessment of topical nasal drug distribution. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004; 29: 201-205.
39. Kleven M, Melaaen MC, Reimers M, Rotnes JS, Aurdal L, Djupesland PG. Using computational fluid dynamics (cfd) to improve the bi-directional nasal drug delivery concept. Food Bioproducts Processing 2005; 83: 107-117.