Sustainability impact assessment of increasing resource use intensity in forest bioenergy production chains

GCB Bioenergy

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 91-106

  Werhahn Mees, Wendelin ^a   Palosuo, Taru ^a   Garcia Gonzalo, Jordi ^a,b   Röser, Dominik ^c   Lindner, Marcus ^a  

^a EUROPEAN FOREST INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^c FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bioenergy production chain; Harvesting residues; Pellets; Sustainability impact assessment; Whole tree harvesting; Wood chip

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CHAINS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EXTRACTION; FORESTRY; GREENHOUSE GASES; HARVESTING; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; ORE PELLETS; PELLETIZING; WOOD PRODUCTS;

BIOENERGY PRODUCTIONS; ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY RATIO; FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; GREENHOUSE GAS BALANCE; SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT; WHOLE TREE HARVESTING; WOOD CHIP;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84865299785     PISSN: 17571693     EISSN: 17571707     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01068.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ahonen A (2004) The socio-economic effects of the use of forest chips from logging residues and small-sized trees in energy production, case-study. Research and Development Centre of Kajaani, Working Papers 47.
2. Alakangas E, Heikkinen A, Lensu T, Vesterinen P (2007) Biomass fuel trade in Europe. Summary Report VTTR0350807, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.
3. Börjesson P, Gustavsson L (1996) Biomass transportation. Renewable Energy, 9, 1033-1036.
4. Bosch J, Johnson FX, Mertens R, Roubanis N, Loesoenen P, Gikas A, Görten J (2007) Panorama of energy. Energy statistics to support EU policies and solutions. In: Eurostat Statistical Books. (eds Bosch J, Mertens R), pp. 1-178. Eurostat, European Communities, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
5. Chum Hl, Overend RP (2001) Biomass and renewable fuels. Fuel Processing Technology, 71, 187-195.
6. Cowie Al, David Gardner W (2007) Competition for the biomass resource: greenhouse impacts and implications for renewable energy incentive schemes. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 601-607.
7. Davis LS, Johnson KN, Davis KP (1987) Forest Management. McGraw-Hill, New York.
8. Dove WT, Boustead I (1998) The effect of sulphur on primary zinc eco profile calculations. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ecobalance, pp. 413-416.
9. European Commission (1997) Energy for the future: Renewable sources of energy. White Paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan. COM(97)599 final, Brussels.
10. European Commission (2005) Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC (2005) 791, Brussels.
11. European Commission (2007) Renewable energy road map. Renewable energies in the 21st century: building a more sustainable future. COM (2006) 848 final, Brussels.
12. European Environment Agency (2007) Environmentally Compatible Bio-Energy Potential from European Forests. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
13. Eggers J, Tröltzsch K, Falcucci A et al. (2009) Is biofuel policy harming biodiversity in Europe? GCB Bioenergy, 1, 18-34.
14. Egnell G, Valinger E (2003) Survival, growth, and growth allocation of planted Scots pine trees after different levels of biomass removal in clear-felling. Forest Ecology and Management, 177, 65-74.
15. Ewert F, Van Ittersum MK, Bezlepkina I et al. (2009) A methodology for enhanced flexibility of integrated assessment in agriculture. Environmental science & policy, 12, 546-561.
16. Faaij AP (2006) Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices. Energy Policy, 34, 322-342.
17. Hakkila P (1989) Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
18. Hakkila P (2003) Developing technology for large scale production of forest chips: Wood energy technology programme 1999-2003. Interim Report, Technology Programme Report 5/2003, Tekes.
19. Hakkila P (2006) Factors driving the development of forest energy in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 281-288.
20. Hall DO, Scrase JI (1998) Will biomass be the environmentally friendly fuel of the future? Biomass and Bioenergy, 15, 357-367.
21. Hall JP (2001) Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 67, 109-119.
22. Hawkings W (2009) Forest biomass and wood pellet price indications. Forest Energy Monitor, 1, 1-23.
23. Heikkilä J, Laitila J, Tanttu V, Lindblad J, Sirén M, Asikainen A (2006) Harvesting alternatives and cost factors of delimbed energy wood. Forestry Studies, 45, 49-56.
24. Heikkilä J, Sirén M, Äijälä O (2007) Management alternatives of energy wood thinning stands. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 255-266.
25. Heinimö J, Alakangas E (2006) Solid and Liquid Biofuels Markets in Finland - A Study on International Biofuels Trade. Lappeenranta University of Technology and VTT, Lappeenranta.
26. Howell CI, Wilson AD, Davey SM, Eddington MM (2008) Sustainable forest management reporting in Australia. Ecological Indicators, 8, 123-130.
27. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC Publications, Kanagawa, Japan.
28. Joelsson A, Gustavsson L (2008) District heating and energy efficiency in detached houses of differing size and construction. Applied Energy, 86, 126-134.
29. Kangas J, Kangas A (2005) Multiple criteria decision support in forest management-the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained. Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 133-143.
30. Karltun E, Saarsalmi A, Ingerslev M et al. (2008) Wood ash recycling possibilities and risks. In: Sustainable Use of Forest Biomass for Energy. A Synthesis with Focus on the Baltic and Nordic Region (eds Röser D, Asikainen A, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Stupak I), pp. 79-108. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
31. Laitila J (2006) Cost and sensitive analysis tools for forest energy procurement chains. Forestry Studies, 45, 5-10.
32. Laitila J, Ranta T, Asikainen A (2008) Productivity of Stump Harvesting for Fuel. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 19, 37-47.
33. Lindner M, Suominen T, Palosuo T, Garcia-Gonzales J, Verweij P, Zudin S, Päivinen R (in press) ToSIA - a tool for sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood-chains. Ecological Modelling, doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.006 (Accessed 5 October 2009).
34. Marland G, Schlamadinger B (1995) Biomass fuels and forest-management strategies: how do we calculate the greenhouse-gas emissions benefits? Energy, 20, 1131-1140.
35. Nas TF (1996) Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Application. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
36. Nurmi J (1999) The storage of logging residue for fuel. Biomass and Bioenergy, 17, 41-47.
37. Päivinen R, Lindner M, Rosén K, Lexer MJ (in press) A concept for assessing sustainability impacts of forestry-wood chains. European Journal of Forest Research.
38. Palander T, Vesa L, Tokola T, Pihlaja P, Ovaskainen H (2009) Modelling the stump biomass of stands for energy production using a harvester data management system. Biosystems Engineering, 102, 69-74.
39. Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Mikhailov A, Komarov A, Faubert P, Thuerig E, Lindner M (2008) Projecting effects of intensified biomass extraction with alternative modelling approaches. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1423-1433.
40. Palosuo T, Suominen T, Werhahn-Mees W, Lindner M (in press) Assigning results of the tool for sustainability impact assessment (ToSIA) to products of a forest-wood-chain. Ecological Modelling, doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.020 (Accessed 21 April 2010).
41. Powers RF, Scott DA, Sanchez FG, Voldseth RA, Page-Dumroese D, Elioff JD, Stone DM (2005) The North American long-term soil productivity experiment: findings from the first decade of research. Forest Ecology and Management, 220, 31-50.
42. Rametsteiner E, Berg S, Laurijssen J et al. (2008) EFORWOOD Project Deliverable 1.1.6: Revised FWC-Sustainability Indicator Set Document. BOKU, Vienna.
43. Raulund-Rasmussen K, Stupak I, Clarke N, Callesen I, Helmisaari H-S, Karltun E, Varnagiryte-Kabasinskiene I (2008) Effects of very intensive forest biomass harvesting on short and long term site productivity. In: Sustainable Use of Forest Biomass for Energy. A synthesis with Focus on the Baltic and Nordic Region (eds Röser D, Asikainen A, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Stupak I), pp. 29-78. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
44. Richardson J (2006) Sustainable production systems for bioenergy: impacts on forest resources and utilization of wood for energy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 279-280.
45. Rogner H-H, Zhou D, Bradley R et al. (2007) Introduction. In: Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Metz B, Davidson Or, Bosch Pr, Dave R, Meyer La), pp. 95-116. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
46. Röser D, Pasanen K, Asikainen A (2006) Decision-support program "EnerTree" for analyzing forest residue recovery options. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 326-333.
47. Samuelsson H (2002) Recommendations for the extractions of forest fuel and compensation fertilising. National Board of Forestry (Skogsstyrelsen), Meddelande, 3-2002, 1-29.
48. Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2006) Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 47, 332-355.
49. Sheehan JJ (2009) Biofuels and the conundrum of sustainability. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 20, 318-324.
50. Stupak I, Asikainen A, Jonsell M et al. (2007) Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy - possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 666-684.
51. Sverdrup H, Rosen K (1998) Long-term base cation mass balances for Swedish forests and the concept of sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management, 110, 221-236.
52. Thek G, Obernberg I (2004) Wood pellet production costs under Austrian and in comparison to Swedish framework conditions. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27, 671-693.
53. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA et al. (2009) Beneficial Biofuels - The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma. Science, 325, 270-271.
54. Trømborg E, Bolkesjø TF, Solberg B (2008) Biomass market and trade in Norway: status and future prospects. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 660-671.
55. Tscherning K, König B, Schößer B, Helming K, Sieber S (2008) Ex-ante impact assessments (IA) in the European commission - an overview. In: Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes (eds Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P), pp. 17-33. Springer, Berlin.
56. Verkerk PJ, Lindner M, Zanchi G, Zudin S (2009) Assessing impacts of intensified biomass removal on deadwood in European forests. Ecological Indicators, doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.004 (Accessed 4 June 2009).
57. Wihersaari M (2005a) Evaluation of greenhouse gas emission risks from storage of wood residue. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28, 444-453.
58. Wihersaari M (2005b) Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28, 435-443.