Minimal invasive cardiac output monitoring: Get the dose of fluid right

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 109, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 299-302

  Bouwman, R A ^a   Boer, C ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFUSION FLUID;

COLORECTAL SURGERY; CRYSTALLOID; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUID THERAPY; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPERVOLEMIA; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MORBIDITY; ORGAN PERFUSION; OXYGEN DELIVERY DEVICE; OXYGEN THERAPY; PATIENT CARE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL MORTALITY; THERMODILUTION; TISSUE PERFUSION; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

EID: 84865273720     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes277     Document Type: Editorial

References (25)

1. Hadian M, Pinsky MR. Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications. Crit Care 2006; 10 (Suppl. 3): S8
2. Schwann NM, Hillel Z, Hoeft A, et al. Lack of effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 994-1002
3. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: csomparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 641-8
4. Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Conzen P, Rehm M. a rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 723-40
5. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and highrisk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 1392-402
6. Michard F. The burden of high-risk surgery and the potential benefit of goal-directed strategies. Crit Care 2011; 15: 447
7. de Waal EEC, Wappler F, Buhre WF. Cardiac output monitoring. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22: 71-7
8. Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 340-53
9. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1180-92
10. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1220-35
11. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Singer M, Chiche JD. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1801-8
12. Challand C, Struthers R, Sneyd JR, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 53-62
13. NICE. CardioQ-ODM oesophageal Doppler monitor. 2011. Available from
14. Corcoran T, Emma Joy Rhodes J, Clarke S, Myles PS, Ho KM. Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 640-51
15. Kiefer N, Theis J, Putensen-Himmer G, Hoeft A, Zenker S. Peristaltic pneumatic compression of the legs reduces fluid demand and improves hemodynamic stability during surgery: a randomized, prospective study. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 536-44
16. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-7
17. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a 'gray zone' approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 231-41
18. Metzelder S, Coburn M, Fries M, et al. Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 776-84
19. Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 395-401
20. De Hert SG. Assessment of fluid responsiveness: insights in a 'gray zone'. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 229-30
21. Gelman S. Venous function and central venous pressure: a physiologic story. Anesthesiology 2008; 108: 735-48
22. Jansen JR, Maas JJ, Pinsky MR. Bedside assessment of mean systemic filling pressure. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16: 231-6
23. Maas JJ, Geerts BF, van den Berg PC, Pinsky MR, Jansen JR. Assessment of venous return curve and mean systemic filling pressure in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 912-8
24. Geerts BF, Aarts LP, Groeneveld AB, Jansen JR. Predicting cardiac output responses to passive leg raising by a PEEP-induced increase in central venous pressure, in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 150-6
25. Chikhani M, Moppett IK. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring: what evidence do we need. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 451-3