Principals as Middle Managers: School Leadership During the Implementation of Primary Class Size Reduction Policy in Ontario

Leadership and Policy in Schools

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 325-343

  Flessa, Joseph J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865264677     PISSN: 15700763     EISSN: 17445043     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15700763.2012.692429     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adadmowski, S., Therriault, S. B. and Cavanna, A. 2007. The autonomy gap: Barriers to effective school leadership, Dayton, OH: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
2. Anderson, S. and Ben Jaafar, S. 2006. Policy trends in Ontario education: 1996-2006, Toronto, Canada: International Centre for Educational Change, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
3. Beck, L. and Murphy, J. 1993. Understanding the principalship: Metaphorical themes, 1920s-1990s, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4. Ben Jaafar, S. and Anderson, S. 2007. Policy trends and tensions in accountability for educational management and services in Canada. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(2): 207-227.
5. Bryk, A., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S. and Easton, J. Q. 2010. Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Burch, P., Theoharis, G. and Rauscher, E. 2010. Class size reduction in practice: Investigating the influence of the elementary school principal. Educational Policy, 24(2): 330-358.
7. Canadian Education Association. 2010. Ontario's primary class size reduction initiative: Report on early implementation, Toronto, Canada: Canadian Education Association.
8. Carter, S. 1999. No excuses: Seven principals of low-income schools who set the standard for high achievement, Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
9. Chenoweth, K. 2009. It can be done, it's being done, and here's how. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(1): 38-43.
10. Cuban, L. 1998. How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3): 453-477.
11. Cuban, L. 2004. "A solution that lost its problem: Centralized policymaking and classroom gains". In Who's in charge here? The tangled web of school governance and policy, Edited by: Epstein, N. 104-130. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
12. Cubberley, E. 1923. The principal and his school: The organization, administration, and supervision of instruction in an elementary school, Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin Company.
13. Edmonds, R. 1979. Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational leadership, 37(1): 15-24.
14. Evans, R. 1996. The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Flessa, J. 2009. Educational micropolitics and distributed leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 84: 331-349.
16. Flessa, J. and Gregoire, H. 2011. "Policy aspirations and dilemmas of implementation: Leadership for partnerships in Ontario, Canada". In School leadership for authentic family and community partnerships: Research perspectives for transforming practice, Edited by: Auerbach, S. 117-132. New York, NY: Routledge.
17. Fuller, B. 2003. Education policy under cultural pluralism. Educational Researcher, 32(9): 15-24.
18. Fuller, B. and Clarke, P. 1994. Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1): 119-157.
19. Institute for Educational Leadership. 2000. "Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship". In School leadership for the 21st century initiative: A report of the task force on the principalship, Washington, DC: Author.
20. Kirp, D. and Driver, C. 1995. The aspirations of systemic reform meet the realities of localism. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(3): 589-612.
21. Leader, G. and Stern, A. 2008. Real leaders, real schools: Stories of success against enormous odds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22. Leithwood, K., Harris, A. and Hopkins, D. 2008. Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School leadership and management, 28(1): 27-42.
23. Levin, B. 2008. How to change 5000 schools: A practical approach for leading change at every level, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
24. Levin, B. 2010. Governments and education reform: Some lessons from the last 50 years. Journal of Education Policy, 25(6): 739-747.
25. McDougall, D., Gaskell, J., Flessa, J., Kugler, J., Jang, E., Herbert, M., Fantilli, R. (2006). Improving student achievement in schools facing challenging circumstances: Final report prepared for the Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat. http://www.curriculum.org/secretariat/files/Sept28Summary.pdf (http://www.curriculum.org/secretariat/files/Sept28Summary.pdf)
26. McLaughlin, M. 1987. Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2): 171-178.
27. Rowan, B. 1990. Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. Review of Research in Education, 16: 253-289.
28. Southern Regional Education Board. 2007. Schools need good leaders now: State progress in creating a learning-centered school leadership system, Atlanta, GA: Author.
29. Stone, D. 2002. Policy paradox: The art of political decision making, Revised, New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
30. Vitaska, S. 2008. Strong leaders, strong schools: 2007 state laws, Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures.
31. Weick, K. 1976. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 1-19.
32. Whitman, D. 2008. Sweating the small stuff: Inner-city schools and the new paternalism, Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
33. Wolcott, H. 1973. The man in the principal's office: An ethnography, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.