Routine peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding

Cooperation and Conflict

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 287-308

  Ginty, Roger Mac ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bureaucracy; peacebuilding; statebuilding; technocratic

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865241437     PISSN: 00108367     EISSN: 14603691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010836712444825     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Abbinett RMarxism After Modernity: Politics, Technology and Social Transformation. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2006:.
2. Amir S.Symbolic power in a technocratic regime: The reign of BJ Habibie in New Order Indonesia.Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia. 2007;22 (1): 83-106.
3. Anderson MBDo No Harm: How Aid Can Support Peace. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 1999:.
4. Annan KIn Larger Freedom: Towards Security, Development and Human Rights for All. Report of the Secretary General. New York: United Nations; 2005:.
5. Strategy 2020: The Long-term Strategic Framework of the Asian Development Bank, 2008-2020. Manila: Asian Development Bank; 2008:.
6. Beckfield J.The social structure of the world polity.American Journal of Sociology. 2010;115 (4): 1018-1068.
7. Bhabha HK.Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse.October. 1984;28:125-133.
8. Bleiker R,Hutchison E.Fear no more: Emotions and world politics.Review of International Studies. 2008;34 (1): 115-135.
9. Boli J,Thomas G.World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organizations.American Sociological Review. 1997;62 (2): 171-190.
10. Boli J,Thomas GConstructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Boli JThomas G, ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1999:1-12.
11. Box R.Running government like a business: Implications for public administration theory and practice.American Review of Public Administration. 1999;29 (1): 19-43.
12. Bryld E.The technocratic discourse: Technical means to political problems.Development in Practice. 2000;10 (5): 700-705.
13. Building States to Build Peace. Call CWyeth V, ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2008:.
14. Carey HFPrivatizing the Democratic Peace: Policy Dilemmas of NGO Peacebuilding. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2012:.
15. Peacebuilding: A Caritas Training Manual. Vatican City: Caritas Internationalis; 2002:.
16. Carment D.Assessing state failure: Implications for theory and policy.Third World Quarterly. 2003;24 (3): 407-427.
17. CaustonJ (2009) The challenge of mainstreaming conflict sensitivity: PCIA methodologies and the organizational culture of NGOs. ATLIS Journal, 5, no pagination. Accessed at: http://atlismta.org/online-journals/0809-journal-intervention/.
18. Centeno MA.The new leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy.Theory and Society. 1993;22 (3): 307-335.
19. Centeno MADemocracy Within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press; 1994:.
20. Chandler DEmpire in Denial: The Politics of Statebuilding. London: Pluto; 2006:.
21. CIDA (2005) Technical Assistance Handbook. Accessed at: http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/acdi-cida/acdi-cida.nsf/eng/REN-218124456-NVX.
22. Conflict Sensitivity Consortium (2009) Conflict Sensitivity Consortium Benchmarking Paper. Draft, 29April. Accessed at: http://www.conflictsensitivity.org/sites/default/files/CSA%20Benchmarking%20paper-full.pdf.
23. Conflict Sensitivity Consortium (2010) Conflict Sensitive Approaches to Development, Humanitarian Assistance and Peacebuilding, Resource Pack.
24. Corrales J.Technocratic Policy Making and Parliamentary Accountability in Argentina, 1983-2002.UNRISD Democracy, Governance and Human Rights Paper. 2004;:13.
25. Cox R.Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory.Millennium. 1981;10 (2): 126-155.
26. Daday J,Burris B.Technocratic teamwork: Mitigating polarization and cultural marginalization in an engineering firm.Transformation of Work. 2001;10:241-261.
27. del Castillo GRebuilding War Torn States: The Challenge of Post-Conflict Economic Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:.
28. DempseyJCoburnC (2010) Traditional Dispute Resolution and Stability in Afghanistan. USIP Peace Brief 10, Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace. Accessed at: http://www.usip.org/files/resources/PB%2010%20Traditional%20Dispute%20Resolution%20and%20Stability%20in%20Afghanistan.pdf.
29. Donais T.Empowerment or imposition? Dilemmas of local ownership on post-conflict peacebuilding processes.Peace and Change. 2009;34 (1): 3-26.
30. Theories of Social Change and Their Contribution to the Practice of Conflict Transformation. Seminar Report, Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management; 2005; 2005.
31. ECHO (2011) Background and Mandate. European Commission website. Accessed at: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/about/what/history_en.htm.
32. Strategic Plan 2009-2014: Delivering Impact through Social Science. Swindon: ESRC; 2009:.
33. ESRC (2011a) What we do. Accessed 1 August 2011at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/about-esrc/what-we-do/mission-strategy-priorities/index.aspx.
34. ESRC (2001b) ESRC-DFID Joint Scheme for Research on International Development. Accessed 1 August 2011at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding-and-guidance/funding-opportunities/international-funding/esrc-dfid/DFID-phase2-call3.aspx.
35. Evans B.The Zapatista insurgency: Bringing the political back into conflict analysis.New Political Science. 2008;30 (4): 497-520.
36. Flacks RConformity, Resistance, and Self-Determination: The Individual and Authority. Flacks R, ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1973:3-18.
37. FordeloneT (2009) Triangular Cooperation and Aid Effectiveness. Paper presented at the OECD/DAC Policy Dialogue on Development Co-operation, Mexico City, 28-29 September. Accessed at: http://www.comunidadesegura.org.br/files/Triangular_Cooperation_Aid_Effectiveness_11_DEC_09%5B1%5D.pdf.
38. Furlong GTThe Conflict Resolution Toolbox: Models and Maps for Analysing, Diagnosing and Resolving Conflict. Ontario: Wiley; 2005:.
39. Violent Geographies: Fear, Terror and Political Violence. Gregory DPred A, ed. London. Routledge:; 2007:.
40. GSDRC (2009) Topic Guide on Conflict. Birmingham: Governance and Social Development Resource Centre. Accessed at: http://www.gsdrc.org/index.cfm?objectid=312C4DE5-14C2-620A-276426B564F1233E.
41. William Hague begins Somalia visit.Guardian, The. 2012;:.
42. Hagmaan T,Hoehne M.The failures of the state failure debate: Evidence from the Somali territories.Journal of International Development. 2009;21 (1): 42-57.
43. Hamieh CS,Mac Ginty R.A very political reconstruction: Governance and reconstruction in Lebanon after the 2006 war.Disasters: The Journal of Disaster Studies, Policy and Management. 2009;34 (S1): 103-123.
44. Harbom L,Wallensteen P.Armed conflict, 1989-2006.Journal of Peace Research. 2007;44 (5): 623-634.
45. Harvey DThe New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
46. HeadS (2011) The grim threat to Britain's universities. New York Review of Books (13January). Accessed at:http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jan/13/grim-threat-british-universities/.
47. Hehir A.The myth of the failed state and the war on terror: A challenge to the conventional wisdom.Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 2007;1 (3): 307-332.
48. Held DGlobalization Theory: Approaches and Controversies. Held DMcGrew AG, ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2007:240-255.
49. Hood C,Lodge M.Competence, bureaucracy and public management reform: A comparative analysis.Governance. 2004;17 (3): 313-333.
50. International Monetary Fund (2001) Policy Statement on IMF Technical Assistance. IMF website. Accessed at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/psta/index.htm#1.
51. International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding (2011) A new deal for engagement with fragile states. Accessed at: http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3746,en_21571361_43407692_49151766_1_1_1_1,00.html.
52. KapplerS (2012) Mysterious in content: The European Union peacebuilding framework and local spaces of agency in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Unpublished PhD thesis submitted to the University of St Andrews.
53. Lederach JPPreparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press; 1995:.
54. A Handbook of International Peacebuilding: Into the Eye of the Storm. Lederach JPJenner JM, ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2002:.
55. Lilly DThe Privatization of Security and Peacebuilding: A Framework for Action. London: International Alert; 2000:.
56. Lutz C.A military history of the American suburbs, the discipline of economics and all things ordinary.Antipode. 2011;43 (3): 901-906.
57. Mac Ginty R.Indigenous peacemaking versus the liberal peace.Cooperation and Conflict. 2008;43 (2): 139-162.
58. Mac Ginty R.Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace.Security Dialogue. 2010a;41 (4): 391-412.
59. Mac Ginty R.Social network analysis and counterinsurgency: A counterproductive strategy?.Critical Studies on Terrorism. 2010b;3 (2): 209-227.
60. Mac Ginty RInternational Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2011:.
61. Mac Ginty R.Between resistance and compliance: Non-participation and the liberal peace.Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 2012;:.
62. Mac Ginty R,Hamieh CS.A very political reconstruction: Governance and reconstruction in Lebanon after the 2006 war.Disasters. 2009;33 (3): 103-123.
63. Maclure R.Endogenous educational research in Sub-Saharan Africa.Harvard Educational Review. 2006;71 (6): 80-109.
64. Meyer JW,Rowan B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;83 (2): 340-363.
65. Meyer J,Boli J,Thomas G,Ramiriez F.World society and the nation state.American Journal of Sociology. 1997;103 (1): 144-181.
66. Meyer J,Jepperson R.The 'actors' of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency.Sociological Theory. 2000;18 (1): 100-120.
67. Nuruzzaman M.Revisiting the category of fragile and failed states in international relations.International Studies. 2009;46 (3): 271-294.
68. OlsonL (2010) US vs. Global Defense Spending. The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. Accessed at: http://armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/US_vs_Global/.
69. OSCE (2011) What we do. OSCE website at: http://www.osce.org/what.
70. Owusu M.Policy studies, development and political anthropology.Journal of Modern African Studies. 1975;13 (3): 367-381.
71. Perlman D.Open letter to President Obama from conflict analysis professionals for enduring security.Huffington Post. 2009;:.
72. Perlman D.Mediators beyond borders: Blaze a trail in Copenhagen.S-CAR Newsletter. 2010;4 (1): 1.
73. Price DWeaponizing Anthropology: Social Science in the Service of the Militarized State. Oakland, CA: AK Press; 2011:.
74. Pugh M.The political economy of peacebuilding: A critical theory perspective.International Journal of Peace Studies. 2005;10 (2): 23-42.
75. Reychler L,Paffenholz TPeacebuilding: A Field Guide. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2001:.
76. Richmond OThe Transformation of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2005:.
77. Richmond O.Critical agency, resistance and a post-colonial civil society.Cooperation and Conflict. 2011;46 (4): 419-440.
78. Richmond O,Carey HSubcontracting Peace: The Challenges of NGO Peacebuilding. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2005:.
79. Richmond O,Franks JLiberal Peace Transitions: Between Statebuilding and Peacebuilding. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2009:.
80. Riles A.Unwinding technocratic and anthropological knowledge.American Ethnologist. 2004;31 (3): 392-405.
81. Roberts DLiberal Peacebuilding and Global Governance: Beyond the Metropolis. London: Routledge; 2011:.
82. Russett B,Taylor A.Who talks, and who's listening? Networks of international security studies.Security Dialogue. 2010;41 (6): 589-598.
83. Scholey PA Decade of Human Security: Global Governance and New Multilateralisms. Maclean SJBlack DRShaw TM, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006:179-192.
84. Scott JCWeapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1987:.
85. Scott JCEveryday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Colburn FD, ed. New York: M. E. Sharpe; 1989:.
86. Shapiro M.'Deliberative', 'independent' technocracy v. democratic politics; Will the global echo the EU?.Law and Contemporary Problems. 2005;68 (3/4): 341-356.
87. The Sphere Project: The Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Geneva: Sphere; 2011:.
88. Tinker T,Lowe T.One dimensional management science: The making of a technocratic consciousness.Interfaces. 1984;14 (2): 40-56.
89. United Nations (1992) An Agenda for Peace, Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-keeping. Report of the Secretary General pursuant to the statement adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992. Document A/47/277 - S/24111. Accessed at: http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/agpeace.html.
90. An Agenda for Development: Report for the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. A/48/935; 1994:.
91. Supplement to an Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations, A/RES/51/242; 1995:.
92. An Agenda for Democratization. New York: United Nations, A/51/761; 1996:.
93. Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations. New York: United Nations, A/55/305; 2000:.
94. A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. Report of the High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. New York: United Nations; 2004:.
95. Review of United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture. New York: United Nations, A/64/868; 2010a:.
96. Monitoring Peace Consolidation: United Nations Practitioners' Guide to Benchmarking. New York: United Nations; 2010b:.
97. Report of the UNDG/ECHA Working Group on Transition Issues. New York: United Nations; 2004:.
98. United Nations Development Group/Executive Committee on Humanitarian Affairs (2004) Interagency Framework for Conflict Analysis in Transition Situations. UNDG/ECHA Working Group on Transition. Accessed at:http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&type=Document&id=3415.
99. Governance for Peace: Securing the Social Contract. New York: UNDP; 2012:.
100. USAID (2011) Private Voluntary Cooperation. USAID website: http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/cross-cutting_programs/private_voluntary_cooperation/.
101. Walker PProfessionalising the Humanitarian Sector: A Scoping Study. London: ELRHA; 2010:.
102. Walzer MJust and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustration. New York: Basic Books; 2006:.
103. Wassara STraditional Mechanisms of Conflict Resolution in Southern Sudan. Berlin: Berghof Foundation for Peace Support; 2007:.
104. Weiss TG.Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges.Third World Quarterly. 2000;21 (5): 795-814.
105. National Security Strategy. Washington, D.C.: White House; 2010:.
106. World Bank (Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction Team) (2002) The conflict analysis framework: Identifying conflict-related obstacles to development, Dissemination notes 5.
107. World Bank (2005) Conflict Analysis Framework (draft), Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction Team. Accessed at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCPR/214574-1112883508044/20657757/CAFApril2005.pdf.
108. Washington, D.C.: World Bank; 2011a:.
109. World Bank (2011b) About us. World Bank website. Accessed at: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/0,pagePK:50004410~piPK:36602~theSitePK:29708,00.html.