"Deliberative," "Independent" Technocracy v. democratic politics: Will the globe echo the E.U.?

Law and Contemporary Problems

Volumn 68, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 341-356

  Shapiro, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744464602     PISSN: 00239186     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. See, e.g., Transatlantic Policymaking in an Age of Austerity: Diversity and Drift (Martin Levin & Martin Shapiro eds., 2004).
2. See, e.g., The New Politics of Public Policy (Marc Landy & Martin Levin eds., 1996);
3. Seeking the Center: Politics and Policymaking at the New Century (Martin Levin et al. eds., 2001).
4. There seems to have been little attention among NPM types to the fact that, in the private sector they so wish to emulate, the big bucks go not to managers who produce services but to corporate strategists.
5. Ezra Suleiman, Dismantling Democratic States (2003).
6. Richard Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 1667 (1975).
7. Martin Shapiro, The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies 54 (1968).
8. See Walter Mattli and Tim Büthe, Global Private Governance: Lessons from a National Model of Setting Standards in Accounting, 68 L. & Contemp. Probs. 225 (Summer/Autumn 2005).
9. Carol Harlow, Accountability in the European Union 159-65 (2002);
10. H.P. Nehl, Principles of Administrative Procedure in E.C. Law (1999);
11. Martin Shapiro & Alec Stone Sweet, On Law, Politics and Judicialization ch. 4 (2002);
12. Martin Shapiro, The Institutionalization of European Administrative Space, in The Institutionalization of Europe 94 (W. Sandholtz et al. eds., 2001).
13. Regulating Europe (Giandomenico Majone ed., 1996).
14. The European Union: How Democratic is it? (Svein Andersen & Kjell Eliassen eds., 2000).
15. E.U. Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics (Christian Joerges & Ellen Vos eds., 1999).
16. See Koen Lenaerts & Amaryllis Verhoeven, Towards a Legal Framework for Executive Rule-Making in the E.U.? The Contribution of the New Comitology Decision, 12 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 645, 645-60 (2000).
17. J.H. Weiler, The Constitution of Europe ch. 6 (1999).
18. Anne-Marie Slaughter, A New World Order (2004).
19. See, e.g., Paul Verkuhl, Comment: Rulemaking Ossification - A Modest Proposal, 47 Admin. L. Rev. 453, 453-58 (1995).
20. See Joshua Cohen & Charles Sabel, Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy, 3 Eur. L.J. 313 (1997).
21. Christian Joerges & Jürgen Neyer, Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-Solving, 4 J. Eur. Pub. Pol'y 609 (1997).
22. See Francis Snyder, Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community, in The Construction of Europe 197 (Samuel Martin ed., 1994).
23. Joseph Weiler made this suggestion.
24. Marvin H. Bernstein, Regulating Business by Independent Commission (1955);
25. Robert E. Cushman, The Independent Regulatory Commissions (1941);
26. James Landis, The Administrative Process (1938).
27. See The New European Agencies (Alexander Kreher ed., 1996)
28. See Martin Shapiro, The Problems of Independent Agencies in the United States and the European Union, 4 J. Eur. Pub. Pol'y 276 (1997).
29. New Steps: Improving Management in Government (Barry J. O'Toole & Grant Jordan eds., 1995).
30. R. De Housse, Regulation by Networks in the European Community: the Role of European Agencies, 4 J. Eur. Pub. Pol'y 246 (1997).
31. See discussion supra Part VI.
32. See Martin Shapiro, The Frontiers of Science Doctrine, in Integrating Scientific Expertise into Regulatory Decision-Making: National Decisions and European Innovations 325, 340 (Christian Joerges et al. eds., 1997).
33. See discussion supra Part II.B.
34. See Stewart, supra note 5, at n.2.
35. See sources cited supra note 8 and the discussion supra Part II.B.
36. See Richard Pierce, Jr., Seven Ways to Deossify Agency Rulemaking, 47 Admin. L. Rev. 59 (1995).