In-hospital outcomes and cost assessment between bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1053-1058

  Sugihara, Toru ^a,b   Yasunaga, Hideo ^c   Horiguchi, Hiromasa ^c   Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ^b   Nishimatsu, Hiroaki ^b   Kume, Haruki ^b   Ohe, Kazuhiko ^c   Matsuda, Shinya ^d   Homma, Yukio ^b  

^a Shintoshi Hospital   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SORBITOL;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; BLADDER INJURY; BLADDER IRRIGATION; BLOOD AUTOTRANSFUSION; DATA BASE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HYPONATREMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM INJURY; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; SEPSIS; STROKE; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRA INJURY; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; WATER INTOXICATION;

AGED; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84865196326     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0592     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, et al. American Urological Association Guideline: Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). 2010. Available at: Http:// www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and-quality-care/ clinicalguidelines. cfm?sub=bph&CFID= 429170&CFTOKEN= 276448 70&jsessionid = 84301422c614a2e7c3b57e1b7a242a594471. Accessed: September 1, 2011.
2. de la Rosette J, Alivizatos G, Madersbacher S, et al. Guidelines on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. 2009; Available at: Http://www.uroweb.org/ fileadmin/tx-eauguidelines/2004/ Full/BPH-2004.pdf. Accessed: September 1, 2011.
3. Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC, et al. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. N Engl J Med 1995;332:75-79.
4. Burke N, Whelan JP, Goeree L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Urology 2010;75:1015-1022.
5. Lourenco T, Pickard R, Vale L, et al. Alternative approaches to endoscopic ablation for benign enlargement of the prostate: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2008;337:a449.
6. Mamoulakis C, Ubbink DT, de la Rosette JJ. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol 2009;56:798-809.
7. Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: To whom do the results of this trial apply? Lancet 2005;365:82-93.
8. Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Imanaka Y, et al. Injury severity score, resource use, and outcome for trauma patients within a Japanese administrative database. J Trauma 2010;68:463-470.
9. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, et al. Impact of hospital volume and laser use on postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality in cases of benign prostate hyperplasia. J Urol 2011;185:2248-2253.
10. Yasunaga H, Yanaihara H, Fuji K, et al. Impact of hospital volume on postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality after renal surgery: Data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database. Urology 2010;76: 548-552.
11. Guzzo TJ, Dluzniewski P, Orosco R, et al. Prediction of mortality after radical prostatectomy by Charlson comorbidity index. Urology 2010;76:553-557.
12. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130-1139.
13. Brosnahan J, Jull A, Tracy C. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalised adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD004013.
14. Masumori N, Kamoto T, Seki N, Homma Y. Surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A nationwide survey in Japan. Int J Urol 2011;18:166-170.
15. Mamoulakis C, de la Rosette JJ, Ubbink DT. Re: Burke et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the reatment of benign prostatic obstruction (Urology 2010;75:1015-1022). Urology 2010;75:1235-1237.
16. Fagerström T, Nyman CR, Hahn RG. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes less bleeding than the monopolar technique: A single-centre randomized trial of 202 patients. BJU Int 2010;105:1560-1564.
17. Abascal Junquera JM, Cecchini Rosell L, Salvador Lacambra C, et al. [Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: Peroperative analysis of the results]. (Spa) Actas Urol Esp 2006;30:661-666.
18. Chen Q, Zhang L, Fan QL, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: Results of a randomized trial with a 2-year followup. BJU Int 2010;106:1339-1343.
19. Ho HS, Yip SK, Lim KB, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol 2007;52:517-522.
20. Michielsen DP, Debacker T, De Boe V, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline-an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction? J Urol 2007;178: 2035-2039.
21. Rose A, Suttor S, Goebell PJ, et al. [Transurethral resection of bladder tumors and prostate enlargement in physiological saline solution (TURIS). A prospective study.] (Ger) Urologe A 2007;46:1148-1150.
22. Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, Vani K. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: Randomized controlled study. J Endourol 2005;19:333-338.
23. Mamoulakis C, Skolarikos A, Schulze M, et al. Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 2010;109:240-248.
24. Huang X, Wang XH, Qu LJ, et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: Pathologic study in canines. Urology 2007;70:180-184.
25. Miki M. TUR in saline (TURis)-its development, characteristic features, and recent modifications. Hinyoki Geka 2008;21:775-781.
26. Qu L, Wang X, Huang X, et al. The hemostatic properties of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate: Comparison with conventional resectoscope in an ex vivo study. Urol Int 2008;80:292-295.
27. Hashimoto H, Ikegami N, Shibuya K, et al. Cost containment and quality of care in Japan: Is there a trade-off? Lancet 2011;378:1174-1182.
28. OECD: OECD health data 2011. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2011.
29. Okamura K, Nojiri Y, Seki N, et al. Perioperative management of transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A nationwide survey in Japan. Int J Urol 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02712.x. Epub ahead of print.
30. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, et al. Admissions related to interstitial cystitis in Japan: An estimation based on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Int J Urol 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011. 02883.x. Epub ahead of print.