Field monitoring of avian influenza viruses: Whole-genome sequencing and tracking of neuraminidase evolution using 454 pyrosequencing

Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2881-2887

  Croville, Guillaume ^a,b   Soubies, Sébastien Mathieu ^a,b   Barbieri, Johanna ^a,b   Klopp, Christophe ^c   Mariette, Jérôme ^c   Bouchez, Olivier ^c   Camus Bouclainville, Christelle ^a,b   Guérin, Jean Luc ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b IHAP   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; HEMAGGLUTININ; SIALIDASE; VIRUS RNA;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AVIAN INFLUENZA; AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUS; DNA POLYMORPHISM; DUCK; FECES ANALYSIS; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE DELETION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HA GENE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NA GENE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROSEQUENCING; RECEPTOR BINDING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TURKEY (BIRD); VIRUS GENE; VIRUS GENOME; VIRUS VIRULENCE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMALS; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; DUCKS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, VIRAL; HEMAGGLUTININS, VIRAL; INFLUENZA IN BIRDS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION, MISSENSE; NEURAMINIDASE; RNA, VIRAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE DELETION; TURKEYS; UNITED STATES; VIRAL PROTEINS;

EID: 84865179843     PISSN: 00951137     EISSN: 1098660X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01142-12     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Comin A, Klinkenberg D, Marangon S, Toffan A, Stegeman A. 2011. Transmission dynamics of low pathogenicity avian influenza infections in Turkey flocks. PLoS One 6:e26935.
2. Di Trani L, et al. 2004. Molecular characterization of low pathogenicity H7N3 avian influenza viruses isolated in Italy. Avian Dis. 48:376-383. (Pubitemid 39508874)
3. Fouchier RA, et al. 2000. Detection of influenza A viruses from different species by PCR amplification of conserved sequences in the matrix gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4096-4101. (Pubitemid 32233210)
4. Giannecchini S, et al. 2006. Comparison of in vitro replication features of H7N3 influenza viruses from wild ducks and turkeys: potential implications for interspecies transmission. J. Gen. Virol. 87:171-175. (Pubitemid 43056955)
5. Guionie O, et al. 2007. Laboratory evaluation of a quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR assay for the detection and identification of the four subgroups of avian metapneumovirus. J. Virol. Methods 139:150-158. (Pubitemid 46091805)
6. Hedskog C, et al. 2010. Dynamics of HIV-1 quasispecies during antiviral treatment dissected using ultra-deep pyrosequencing. PLoS One 5:e11345.
7. Hoffmann E, Stech J, Guan Y, Webster RG, Perez DR. 2001. Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch. Virol. 146:2275-2289. (Pubitemid 34682391)
8. Hoffmann TW, et al. 2012. Length variations in the NA stalk of an H7N1 influenza virus have opposite effects on viral excretion in chickens and ducks. J. Virol. 86:584-588.
9. Inoue M, et al. 2010. Emergence of oseltamivir-resistant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus within 48 hours. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16:1633-1636.
10. Kent WJ. 2002. BLAT: the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 12: 656-664.
11. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754-1760.
12. Li H, et al. 2009. The Sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078-2079.
13. Li J, Zu Dohna H, Cardona CJ, Miller J, Carpenter TE. 2011. Emergence and genetic variation of neuraminidase stalk deletions in avian influenza viruses. PLoS One 6:e14722.
14. Mariette J, Noirot C, Klopp C. 2011. Assessment of replicate bias in 454 pyrosequencing and a multi-purpose read-filtering tool. BMC Res. Notes 4:149.
15. Mathieu C, et al. 2010. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in breeding turkeys, Valparaiso, Chile. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16:709-711.
16. Matrosovich M, Zhou N, Kawaoka Y, Webster R. 1999. The surface glycoproteins ofH5influenza viruses isolated from humans, chickens, and wild aquatic birds have distinguishable properties. J. Virol. 73:1146-1155. (Pubitemid 29036766)
17. Matsuoka Y, et al. 2009. Neuraminidase stalk length and additional glycosylation of the hemagglutinin influence the virulence of influenza H5N1 viruses for mice. J. Virol. 83:4704-4708.
18. McHardy AC, Ben Adams B. 2009. The role of genomics in tracking the evolution of influenza A virus. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000566.
19. Mitnaul LJ, et al. 2000. Balanced hemagglutinin and neuraminidase activities are critical for efficient replication of influenza A virus. J. Virol. 74:6015-6020. (Pubitemid 30412971)
20. Munier S, et al. 2010. A genetically engineered waterfowl influenza virus with a deletion in the stalk of the neuraminidase has increased virulence for chickens. J. Virol. 84:940-952.
21. Pillai SPS, Pantin-Jackwood M, Yassine HM, Saif YM, Lee CW. 2010. The high susceptibility of turkeys to influenza viruses of different origins implies their importance as potential intermediate hosts. Avian Dis. 54: 522-526.
22. Robinson JT, et al. 2011. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29:24-26.
23. Sorrell EM, Song H, Pena L, Perez DR. 2010. A 27-amino-acid deletion in the neuraminidase stalk supports replication of an avian H2N2 influenza A virus in the respiratory tract of chickens. J. Virol. 84:11831-11840.
24. Zhou H, et al. 2009. The special neuraminidase stalk-motif responsible for increased virulence and pathogenesis of H5N1 influenza A virus. PLoS One 4:e6277.