Development and growth of primordial shoots in Norway spruce buds before visible bud burst in relation to time and temperature in the field

Tree Physiology

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 987-997

  Sutinen, Sirkka ^a   Partanen, Jouni ^a   Viherä Aarnio, Anneli ^a   Häkkinen, Risto ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

bud development; microscopy; Picea abies; primordial shoot ratio; threshold temperature; time step of temperature summation

Indexed keywords

AIR TEMPERATURE; BUDBURST; CONIFEROUS TREE; DORMANCY; GROWTH; LIPID; MICROSCOPY; PHENOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; SHOOT; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE; FINLAND; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MERISTEM; NORWAY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEASON; SPRUCE; TEMPERATURE; TREE; VASCULAR BUNDLE (PLANT);

CLIMATE; FINLAND; MERISTEM; NORWAY; PICEA; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANT STEMS; PLANT VASCULAR BUNDLE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEASONS; TEMPERATURE; TREES;

EID: 84865172951     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps063     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahas, R., A. Aasa, A. Menzel, V.G. Fedotova and H. Scheifinger. 2002. Changes in European spring phenology. Int J. Climatol. 22:1727-1738.
2. Alaudinova, E.V. and P.V. Mironov. 2010. Lipids of the meristems of the main coniferous edificators from Central Siberia under low temperature adaptation: 1. The characteristics of the fatty acid composition of phospholipids from winter meristems of Larix sibirica Ledeb., Picea obovata L., and Pinus sylvestris L. Russ J. Bioorganic Chem. 36:867-871.
3. Beuker, E. 1994. Adaptation to climatic changes of the timing of bud burst in populations of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L) Karst. Tree Physiol. 14:961-970.
4. Bolin, B., B.R. Döös, J. Jäger and R.A. Warrick. 1986. The greenhouse effect, climatic change and ecosystems. SCOPE 29. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 541 p.
5. Bünning, E. 1964. The physiological clock. Springer, Berlin, 145 p.
6. Cajander, A.K. 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta For. Fenn. 56:1-71.
7. Campbell, R.K. and A.I. Sugano. 1975. Phenology of bud burst in Douglas-fir related to provenance, photoperiod, chilling, and flushing temperature. Bot. Gaz. 136:290-298.
8. Cannell, M.G.R. and R.I. Smith. 1983. Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis J. Appl. Ecol. 23:177-191.
9. Cannell, M.G.R., M.B. Murray and L.J. Sheppard. 1985. Frost avoidance by selection for late budburst in Picea sitchensis J. Appl. Ecol. 22:931-941.
10. Carter, T., M. Posch and H. Tuomenvirta. 1995. SILMUSCEN and CLIGEN users guide; guidelines for the construction of climatic scenarios and use of a stochastic weather generator in the Finnish Research Programme of Climate Change (SILMU). Publications of the Academy of Finland, 5/95. Painatuskeskus (Government Printing Centre), Helsinki, 62
11. Coville, F.V. 1920. The influence of cold in stimulating the growth of plants J. Agric. Res. 20:151-160.
12. De Faÿ, E., V. Vacher and F. Humbert. 2000. Water-related phenomena in winter buds and twigs of Picea abies L. (Karst.) until bud-burst: A biological, histological and NMR study. Ann. Bot. 86:1097-1107.
13. Fuchigami, L.H., C.J. Weiser, K. Kobayashi, R. Timmis and L.W. Gusta. 1982. A degree growth stage (GS) model and cold acclimation in temperate woody plants. In Plant Cold Hardiness and Freezing Stress. Mechanisms and Crop Implications. Vol. 2. Eds P.H. Li and A. Sakai. Academic Press, New York, pp 93-116.
14. Granhus, A., I.S. Fløistad and G. Søgaard. 2009. Bud burst timing in Picea abies seedlings as affected by temperature during dormancy induction and mild spells during chilling. Tree Physiol. 29:497-503.
15. Häkkinen, R. 1999a. Analysis of bud-development theories based on long-term phenological and air temperature time series: Application to Betula sp. leaves. Finn. For. Res. Inst. Res. Papers 754, 59.
16. Häkkinen, R. 1999b. Statistical evaluation of bud development theories: Application to bud burst of Betula pendula leaves. Tree Physiol. 19:613-618.
17. Häkkinen, R., T. Linkosalo and P. Hari. 1998. Effects of dormancy and environmental factors on timing of bud burst in Betula pendula. Tree Physiol. 18:707-712.
18. Hannerz, M. 1994. Predicting the risk of frost occurrence after budburst of Norway spruce in Sweden. Silva Fenn. 28:243-249.
19. Hannerz, M. 1999. Evaluation of temperature models for predicting bud burst in Norway spruce. Can J. For. Res. 29:9-19.
20. Hänninen, H. 1990. Modelling bud dormancy release in trees from cool and temperate regions. Acta For. Fenn. 213:1-47.
21. Hänninen, H. 1991. Does climatic warming increase the risk of frost damage in northern trees? Plant Cell Environ. 14:449-454.
22. Hänninen, H. 1995. Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: An ecophysiological approach to modelling of bud burst phenology. Can J. Bot. 73:183-199.
23. Hänninen, H., M. Slaney and S. Linder. 2007. Dormancy release of Norway spruce under climatic warming: Testing ecophysiological models of bud burst with a whole-tree chamber experiment. Tree Physiol. 27:291-300.
24. Hari, P. 1972. Physiological stage of development in biological models of growth and maturation. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 9:107-115.
25. Heide, O.M. 1985. Physiological aspects of climatic adaptation in plants with special reference to high-latitude environments. In Plant Production in the North. Eds. Ä. Kaurin, O. Junttila and J. Nilsen. Norwegian University Press, Tromsø, pp 1-22.
26. Heide, O.M. 1993a. Daylength and thermal time responses of budburst during dormancy release in some northern deciduous trees. Physiol. Plant. 88:531-540.
27. Heide, O.M. 1993b. Dormancy release in beech buds (Fagus sylvatica) requires both chilling and long days. Physiol. Plant. 89:187-191.
28. Heide, O.M. 2003. High autumn temperature delays spring bud burst in boreal trees, counterbalancing the effect of climatic warming. Tree Physiol. 23:931-936.
29. Kellomäki, S., H. Hänninen and M. Kolström. 1995. Computations on frost damage to Scots pine under climatic warming in boreal conditions. Ecol. Appl. 5:42-52.
30. Kivimäenpää, M., A.M. Jönsson, I. Stjernquist, G. Selldén and S. Sutinen. 2004. The use of light and electron microscopy to assess the impact of ozone on Norway spruce needles. Environ. Pollut. 127:441-453.
31. Kobayashi, K.D. and L.H. Fuchigami. 1983. Modelling temperature effects in breaking rest in red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea L.). Ann. Bot. 52:205-215.
32. Landsberg, J.J. 1974. Apple fruit bud development and growth; analysis and an empirical model. Ann. Bot. 38:1013-1023.
33. Lang, G.A., J.D. Early, G.C. Martin and R.L. Darnell. 1987. Endo-, para-, and ecodormancy: Physiological terminology and classification for dormancy research. Hortic. Sci. 22:371-377.
34. Linkosalo, T., T.R. Carter, R. Häkkinen and P. Hari. 2000. Predicting spring phenology and frost damage risk of Betula sp. under climatic warming: A comparison of two models. Tree Physiol 20:1175-1182.
35. Linkosalo, T. and M.J. Lechowicz. 2006. Twilight far-red treatment advances leaf bud burst of silver birch (Betula pendula). Tree Physiol. 26:1249-1256.
36. Linkosalo, T.,H.K. Lappalainen and P. Hari. 2008. A comparison of phenological models of leaf bud burst and flowering of boreal trees using independent observations. Tree Physiol. 28:1873-1882.
37. Luoranen, J., S. Sutinen and R. Rikala. 2010. Predicting spring frost sensitivity by bud development and temperature sum in Norway spruce seedlings. Trees 24:809-817.
38. Lüttge, U. and B. Hertel 2009. Diurnal and annual rhythms in trees. Trees 23:683-700.
39. Nienstaedt, H. 1967. Chilling requirements in seven Picea species. Silvae Genet. 16:65-68.
40. Partanen, J., V. Koski and H. Hänninen. 1998. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on the timing of bud burst in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Tree Physiol. 18:811-816.
41. Partanen, J., I. Leinonen and T. Repo. 2001. Effect of accumulated duration of the light period on bud burst in Norway spruce (Picea abies) of varying ages. Silva Fenn. 35:111-117.
42. Perry, T.O. 1971. Dormancy of trees in winter. Science 171:29-36.
43. Romberger, J.A. 1963. Meristems, growth and development in woody plants. USDA For. Serv. Tech. Bull. 1293:214.
44. Sarvas, R. 1972. Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees. Active period. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 76:1-110.
45. Sarvas, R. 1974. Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees II. Autumn dormancy and winter dormancy. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 84:1-101.
46. Schneider, S.H. 1989. The greenhouse effect: Science and policy. Science 243:771-781.
47. Slaney, M., G. Wallin, J. Medhurst and S. Linder. 2007. Impact of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and temperature on bud burst and shoot growth of boreal Norway spruce. Tree Physiol. 27:301-312.
48. Smith, H. and N.P. Kefford. 1964. The chemical regulation of the dormancy phases of bud development. Am J. Bot. 51:1002-1012.
49. Søgaard, G., J. Øystein, J. Nilsen and O. Junttila. 2008. Climatic control of bud burst in young seedlings of nine provenances of Norway spruce. Tree Physiol. 28:311-320.
50. Soikkeli, S. 1980. Ultrastructure of the mesophyll in Scots pine and Norway spruce: Seasonal variation and molarity of fixative buffer. Protoplasma 103:241-252.
51. Sutinen, S., J. Partanen, A. Viherä-Aarnio and R. Häkkinen. 2009. Anatomy and morphology in developing vegetative buds on detached Norway spruce branches in controlled conditions before bud burst. Tree Physiol. 29:1457-1465.
52. Weiser, C.J. 1970. Cold resistance and injury in woody plants. Science 169:1269-1278.
53. Worrall, J. and F. Mergen. 1967. Environmental and genetic control of dormancy in Picea abies. Physiol. Plant. 20:733-745.